Abstract
A study was conducted in guava to evaluate the effect of spacing and nutrient level and schedule on the vegetative parameters of guava under HDP system in Kerala. Experiment was laid out in split plot design with four levels of spacing as main plot and six fertilizer level as subplot treatments replicated thrice. The results indicated that plant height was significantly higher in closer spacing of 2.0 m × 1.5 m with 100% of fertilizer dose as per schedule -2 (S4F6; 1.23 m; 1.60 m) at 6 and 9 MAP. The highest plant girth (9.30 cm) and canopy spread in N-S direction (105.98 cm) were observed as a result of the interactive effect of 3.0 m × 3.0 m spacing with 100% of fertilizer dose as per schedule -2 (S1F6) at 6 MAP while at 9 MAP the highest values were obtained with 3.0 m × 3.0 m with 100% of fertilizer dose as per schedule -1 (S1F5) (13.15; 123.44 cm). Canopy spread in E-W direction was the highest in 3.0 m × 3.0 m spacing with 100% of fertilizer dose as per schedule -1 at 6 MAP (99.33 cm) and at 9 MAP 3.0 m x 3.0 m with 100% of fertilizer dose as per schedule -2 recorded the highest values (136.01 cm). Data on primary branch girth, secondary branch girth and pruned biomass showed that interactive effect has no significant effect at 6 and 9 MAP. The least number of days to shoot emergence (5.04) was observed in 3.0 m × 3.0 m with 100% of fertilizer dose as per schedule -2 at 9MAP. In conclusion, the growth parameters were observed to be better at highest spacing and nutrient dose (S1F6 and S1F5) except the plant height which was observed to be the highest with S4F6.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Guava plant height was higher at 1.23 m with 2.0 m × 1.5 m with 100% of fertilizer dose as per schedule -2 at 6 MAP.
- Taxon
- guava
Psidium guajavat0 - Treatment
- 2.0 m × 1.5 m with 100% of fertilizer dose as per schedule -2e0
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 1.23 me0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“guava (Psidium guajava L.)”
e0“plant height was significantly higher in closer spacing of 2.0 m × 1.5 m with 100% of fertilizer dose as per schedule -2 (S4F6; 1.23 m; 1.60 m) at 6 and 9 MAP”
Claim · model-written summary
Guava plant height was higher at 1.60 m with 2.0 m × 1.5 m with 100% of fertilizer dose as per schedule -2 at 9 MAP.
- Taxon
- guavaPsidium guajavat0
- Treatment
- 2.0 m × 1.5 m with 100% of fertilizer dose as per schedule -2e0
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 1.60 me0
- Qualifier
- 9 MAPe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“guava (Psidium guajava L.)”
e0“plant height was significantly higher in closer spacing of 2.0 m × 1.5 m with 100% of fertilizer dose as per schedule -2 (S4F6; 1.23 m; 1.60 m) at 6 and 9 MAP”
Claim · model-written summary
Guava plant girth was highest at 9.30 cm with 3.0 m × 3.0 m spacing with 100% of fertilizer dose as per schedule -2 at 6 MAP.
- Taxon
- guavaPsidium guajavat0
- Treatment
- 3.0 m × 3.0 m spacing with 100% of fertilizer dose as per schedule -2e1
- Outcome
- plant girthe1
- Direction
- higheste1
- Value
- 9.30 cme1
- Qualifier
- 6 MAPe1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“guava (Psidium guajava L.)”
e1“The highest plant girth (9.30 cm) and canopy spread in N-S direction (105.98 cm) were observed as a result of the interactive effect of 3.0 m × 3.0 m spacing with 100% of fertilizer dose as per schedule -2 (S1F6) at 6 MAP”
Claim · model-written summary
Guava canopy spread in N-S direction was highest at 105.98 cm with 3.0 m × 3.0 m spacing with 100% of fertilizer dose as per schedule -2 at 6 MAP.
- Taxon
- guavaPsidium guajavat0
- Treatment
- 3.0 m × 3.0 m spacing with 100% of fertilizer dose as per schedule -2e1
- Outcome
- canopy spread in N-S directione1
- Direction
- higheste1
- Value
- 105.98 cme1
- Qualifier
- 6 MAPe1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“guava (Psidium guajava L.)”
e1“The highest plant girth (9.30 cm) and canopy spread in N-S direction (105.98 cm) were observed as a result of the interactive effect of 3.0 m × 3.0 m spacing with 100% of fertilizer dose as per schedule -2 (S1F6) at 6 MAP”
Claim · model-written summary
Guava plant girth was highest at 13.15 with 3.0 m × 3.0 m with 100% of fertilizer dose as per schedule -1 at 9 MAP.
- Taxon
- guavaPsidium guajavat0
- Treatment
- 3.0 m × 3.0 m with 100% of fertilizer dose as per schedule -1e2
- Outcome
- plant girthe1
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 13.15e2
- Qualifier
- 9 MAPe2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“guava (Psidium guajava L.)”
e2“at 9 MAP the highest values were obtained with 3.0 m × 3.0 m with 100% of fertilizer dose as per schedule -1 (S1F5) (13.15; 123.44 cm)”
e1“The highest plant girth (9.30 cm) and canopy spread in N-S direction (105.98 cm) were observed as a result of the interactive effect of 3.0 m × 3.0 m spacing with 100% of fertilizer dose as per schedule -2 (S1F6) at 6 MAP”
Claim · model-written summary
Guava canopy spread in N-S direction was highest at 123.44 cm with 3.0 m × 3.0 m with 100% of fertilizer dose as per schedule -1 at 9 MAP.
- Taxon
- guavaPsidium guajavat0
- Treatment
- 3.0 m × 3.0 m with 100% of fertilizer dose as per schedule -1e2
- Outcome
- canopy spread in N-S directione1
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 123.44 cme2
- Qualifier
- 9 MAPe2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“guava (Psidium guajava L.)”
e2“at 9 MAP the highest values were obtained with 3.0 m × 3.0 m with 100% of fertilizer dose as per schedule -1 (S1F5) (13.15; 123.44 cm)”
e1“The highest plant girth (9.30 cm) and canopy spread in N-S direction (105.98 cm) were observed as a result of the interactive effect of 3.0 m × 3.0 m spacing with 100% of fertilizer dose as per schedule -2 (S1F6) at 6 MAP”
Claim · model-written summary
Guava Canopy spread in E-W direction was highest at 99.33 cm with 3.0 m × 3.0 m spacing with 100% of fertilizer dose as per schedule -1 at 6 MAP.
- Taxon
- guavaPsidium guajavat0
- Treatment
- 3.0 m × 3.0 m spacing with 100% of fertilizer dose as per schedule -1e3
- Outcome
- Canopy spread in E-W directione3
- Direction
- higheste3
- Value
- 99.33 cme3
- Qualifier
- 6 MAPe3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“guava (Psidium guajava L.)”
e3“Canopy spread in E-W direction was the highest in 3.0 m × 3.0 m spacing with 100% of fertilizer dose as per schedule -1 at 6 MAP (99.33 cm) and at 9 MAP 3.0 m x 3.0 m with 100% of fertilizer dose as per schedule -2 recorded the highest values (136.01 cm)”
Claim · model-written summary
Guava Canopy spread in E-W direction was highest at 136.01 cm with 3.0 m x 3.0 m with 100% of fertilizer dose as per schedule -2 at 9 MAP.
- Taxon
- guavaPsidium guajavat0
- Treatment
- 3.0 m x 3.0 m with 100% of fertilizer dose as per schedule -2e3
- Outcome
- Canopy spread in E-W directione3
- Direction
- higheste3
- Value
- 136.01 cme3
- Qualifier
- 9 MAPe3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“guava (Psidium guajava L.)”
e3“Canopy spread in E-W direction was the highest in 3.0 m × 3.0 m spacing with 100% of fertilizer dose as per schedule -1 at 6 MAP (99.33 cm) and at 9 MAP 3.0 m x 3.0 m with 100% of fertilizer dose as per schedule -2 recorded the highest values (136.01 cm)”
Claim · model-written summary
Guava number of days to shoot emergence was least at 5.04 with 3.0 m × 3.0 m with 100% of fertilizer dose as per schedule -2 at 9MAP.
- Taxon
- guavaPsidium guajavat0
- Treatment
- 3.0 m × 3.0 m with 100% of fertilizer dose as per schedule -2e5
- Outcome
- number of days to shoot emergencee5
- Direction
- leaste5
- Value
- 5.04e5
- Qualifier
- 9MAPe5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“guava (Psidium guajava L.)”
e5“The least number of days to shoot emergence (5.04) was observed in 3.0 m × 3.0 m with 100% of fertilizer dose as per schedule -2 at 9MAP.”
Claim · model-written summary
The spacing and fertilizer interaction had no significant effect on primary branch girth, secondary branch girth or pruned biomass at 6 and 9 MAP.
- Taxon
- guavaPsidium guajavat0
- Treatment
- interactive effecte4
- Outcome
- primary branch girth, secondary branch girth and pruned biomasse4
- Direction
- no significant effecte4
- Qualifier
- 6 and 9 MAPe4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“guava (Psidium guajava L.)”
e4“Data on primary branch girth, secondary branch girth and pruned biomass showed that interactive effect has no significant effect at 6 and 9 MAP.”
The same questions in other papers
density · growth · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →fertilization · growth · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results
55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
55 papers more in this group
See all 59 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.