Paper · 2025 · Journal of Carcinogenesis

Genomic DNA Isolation and DNA Barcoding of Constituent Plants in Athiyadhi Kashayam for Species Authentication

C. Meenakshi; S. Chithra; M. Ramani; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Siddha formulations form a major component of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), but adulteration of traded medicinal plants threatens their safety and therapeutic reliability. Since morphological characters are often lost in processed raw drugs, DNA barcoding has emerged as a robust approach for authentication. In this study, we focused on Athiyadhi Kashayam, a classical Siddha polyherbal formulation, by authenticating five of its key ingredients—Ficus racemosa, Senna auriculata, Cassia fistula, Syzygium cumini, and Salacia oblonga. Genomic DNA was isolated from stem bark tissues using a modified CTAB protocol with β-mercaptoethanol. DNA quality and concentration were confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis, Nanodrop spectrophotometry, and UV visualization. PCR amplification was performed with ITS and rbcL primers, both yielding successful amplification. The resulting sequences were analysed using BLAST against NCBI GenBank, confirming species identity. Validated sequences were submitted to GenBank, and species-specific barcodes were generated. The results highlight the effectiveness of ITS and rbcL markers in authenticating constituent plant species of Athiyadhi Kashayam. This study underscores the importance of DNA barcoding as a reliable tool to ensure authenticity of raw drugs, prevent adulteration, and enhance the credibility of traditional formulations. The genomic data generated also contribute to a growing reference database for medicinal plants, supporting regulatory compliance and quality assurance in herbal drug research and industry..

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ITS and rbcL primers successfully amplified DNA from the five constituent plants.

Taxon
Ficus racemosa, Senna auriculata, Cassia fistula, Syzygium cumini, and Salacia oblongaCassia fistulaFicus racemosaSyzygium cuminiSenna auriculataSalacia oblongae0
Gene
ITS and rbcLe1
Outcome
successful amplificatione1
Value
bothe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cassia fistula
Cassia fistula · TaxonDelonix · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ficus racemosa
Ficus racemosa · TaxonLưu Ly · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Syzygium cumini
Syzygium cumini · Taxonকামরুল ইসলাম শাহীন · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Senna auriculata
Senna auriculata · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ficus racemosa, Senna auriculata, Cassia fistula, Syzygium cumini, and Salacia oblonga”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–549 · show in text ↑
e1

“PCR amplification was performed with ITS and rbcL primers, both yielding successful amplification”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–878 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequence comparison against GenBank confirmed the identity of the constituent species.

Taxon
Ficus racemosa, Senna auriculata, Cassia fistula, Syzygium cumini, and Salacia oblongaCassia fistulaFicus racemosaSyzygium cuminiSenna auriculataSalacia oblongae0
Outcome
species identitye1
Comparator
NCBI GenBanke1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cassia fistula
Cassia fistula · TaxonDelonix · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ficus racemosa
Ficus racemosa · TaxonLưu Ly · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Syzygium cumini
Syzygium cumini · Taxonকামরুল ইসলাম শাহীন · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Senna auriculata
Senna auriculata · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ficus racemosa, Senna auriculata, Cassia fistula, Syzygium cumini, and Salacia oblonga”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–549 · show in text ↑
e1

“The resulting sequences were analysed using BLAST against NCBI GenBank, confirming species identity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–979 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Validated sequences were deposited in GenBank and species-specific barcodes generated.

Taxon
Ficus racemosa, Senna auriculata, Cassia fistula, Syzygium cumini, and Salacia oblongaCassia fistulaFicus racemosaSyzygium cuminiSenna auriculataSalacia oblongae0
Outcome
species-specific barcodese1
Value
Validated sequencese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cassia fistula
Cassia fistula · TaxonDelonix · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ficus racemosa
Ficus racemosa · TaxonLưu Ly · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Syzygium cumini
Syzygium cumini · Taxonকামরুল ইসলাম শাহীন · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Senna auriculata
Senna auriculata · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ficus racemosa, Senna auriculata, Cassia fistula, Syzygium cumini, and Salacia oblonga”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–549 · show in text ↑
e1

“Validated sequences were submitted to GenBank, and species-specific barcodes were generated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1072 · show in text ↑