Paper · 2025 · Annals of Forest Science

Inoculation success of Inonotus obliquus (Ach. ex Pers.) Pilát in birch (Betula pendula Roth, B. pubescens Ehrh.) and alder (Alnus incana (L.) Moench, A. glutinosa (L.) Gaertn.) in Estonia

Karin Kütt; Kalev Adamson; Katrin Jürimaa; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Key message This is the first study to investigate the success of inoculation of Alnus incana and A. glutinosa with Inonotus obliquus (Ach. ex Pers.) Pilát, providing new insights about the potential cultivation of this valuable fungus under field conditions. Results show that conks developed slowly under natural conditions. The development of the fungus observed in A. glutinosa suggests that this species may be as suitable a host for I. obliquus than birches. Furthermore, visible stem symptoms proved unreliable for detecting infection, highlighting the importance of molecular diagnostics for accurate assessment. Context Inonotus obliquus (Ach. ex Pers.) Pilát (commonly known as Chaga) is a medicinal fungus traditionally harvested from birch trees. Artificial cultivation is increasingly considered due to a rising commercial demand. However, our knowledge remains limited regarding infection dynamics and conk development on different host species. Aims We assessed the success of I. obliquus inoculation in Betula pendula , B. pubescens , Alnus incana , and A. glutinosa stands 2 years after inoculation in order to: (i) identify the most susceptible host tree species and the most effective I. obliquus strains for cultivation; (ii) assess the frequency of conk formation under hemiboreal conditions; investigate whether (iii) visible symptoms on stems resulted from I. obliquus infection and (iv) mechanical wounding influenced fungal establishment. Methods The experiment was conducted at two locations in Estonia, encompassing a total of six forest sites, with inoculation success assessed using species-specific qPCR. Sterile conk development was additionally monitored visually 4 years post-inoculation. Results Inoculation success differed between the two locations, with an infection rate of 18% observed at Järvselja and 3% at Võrumaa . Three fungal strains consistently achieved higher infection rates among the six tested ones. Conks developed only on A. glutinosa trees and with specific strains. Only the identity of the fungal strains resulted in a significant effect on infection ess. Visible stem symptoms, such as bleeding and bulging, were unreliable indicators of the infection rate. Conclusion I. obliquus conks developed more rapidly on A. glutinosa compared to B. pendula , B. pubescens , and A. incana . Moreover, fungal strains play a crucial role in determining cultivation success.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infection rate was 18% at Järvselja.

Taxon
bircht0
Interactor
Inonotus obliquusInonotus obliquust0pathogen
Outcome
infection ratee0
Value
18%e0
Setting
Järvseljae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Inonotus obliquus
Inonotus obliquus · InteractorTocekas · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an infection rate of 18% observed at Järvselja”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1800–1846 · show in text ↑
t0

“Inonotus obliquus (Ach. ex Pers.) Pilát in birch (Betula pendula Roth, B. pubescens Ehrh.) and alder (Alnus incana (L.) Moench, A. glutinosa (L.) Gaertn.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–177 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infection rate was 3% at Võrumaa.

Taxon
bircht0
Interactor
Inonotus obliquusInonotus obliquust0pathogen
Outcome
infection ratee1
Value
3%e0
Setting
Võrumaae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Inonotus obliquus
Inonotus obliquus · InteractorTocekas · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“3% at Võrumaa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1851–1864 · show in text ↑
t0

“Inonotus obliquus (Ach. ex Pers.) Pilát in birch (Betula pendula Roth, B. pubescens Ehrh.) and alder (Alnus incana (L.) Moench, A. glutinosa (L.) Gaertn.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–177 · show in text ↑
e1

“an infection rate of 18% observed at Järvselja”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1800–1846 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three fungal strains had higher infection rates among six strains.

Taxon
bircht0
Interactor
Inonotus obliquusInonotus obliquust0pathogen
Outcome
infection ratese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
six tested onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Inonotus obliquus
Inonotus obliquus · InteractorTocekas · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three fungal strains consistently achieved higher infection rates among the six tested ones.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1867–1959 · show in text ↑
t0

“Inonotus obliquus (Ach. ex Pers.) Pilát in birch (Betula pendula Roth, B. pubescens Ehrh.) and alder (Alnus incana (L.) Moench, A. glutinosa (L.) Gaertn.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–177 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conks developed only on A. glutinosa with specific strains.

Taxon
A. glutinosaAlnus glutinosae0
Interactor
Inonotus obliquusInonotus obliquust0pathogen
Outcome
Conks developed onlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alnus glutinosa
Alnus glutinosa · TaxonAEngelhardt · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Inonotus obliquus
Inonotus obliquus · InteractorTocekas · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conks developed only on A. glutinosa trees and with specific strains.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1960–2029 · show in text ↑
t0

“Inonotus obliquus (Ach. ex Pers.) Pilát in birch (Betula pendula Roth, B. pubescens Ehrh.) and alder (Alnus incana (L.) Moench, A. glutinosa (L.) Gaertn.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–177 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal strain identity significantly affected infection success.

Taxon
bircht0
Interactor
Inonotus obliquusInonotus obliquust0pathogen
Outcome
infection esse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Inonotus obliquus
Inonotus obliquus · InteractorTocekas · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Only the identity of the fungal strains resulted in a significant effect on infection ess.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2030–2120 · show in text ↑
t0

“Inonotus obliquus (Ach. ex Pers.) Pilát in birch (Betula pendula Roth, B. pubescens Ehrh.) and alder (Alnus incana (L.) Moench, A. glutinosa (L.) Gaertn.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–177 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Visible stem symptoms were unreliable infection indicators.

Taxon
bircht0
Interactor
Inonotus obliquusInonotus obliquust0pathogen
Outcome
unreliable indicators of the infection ratee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Inonotus obliquus
Inonotus obliquus · InteractorTocekas · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Visible stem symptoms, such as bleeding and bulging, were unreliable indicators of the infection rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2121–2223 · show in text ↑
t0

“Inonotus obliquus (Ach. ex Pers.) Pilát in birch (Betula pendula Roth, B. pubescens Ehrh.) and alder (Alnus incana (L.) Moench, A. glutinosa (L.) Gaertn.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–177 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conks developed more rapidly on A. glutinosa than on the other tested trees.

Taxon
A. glutinosaAlnus glutinosae0
Interactor
I. obliquusInonotus obliquuse0pathogen
Outcome
conks developede0
Direction
more rapidlye0
Comparator
B. pendula , B. pubescens , and A. incanae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alnus glutinosa
Alnus glutinosa · TaxonAEngelhardt · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Inonotus obliquus
Inonotus obliquus · InteractorTocekas · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“I. obliquus conks developed more rapidly on A. glutinosa compared to B. pendula , B. pubescens , and A. incana .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2235–2347 · show in text ↑
t0

“Inonotus obliquus (Ach. ex Pers.) Pilát in birch (Betula pendula Roth, B. pubescens Ehrh.) and alder (Alnus incana (L.) Moench, A. glutinosa (L.) Gaertn.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–177 · show in text ↑