Paper · 2025 · Scientific African

Spatiotemporal patterns and drivers of bean yield variability in Food-Deficit Countries

Riziki Moses Nassary; Boniface H.J. Massawe; Eliakira Kisetu Nassary

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

• First multi-country, decade-long analysis of bean yield variability in LIFDCs. • Integrated meta-analysis and statistical modelling revealed key yield drivers. • Temporal yield stability contrasts with wide spatial variability among nations. • Climatic effects (rainfall and temperature) dominate bean yield variability. • Principal component analysis explained 96% of bean yield variability. • We provide data-driven guidance for resilience and productivity enhancement. This study examines the spatiotemporal variability of common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) yields and their drivers across 32 Low-Income Food-Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) from 2013 to 2022, addressing the limited understanding of how yield patterns change across regions and over time. This knowledge is vital for enhancing food and nutritional security in resource-limited settings. The research combined standardized yield data from FAOSTAT with information from published studies and national field trials to conduct a longitudinal meta-analysis. It integrates meta-analysis and modeling across countries to expand understanding of bean yield variability. Statistical methods, including One-Way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis tests, and Principal Component Analysis (PCA), were employed to evaluate yield variability and identify key influencing factors. The results showed that temporal variability remained relatively stable, with no significant differences in mean or median yields over the decade (p > 0. 05), while average yields varied within ±1.5 t ha -1 among countries. Spatial differences were more notable, with Mali showing the highest variability (mean = 10.03 t ha -1 , SD = 3.5 t ha -1 ), Eritrea the lowest (mean = 2.15 t ha -1 , SD = 0.5 t ha -1 ), and Tanzania displaying moderate variability (mean = 2.25 t ha -1 , SD = 1.1 t ha -1 ). Outliers, such as Mali’s higher yield values, likely reflect data aggregation from irrigated or experimental systems, requiring cautious interpretation. Rainfall and temperature emerged as the primary climatic factors influencing inter- annual fluctuations. PCA results indicated that broad temporal dynamics (PC 1) explained 96% of yield variability, while localized influences (PC 2) accounted for only 2%. ANOVA confirmed the absence of significant temporal trends, suggesting that long-term stability outweighs short-term variability. The findings suggest that strengthening climate resilience, inputs, and infrastructure enhances bean yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean and median bean yields did not differ significantly across the decade.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarise1
Outcome
mean or median yieldse0
Direction
no significant differencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“temporal variability remained relatively stable, with no significant differences in mean or median yields over the decade (p > 0. 05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1478 · show in text ↑
e1

“common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–571 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average yields differed by ±1.5 t ha -1 among countries.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarise1
Outcome
average yieldse0
Value
±1.5 t ha -1e0
Setting
among countriese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“average yields varied within ±1.5 t ha -1 among countries.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1486–1544 · show in text ↑
e1

“common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–571 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mali had the highest reported yield variability.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarise1
Outcome
variabilitye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
SD = 3.5 t ha -1e0
Qualifier
mean = 10.03 t ha -1e0
Setting
Malie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mali showing the highest variability (mean = 10.03 t ha -1 , SD = 3.5 t ha -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1589–1668 · show in text ↑
e1

“common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–571 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eritrea had the lowest reported yield variability.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarise1
Outcome
loweste0
Direction
loweste0
Value
SD = 0.5 t ha -1e0
Qualifier
mean = 2.15 t ha -1e0
Setting
Eritreae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eritrea the lowest (mean = 2.15 t ha -1 , SD = 0.5 t ha -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1670–1730 · show in text ↑
e1

“common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–571 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tanzania had moderate yield variability.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarise1
Outcome
moderate variabilitye0
Value
SD = 1.1 t ha -1e0
Qualifier
mean = 2.25 t ha -1e0
Setting
Tanzaniae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tanzania displaying moderate variability (mean = 2.25 t ha -1 , SD = 1.1 t ha -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1736–1818 · show in text ↑
e1

“common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–571 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rainfall and temperature were primary drivers of interannual fluctuations.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarise1
Outcome
inter- annual fluctuationse0
Setting
Rainfall and temperaturee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rainfall and temperature emerged as the primary climatic factors influencing inter- annual fluctuations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1973–2077 · show in text ↑
e1

“common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–571 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PC 1 explained 96% of yield variability.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarise1
Outcome
yield variabilitye0
Value
96%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“broad temporal dynamics (PC 1) explained 96% of yield variability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2105–2170 · show in text ↑
e1

“common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–571 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PC 2 accounted for 2% of yield variability.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarise1
Outcome
yield variabilitye2
Value
2%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“localized influences (PC 2) accounted for only 2%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2178–2228 · show in text ↑
e1

“common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–571 · show in text ↑
e2

“yield variability, while localized influences (PC 2) accounted for only 2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2153–2227 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest strengthening climate resilience, inputs and infrastructure to enhance bean yield.

Taxon
beane0
Outcome
strengthening climate resilience, inputs, and infrastructure enhances bean yielde0

Verbatim

e0

“The findings suggest that strengthening climate resilience, inputs, and infrastructure enhances bean yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2359–2466 · show in text ↑