Paper · 2025 · Potato Research

Early Blight Infection and the Influence of Biocontrol Agents on Three Wild Potato Relatives: Implications for Integrated Pest Management (IPM) in Potato

Åsa Lankinen; Christian B. Andersen; Hadis Mostafanezhad; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Integrated pest management (IPM) is an important tool for sustainable crop production. IPM includes a diversity of methods, e.g., the use of biological control agents (BCAs) for disease control or growth promotion. While there is an increasing interest in the use of BCAs, less is known about their environmental costs and benefits on wild species, such as wild crop relatives. For example, a BCA may have the positive effect of controlling disease in wild relatives, but could also have the negative effect of growth promotion on wild relatives that act as weeds. In this study, we investigated if three wild potato relatives—the perennial climber Solanum dulcamara , and the annual weeds S. nigrum and S. physalifolium —could be infected by Alternaria solani , the causal agent of early potato blight in Sweden, and studied how two BCAs, Pythium oligandrum (a laboratory strain) and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (Serenade), affected the disease and growth promotion in a series of greenhouse and field experiments. Our studies confirmed the semantic knowledge that A. solani can infect all three wild species, in particular the two annual species often growing as weeds in potato fields. We also found a disease-controlling effect of B. amyloliquefaciens , but not P. oligandrum , in the greenhouse. Some growth effects were found for both BCAs, but whether these were positive or negative varied with trait, plant species, and genotype. In conclusion, BCAs can confer both environmental costs and benefits on the three wild relatives of potato investigated in the current study, which should be taken into consideration for development of sustainable potato cultivation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternaria solani infected Solanum dulcamara.

Taxon
Solanum dulcamaraSolanum dulcamarae1
Interactor
A. solaniAlternaria solanie0pathogen
Outcome
infecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum dulcamara
Solanum dulcamara · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria solani
Alternaria solani · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A. solani can infect all three wild species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1117 · show in text ↑
e1

“three wild potato relatives—the perennial climber Solanum dulcamara , and the annual weeds S. nigrum and S. physalifolium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–729 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternaria solani infected S. nigrum, particularly strongly among the wild species.

Taxon
S. nigrumSolanum nigrume1
Interactor
A. solaniAlternaria solanie0pathogen
Outcome
infecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum nigrum
Solanum nigrum · TaxonHladac · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria solani
Alternaria solani · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A. solani can infect all three wild species, in particular the two annual species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1155 · show in text ↑
e1

“three wild potato relatives—the perennial climber Solanum dulcamara , and the annual weeds S. nigrum and S. physalifolium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–729 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternaria solani infected S. physalifolium, particularly strongly among the wild species.

Taxon
S. physalifoliumSolanum physalifoliume1
Interactor
A. solaniAlternaria solanie0pathogen
Outcome
infecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum physalifolium
Solanum physalifolium · TaxonQuentin Groom · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria solani
Alternaria solani · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A. solani can infect all three wild species, in particular the two annual species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1155 · show in text ↑
e1

“three wild potato relatives—the perennial climber Solanum dulcamara , and the annual weeds S. nigrum and S. physalifolium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–729 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus amyloliquefaciens controlled disease in the greenhouse.

Taxon
wild potato relativest0
Treatment
B. amyloliquefaciense0
Interactor
B. amyloliquefaciensBacillus amyloliquefaciense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease-controlling effecte0
Direction
disease-controllinge0
Comparator
P. oligandrume0
Setting
greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens · InteractorAgricultural Research Service (NRRL)Culture Collection · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a disease-controlling effect of B. amyloliquefaciens , but not P. oligandrum , in the greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1307 · show in text ↑
t0

“wild potato relatives”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 71–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pythium oligandrum did not control disease in the greenhouse.

Taxon
wild potato relativest0
Treatment
P. oligandrume0
Interactor
P. oligandrumPythium oligandrume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease-controlling effecte0
Comparator
B. amyloliquefaciense0
Setting
greenhousee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pythium oligandrum
Pythium oligandrum · InteractorLordboldemort · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a disease-controlling effect of B. amyloliquefaciens , but not P. oligandrum , in the greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1307 · show in text ↑
t0

“wild potato relatives”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 71–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both biocontrol agents had growth effects that varied in sign by trait, species, and genotype.

Taxon
wild potato relativest0
Treatment
both BCAse0
Outcome
growth effectse0
Qualifier
varied with trait, plant species, and genotypee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Some growth effects were found for both BCAs, but whether these were positive or negative varied with trait, plant species, and genotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1309–1445 · show in text ↑
t0

“wild potato relatives”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 71–92 · show in text ↑