Paper · 2025 · PeerJ Computer Science

A novel YOLOv11 framework for enhanced tomato disease detection

Entesar Hamed I. Eliwa; Tarek Abd El-Hafeez

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Plant diseases severely threaten global agriculture, causing significant crop losses and jeopardizing food security. Traditional manual diagnostic methods are inefficient, time-consuming, and prone to human error, underscoring an urgent need for accurate, efficient, and scalable automated detection systems. While deep learning offers transformative potential, existing models often contend with high computational demands, limited scalability, and insufficient robustness for real-world agricultural deployment. This article presents a novel and highly efficient framework leveraging the cutting-edge You Only Look Once (YOLO)v11 architecture, enhanced with a sophisticated Attention-Guided Multi-Scale Feature Fusion (AGMS-FF) Enhancer, for the precise classification of 10 distinct diseases affecting tomato plants, alongside healthy specimens. Our proposed AGMS-FF module meticulously refines feature representations by integrating multi-scale convolutional paths with both channel and spatial attention mechanisms, all supported by residual connections to improve feature learning and model stability. The framework was rigorously evaluated on the extensive Zekeriya Tomato Disease Model dataset, comprising 42,606 annotated images (4,260 in the test set). Our enhanced YOLOv11 model achieved an outstanding overall accuracy of 99.93%, demonstrating exceptional performance across all disease classes, with many reaching perfect 100.00% precision, recall, and F1-scores. A comprehensive ablation study confirmed the efficacy of the AGMS-FF components, showing that while the baseline YOLOv11 already achieved near-perfect accuracy, the enhanced variants maintained this high level of performance with slightly varied metrics ( e.g ., 99.84% accuracy for full AGMS-FF), underscoring the robust and stable nature of our additions even at performance saturation points. Furthermore, the model exhibited excellent computational efficiency, with a training duration of 126 min, inference time of 31.4 ms, memory usage of 3.2 GB, and a throughput of 38.2 FPS. These results collectively establish a new state-of-the-art in tomato disease classification, providing a powerful, accurate, and computationally practical solution. The developed framework significantly bridges the gap between advanced deep-learning research and practical agricultural deployment, offering real-time diagnostic capabilities essential for enhancing crop health, optimizing yields, and bolstering global food security.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enhanced YOLOv11 achieved 99.93% overall accuracy for tomato disease classification.

Outcome
overall accuracye0
Value
99.93%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Our enhanced YOLOv11 model achieved an outstanding overall accuracy of 99.93%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1340 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–45 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Many disease classes reached 100.00% precision, recall and F1 scores.

Outcome
precision, recall, and F1-scorese0
Value
100.00%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“many reaching perfect 100.00% precision, recall, and F1-scores”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1475 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–45 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The full AGMS-FF variant achieved 99.84% accuracy.

Outcome
accuracye0
Value
99.84%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“99.84% accuracy for full AGMS-FF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1740–1772 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–45 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The model required 126 min for training.

Outcome
training duratione0
Value
126 mine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“training duration of 126 min”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1949–1977 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–45 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The model inference time was 31.4 ms.

Outcome
inference timee0
Value
31.4 mse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inference time of 31.4 ms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1979–2004 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–45 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The model used 3.2 GB of memory.

Outcome
memory usagee0
Value
3.2 GBe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“memory usage of 3.2 GB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2006–2028 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–45 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The model throughput was 38.2 FPS.

Outcome
throughpute0
Value
38.2 FPSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“throughput of 38.2 FPS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2036–2058 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–45 · show in text ↑