Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Effect of foliar application of nano urea and nano-dap on growth, yield attributes and yield of green gram (Vigna radiata L.)

Magar PS; Gadade GD; Shelke VR; et al.

2
claims
2
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field investigation was undertaken during Kharif 2024 at the Experimental Farm, Department of Agronomy, VNMKV, Parbhani to study the effect of foliar application of nano urea and nano-DAP on growth, yield attributes and yield of green gram (Vigna radiata L.). The experiment comprised of seven treatments and three replications and was set in randomized block design. The treatments comprised different combinations of RDF (Recommended Dose of Fertilizer) and foliar applications of nano urea and nano-DAP. The findings of investigation indicated that application of 75% RDF +0.4% foliar spray of nano urea at 25 & 40 DAS recorded significantly higher growth attributes of green gram and was at par with 25:50:25 NPK Kg ha-1 (100% RDF), 75% RDF + 0.4% spray of nano urea at 25 DAS +0.4% spray of nano DAP at 45 DAS and application of 75% RDF + 0.4% spray of nano DAP at 45 DAS (T3). Whereas application of 25:50:25 NPK Kg ha-1 (100% RDF) recorded higher yield attributes and yield of green gram and was comparable with 75% RDF + 0.4% spray of nano urea at 25 DAS +0.4% spray of nano DAP at 45 DAS and 75% RDF + 0.4% spray of nano DAP at 45 DAS.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

75% RDF plus two nano urea sprays gave significantly higher green gram growth attributes and was at par with three other regimes.

Treatment
75% RDF +0.4% foliar spray of nano urea at 25 & 40 DASe0
Outcome
growth attributes of green grame0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
was at par withe0
Comparator
25:50:25 NPK Kg ha-1 (100% RDF)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 75% RDF +0.4% foliar spray of nano urea at 25 & 40 DAS recorded significantly higher growth attributes of green gram and was at par with 25:50:25 NPK Kg ha-1 (100% RDF), 75% RDF + 0.4% spray of nano urea at 25 DAS +0.4% spray of nano DAP at 45 DAS and application of 75% RDF + 0.4% spray of nano DAP at 45 DAS (T3).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–884 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full RDF recorded higher green gram yield attributes and yield and was comparable with two nano fertilizer regimes.

Treatment
25:50:25 NPK Kg ha-1 (100% RDF)e0
Outcome
yield attributes and yield of green grame0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
was comparable withe0
Comparator
75% RDF + 0.4% spray of nano urea at 25 DAS +0.4% spray of nano DAP at 45 DASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 25:50:25 NPK Kg ha-1 (100% RDF) recorded higher yield attributes and yield of green gram and was comparable with 75% RDF + 0.4% spray of nano urea at 25 DAS +0.4% spray of nano DAP at 45 DAS and 75% RDF + 0.4% spray of nano DAP at 45 DAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1146 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 32 positive, 4 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 39 positive, 1 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

application · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

98 papers: 94 positive, 4 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

94 papers more in this group

See all 98 papers →

fertilization · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 140 positive, 5 negative or no effect

139 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

375 papers: 364 positive, 11 negative or no effect

363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

371 papers more in this group

See all 375 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.