Paper · 2025 · AgriEngineering

Vineyard Groundcover Biodiversity: Using Deep Learning to Differentiate Cover Crop Communities from Aerial RGB Imagery

Isabella Ghiglieno; Girma Tariku Woldesemayat; Andres Sanchez Morchio; et al.

4
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Monitoring groundcover diversity in vineyards is a complex task, often limited by the time and expertise required for accurate botanical identification. Remote sensing technologies and AI-based tools are still underutilized in this context, particularly for classifying herbaceous vegetation in inter-row areas. In this study, we introduce a novel approach to classify the groundcover into one of nine categories, in order to simplify this task. Using UAV images to train a convolutional neural network through a deep learning methodology, this study evaluates the effectiveness of different backbone structures applied to a UNet network for the classification of pixels into nine classes of groundcover: vine canopy, bare soil, and seven distinct cover crop community types. Our results demonstrate that the UNet model, especially when using an EfficientNetB0 backbone, significantly improves classification performance, achieving 85.4% accuracy, 59.8% mean Intersection over Union (IoU), and a Jaccard index of 73.0%. Although this study demonstrates the potential of integrating remote sensing and deep learning for vineyard biodiversity monitoring, its applicability is limited by the small image coverage, as data were collected from a single vineyard and only one drone flight. Future work will focus on expanding the model’s applicability to a broader range of vineyard systems, soil types, and geographic regions, as well as testing its performance on lower-resolution multispectral imagery to reduce data acquisition costs and time, enabling large-scale and cost-effective monitoring.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A UNet with an EfficientNetB0 backbone classified vineyard groundcover with 85.4% accuracy.

Taxon
cover crope3
Treatment
EfficientNetB0 backbonee2
Outcome
accuracye1
Value
85.4%e1

Verbatim

e1

“achieving 85.4% accuracy, 59.8% mean Intersection over Union (IoU), and a Jaccard index of 73.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1018 · show in text ↑
e2

“especially when using an EfficientNetB0 backbone, significantly improves classification performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–920 · show in text ↑
e3

“seven distinct cover crop community types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–774 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same UNet model reached a mean Intersection over Union of 59.8% for groundcover classes.

Taxon
cover crope3
Treatment
EfficientNetB0 backbonee2
Outcome
mean Intersection over Union (IoU)e1
Value
59.8%e1

Verbatim

e1

“achieving 85.4% accuracy, 59.8% mean Intersection over Union (IoU), and a Jaccard index of 73.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1018 · show in text ↑
e2

“especially when using an EfficientNetB0 backbone, significantly improves classification performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–920 · show in text ↑
e3

“seven distinct cover crop community types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–774 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same UNet model reached a Jaccard index of 73.0% for groundcover classes.

Taxon
cover crope3
Treatment
EfficientNetB0 backbonee2
Outcome
Jaccard indexe1
Value
73.0%e1

Verbatim

e1

“achieving 85.4% accuracy, 59.8% mean Intersection over Union (IoU), and a Jaccard index of 73.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1018 · show in text ↑
e2

“especially when using an EfficientNetB0 backbone, significantly improves classification performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–920 · show in text ↑
e3

“seven distinct cover crop community types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–774 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The UNet with the EfficientNetB0 backbone significantly improved classification performance relative to the other backbone structures evaluated.

Taxon
cover crope3
Treatment
EfficientNetB0 backbonee2
Outcome
classification performancee2
Direction
improvese2
Comparator
different backbone structurese4

Verbatim

e2

“especially when using an EfficientNetB0 backbone, significantly improves classification performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–920 · show in text ↑
e3

“seven distinct cover crop community types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–774 · show in text ↑
e4

“evaluates the effectiveness of different backbone structures applied to a UNet network”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–637 · show in text ↑