Paper · 2025 · Agronomy

Simulation of Winter Wheat Gross Primary Productivity Incorporating Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence

Xuegui Zhang; Yao Li; Xiaoya Wang; et al.

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Gross primary productivity (GPP) is a key indicator for assessing carbon uptake capacity and photosynthetic productivity in agricultural ecosystems, playing a crucial role in regional carbon cycle evaluation and sustainable agriculture development. However, traditional mechanistic light use efficiency (LUE) models exhibit variable accuracy under different climatic conditions and crop types. Machine learning models, while demonstrating strong fitting capabilities, heavily depend on the selection of input features and data availability. This study focuses on winter wheat in the Guanzhong region, utilizing continuous field observation data from the 2020–2022 growing seasons to develop five machine learning models: Ridge Regression (Ridge), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Gradient Boosting Regression (GB), and a stacking-based ensemble learning model (LSM). These models were compared with the LUE model under two scenarios, excluding and including solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF), to evaluate the contribution of SIF to GPP estimation accuracy. The results indicate significant differences in GPP estimation performance among the machine learning models, with LSM outperforming others in both scenarios. Without SIF, LSM achieved an average R2 of 0.87, surpassing individual models (0.72–0.83), demonstrating strong stability and generalization ability. With SIF inclusion, all machine learning models showed marked accuracy improvements, with LSM’s average R2 rising to 0.91, highlighting SIF’s critical role in capturing photosynthetic dynamics. Although the LUE model approached machine learning model accuracy in some growth stages, its overall performance was limited by structural constraints. This study demonstrates that ensemble learning methods integrating multi-source observations offer significant advantages for high-precision winter wheat GPP estimation, and that incorporating SIF as a physiological indicator further enhances model robustness and predictive capacity. The findings validate the potential of combining ensemble learning and photosynthetic physiological parameters to improve GPP retrieval accuracy, providing a reliable technical pathway for agricultural ecosystem carbon flux estimation and informing strategies for climate change adaptation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LSM outperformed other machine learning models in both scenarios.

Outcome
LSM outperforming otherse0
Direction
outperforminge0
Comparator
otherse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“LSM outperforming others in both scenarios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1245 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without SIF, LSM averaged R2 0.87 and exceeded individual models.

Outcome
R2e0
Direction
surpassinge0
Value
0.87e0
Qualifier
0.72–0.83e0
Comparator
individual modelse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Without SIF, LSM achieved an average R2 of 0.87, surpassing individual models (0.72–0.83)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1336 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding SIF improved the accuracy of all machine learning models.

Treatment
SIF inclusione0
Outcome
accuracye0
Direction
improvementse0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“With SIF inclusion, all machine learning models showed marked accuracy improvements”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1397–1480 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LUE model accuracy approached machine learning accuracy in some growth stages.

Outcome
accuracye0
Direction
approachede0
Qualifier
some growth stagese0
Comparator
machine learning modele0

Verbatim

e0

“the LUE model approached machine learning model accuracy in some growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1600–1678 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Overall LUE model performance was limited.

Outcome
overall performancee0
Qualifier
structural constraintse0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“its overall performance was limited by structural constraints”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1680–1741 · show in text ↑