Paper · 2025 · Frontiers in Agronomy

The effects of variety selection on the yield and productivity of sweetpotato-legume intercropping options in Malawi

Gbenga Moses Akinwale; Harvey Chalie; Obed J. Mwenye; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Crop diversification through integration of sweetpotato with legumes such as soybean presents a viable option for achieving food and nutrition security, income generation, soil fertility improvement, and adaptation to climate change in Malawi. However, knowledge regarding the choice of sweetpotato variety specifically adapted to intercropping systems remains a major obstacle to its optimization. The objective of the study was to evaluate three sweetpotato varieties under different intercropping systems. A field experiment was conducted using three Orange- fleshed Sweetpotato varieties (OFSP) with different vine length and growth habits (Kadyaubwerere -long vines, Royal choice-short vines, and Chipika - compact vines) under five spatial arrangements across three different agroecological zones during 2023–2024 cropping season. Five spatial arrangements including i) sole sweetpotato (Sole SP); ii) sole soybean (sole SB); iii) sweetpotato - soybean (1:1); iv) sweetpotato – soybean (2:1); and v) sweetpotato – soybean (2:2) were evaluated using a randomized complete block design in a split-plot arrangement with three replications. Agronomic data were subjected to analysis of variance using R programing. Land equivalent ratios (LERs) and absolute merit effect (AME) were also used to determine the productivity of the intercropping system. Variety architecture, locations, and intercropping systems significantly (P< 0.001) influenced the yields, and other traits of sweetpotato and soybean. Sweetpotato varieties responded differently under diverse spatial arrangements, indicating varietal effects on crop performance. LERs indicate significantly higher yield advantage in intercropping compared to sole cropping. LERs were greater than one (LER>1) in many of the intercrops, indicating higher productivity of intercropping over sole cropping. Across locations, Chipika and Royal choice sweetpotato varieties intercropped in ratios 1:1 and 2:1 gave the highest LERs as compared to Kadyaubwelere. The results suggest the combinations of Chipika-soybean in ratios 2:1 and 2:2 and Royal choice -soybean in ratios 1:1 and 2:2 for sweetpotato-intensification in Malawi due to the less competitiveness of the two varieties under the different intercropping arrangements.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety architecture, location and intercropping system significantly influenced the yields and other traits of sweetpotato and soybean.

Taxon
sweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
intercropping systemse1
Outcome
yieldse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sweetpotato-legume intercropping options in Malawi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–116 · show in text ↑
e1

“Variety architecture, locations, and intercropping systems significantly (P< 0.001) influenced the yields, and other traits of sweetpotato and soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1353–1503 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweetpotato varieties responded differently to the spatial arrangements, indicating varietal effects on crop performance.

Taxon
sweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Material
Sweetpotato varietiese2
Treatment
spatial arrangementse2
Outcome
crop performancee2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sweetpotato-legume intercropping options in Malawi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–116 · show in text ↑
e2

“Sweetpotato varieties responded differently under diverse spatial arrangements, indicating varietal effects on crop performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1505–1632 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping gave a significantly higher yield advantage than sole cropping, as shown by LERs.

Taxon
sweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
intercroppinge3
Outcome
yield advantagee3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
sole croppinge3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sweetpotato-legume intercropping options in Malawi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–116 · show in text ↑
e3

“LERs indicate significantly higher yield advantage in intercropping compared to sole cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1634–1727 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LERs were greater than one in many intercrops, indicating higher productivity of intercropping than sole cropping.

Taxon
sweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Outcome
LERse4
Direction
greatere4
Value
greater than one (LER>1)e4
Qualifier
in many of the intercropse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sweetpotato-legume intercropping options in Malawi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–116 · show in text ↑
e4

“LERs were greater than one (LER>1) in many of the intercrops, indicating higher productivity of intercropping over sole cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1729–1857 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chipika and Royal choice sweetpotato varieties intercropped in ratios 1:1 and 2:1 gave the highest LERs compared with Kadyaubwelere.

Taxon
sweetpotatoIpomoea batatase5
Material
Chipika and Royal choice sweetpotato varietiese5
Treatment
intercropped in ratios 1:1 and 2:1e5
Outcome
LERse5
Direction
higheste5
Comparator
Kadyaubweleree5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Chipika and Royal choice sweetpotato varieties intercropped in ratios 1:1 and 2:1 gave the highest LERs as compared to Kadyaubwelere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1877–2009 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Chipika and Royal choice intercropped with soybean in the stated ratios are suggested for sweetpotato intensification in Malawi.

Taxon
sweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Outcome
sweetpotato-intensificatione6
Qualifier
combinations of Chipika-soybean in ratios 2:1 and 2:2 and Royal choice -soybean in ratios 1:1 and 2:2e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sweetpotato-legume intercropping options in Malawi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–116 · show in text ↑
e6

“The results suggest the combinations of Chipika-soybean in ratios 2:1 and 2:2 and Royal choice -soybean in ratios 1:1 and 2:2 for sweetpotato-intensification in Malawi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2011–2178 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results differ

24 papers: 13 positive, 11 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. no effect

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.