Paper · 2025 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Effects of grazing on plant functional groups across spatial scales in Stipa breviflora desert steppe

Li Wang; Xiaoyu Du; Juhong Liu; et al.

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

desert steppe through multi-scale (50m×50m, 25m×25m, 2.5m×2.5m) and grazing intensity (no grazing vs. heavy grazing) comparative analyses, revealing the response mechanisms of plant functional group diversity, interspecific associations, and stability. Key findings include: (1) Heavy grazing significantly reduced functional group diversity and evenness, while the Margalef richness index increased at the 25m×25m scale due to patchy invasion of grazing-tolerant species. (2) Interspecific associations exhibited scale-dependent patterns: Large-scale (50m×50m) associations were driven by environmental heterogeneity (e.g., resource competition and complementarity), whereas small-scale (2.5m×2.5m) interactions were dominated by direct species interactions (mutualism or exclusion). (3) Grazing-induced structural simplification through "environmental filtering", heavy grazing reduced functional group quantity, forming simplified symbiotic networks (PC≥0.6) between perennial grasses and annual/biennial plants, while significantly suppressing woody plants and forbs (Perennial forbs, Shrubs and semi-shrubs). (4) Stability analysis demonstrated higher stability of perennial grasses and forbs in ungrazed areas, though the overall system remained unstable. Annual/biennial plants and shrubs/semi-shrubs generally exhibited low disturbance resistance. The study proposes a multi-scale grassland restoration strategy: optimizing resource allocation at large scales while enhancing key species interactions at small scales. These findings provide theoretical foundations for the ecological restoration of degraded desert steppes and adaptive grazing regimes. Future research should integrate climate change and socioeconomic factors to develop more resilient grassland ecosystem management frameworks.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Heavy grazing significantly reduced functional group diversity and evenness in Stipa breviflora desert steppe.

Taxon
Stipa brevifloraStipa breviflorat0
Treatment
Heavy grazinge1
Outcome
functional group diversity and evennesse1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
no grazinge0

Verbatim

t0

“Stipa breviflora desert steppe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“grazing intensity (no grazing vs. heavy grazing)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–116 · show in text ↑
e1

“Heavy grazing significantly reduced functional group diversity and evenness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–354 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Margalef richness index increased at the 25m×25m scale under heavy grazing, attributed to patchy invasion of grazing-tolerant species.

Taxon
Stipa brevifloraStipa breviflorat0
Outcome
Margalef richness indexe2
Direction
increasede2
Qualifier
due to patchy invasion of grazing-tolerant speciese2
Setting
25m×25m scalee2

Verbatim

t0

“Stipa breviflora desert steppe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–101 · show in text ↑
e2

“the Margalef richness index increased at the 25m×25m scale due to patchy invasion of grazing-tolerant species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–471 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Large-scale (50m×50m) associations were driven by environmental heterogeneity such as resource competition and complementarity.

Taxon
Stipa brevifloraStipa breviflorat0
Outcome
Large-scale (50m×50m) associationse3
Qualifier
environmental heterogeneity (e.g., resource competition and complementarity)e3

Verbatim

t0

“Stipa breviflora desert steppe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–101 · show in text ↑
e3

“Large-scale (50m×50m) associations were driven by environmental heterogeneity (e.g., resource competition and complementarity)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–666 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Small-scale (2.5m×2.5m) interactions were dominated by direct species interactions, mutualism or exclusion.

Taxon
Stipa brevifloraStipa breviflorat0
Outcome
small-scale (2.5m×2.5m) interactionse4
Qualifier
direct species interactions (mutualism or exclusion)e4

Verbatim

t0

“Stipa breviflora desert steppe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–101 · show in text ↑
e4

“small-scale (2.5m×2.5m) interactions were dominated by direct species interactions (mutualism or exclusion)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–783 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heavy grazing reduced functional group quantity in Stipa breviflora desert steppe.

Taxon
Stipa brevifloraStipa breviflorat0
Treatment
heavy grazinge5
Outcome
functional group quantitye5
Direction
reducede5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Stipa breviflora desert steppe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–101 · show in text ↑
e5

“heavy grazing reduced functional group quantity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–913 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heavy grazing formed simplified symbiotic networks (PC≥0.6) between perennial grasses and annual/biennial plants.

Taxon
Stipa brevifloraStipa breviflorat0
Outcome
symbiotic networkse6
Value
PC≥0.6e6
Qualifier
simplifiede6

Verbatim

t0

“Stipa breviflora desert steppe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–101 · show in text ↑
e6

“forming simplified symbiotic networks (PC≥0.6) between perennial grasses and annual/biennial plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1014 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Heavy grazing significantly suppressed woody plants and forbs in Stipa breviflora desert steppe.

Taxon
Stipa brevifloraStipa breviflorat0
Treatment
heavy grazinge5
Outcome
woody plants and forbse7
Direction
suppressinge7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Stipa breviflora desert steppe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–101 · show in text ↑
e5

“heavy grazing reduced functional group quantity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–913 · show in text ↑
e7

“significantly suppressing woody plants and forbs (Perennial forbs, Shrubs and semi-shrubs)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Perennial grasses and forbs had higher stability in ungrazed areas than under grazing.

Taxon
perennial grasses and forbse7
Treatment
grazing intensitye0
Outcome
stabilitye7
Direction
highere7
Comparator
ungrazed arease7

Verbatim

e0

“grazing intensity (no grazing vs. heavy grazing)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–116 · show in text ↑
e7

“Stability analysis demonstrated higher stability of perennial grasses and forbs in ungrazed areas, though the overall system remained unstable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1260 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The overall system remained unstable in Stipa breviflora desert steppe.

Taxon
Stipa brevifloraStipa breviflorat0
Outcome
overall systeme7
Qualifier
remained unstablee7

Verbatim

t0

“Stipa breviflora desert steppe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–101 · show in text ↑
e7

“Stability analysis demonstrated higher stability of perennial grasses and forbs in ungrazed areas, though the overall system remained unstable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1260 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual/biennial plants and shrubs/semi-shrubs generally had low disturbance resistance.

Taxon
Annual/biennial plants and shrubs/semi-shrubse0
Outcome
disturbance resistancee0
Qualifier
lowe0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Annual/biennial plants and shrubs/semi-shrubs generally exhibited low disturbance resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1354 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The study proposes a multi-scale grassland restoration strategy: optimise resource allocation at large scales and enhance key species interactions at small scales.

Taxon
Stipa brevifloraStipa breviflorat0
Outcome
multi-scale grassland restoration strategye7
Qualifier
optimizing resource allocation at large scales while enhancing key species interactions at small scalese7

Verbatim

t0

“Stipa breviflora desert steppe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–101 · show in text ↑
e7

“The study proposes a multi-scale grassland restoration strategy: optimizing resource allocation at large scales while enhancing key species interactions at small scales”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1356–1524 · show in text ↑

grazing · ecology: diversity · Stipa brevifloraPositive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.