Paper · 2025 · Journal of Experimental Agriculture International

Performance Evaluation of a Sensor Based Tractor Drawn Ginger Planter

T. Mahesh Babu; Preman P. S.; Jayan P. R.; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The use of single-seed planters is essential for ensuring uniform plant distribution in agricultural operations. In these planters, seed metering units are typically powered by a drive wheel, which transfers motion through various transmission components like chains, gears, shafts, and belts. However, during planting, the force exerted by the transmission system and the seed metering unit’s drive mechanism on the drive wheel can cause slippage or a loss of traction. This affects the overall performance of the seed metering units, leading to uneven plant spacing due to the shared transmission system. To mitigate these challenges, a sensor-based control system was developed. This study delves into the design of this sensor-based system and evaluates its impact on planting quality, particularly in terms of plant spacing uniformity and field performance. Field trials conducted using the sensor-based system showed encouraging results, with a quality of feed index (Iqf) of 97.34 per cent, multiple index (Imult) of 0.95 per cent, missing index (Imiss) of 1.5 per cent, and a cell fill efficiency of 93.33 per cent. The average hill-to-hill distance was measured 20.03 cm, and it gives the field efficiency was 84 per cent. These metrics indicate that plant spacing uniformity was effectively maintained. The sensor-based system demonstrated significant improvements in planting consistency during field trials. Additionally, the system offers the ability to regulate seed rates, reduce labour input, and save time. For future enhancements, further research should focus on optimizing the structural design of seed metering units. This includes refining aspects such as cell diameter and thickness, number of cells, and methods used for connecting components to ensure better mechanical integration between the sensor system and the planter.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The sensor-based planter reached a quality of feed index of 97.34 per cent in field trials.

Outcome
quality of feed index (Iqf)e1
Value
97.34 per cente1
Setting
Field trialse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tractor Drawn Ginger Planter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“Field trials conducted using the sensor-based system showed encouraging results, with a quality of feed index (Iqf) of 97.34 per cent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–996 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The sensor-based planter reached a multiple index of 0.95 per cent.

Outcome
multiple index (Imult)e2
Value
0.95 per cente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tractor Drawn Ginger Planter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–69 · show in text ↑
e2

“multiple index (Imult) of 0.95 per cent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1037 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The sensor-based planter reached a missing index of 1.5 per cent.

Outcome
missing index (Imiss)e3
Value
1.5 per cente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tractor Drawn Ginger Planter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–69 · show in text ↑
e3

“missing index (Imiss) of 1.5 per cent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1076 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The sensor-based planter reached a cell fill efficiency of 93.33 per cent.

Outcome
cell fill efficiencye4
Value
93.33 per cente4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tractor Drawn Ginger Planter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–69 · show in text ↑
e4

“a cell fill efficiency of 93.33 per cent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1122 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The average hill-to-hill distance of the planted ginger was 20.03 cm.

Outcome
average hill-to-hill distancee5
Value
20.03 cme5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tractor Drawn Ginger Planter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–69 · show in text ↑
e5

“The average hill-to-hill distance was measured 20.03 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1179 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The sensor-based planter reached a field efficiency of 84 per cent.

Outcome
field efficiencye6
Value
84 per cente6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tractor Drawn Ginger Planter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–69 · show in text ↑
e6

“it gives the field efficiency was 84 per cent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1230 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The sensor-based system gave significant improvements in planting consistency of ginger in field trials.

Treatment
sensor-based systeme0
Outcome
planting consistencye0
Direction
significant improvementse0
Setting
field trialse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tractor Drawn Ginger Planter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–69 · show in text ↑
e0

“The sensor-based system demonstrated significant improvements in planting consistency during field trials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1418 · show in text ↑