Paper · 2025 · Journal of Fungi

Phytomycobiomes and Ecosystem Services: Mechanisms, Evidence and Routes to Application

Rizwan Ali Ansari; Kobilov Ergash Egamberdievich; Madjidova Tanzila Raximovna; et al.

8
claims
24
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Phytomycobiomes refer to the fungal consortia that inhabit plant tissues and the rhizosphere. Their documented functions include nutrient mobilization, carbon retention, stress mitigation and pathogen suppression, although measurable effects often depend on plant and soil conditions. In this review, we examine the current evidence for their ecological relevance and assess the molecular approaches most commonly used to characterize them. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal (AM) fungi, endophytes and saprotrophic taxa indicate measurable gains in nutrient acquisition, disease resistance and soil aggregation, although long-term consistency is rarely evaluated. Each function appears to have an explicit mechanistic attribution, with direct links between fungal groups, enzymatic pathways and measurable ecosystem outcomes. Several sequencing-based techniques are available, yet none offer complete accuracy. Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) amplicon surveys provide rapid taxonomic coverage but suffer from primer bias; shotgun metagenomics offers functional insight but at significant financial cost; and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assays remain useful for targeted quantification, whereas long-read technologies show promise but still lack widespread adoption. The field faces a number of unresolved constraints, including limited knowledge of host range, inconsistent performance under fluctuating environmental conditions and the absence of a standardized bioinformatic pipeline. Despite these limitations, we regard phytomycobiomes as viable candidates for replacing or reducing synthetic inputs, provided their application is guided by context-specific evidence rather than broad generalization.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedreview summarypositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi show measurable gains in plant nutrient acquisition.

Taxon
plante1
Interactor
Arbuscular Mycorrhizal (AM) fungie0symbiont
Outcome
nutrient acquisitione0
Direction
gainse0

Verbatim

e0

“Arbuscular Mycorrhizal (AM) fungi, endophytes and saprotrophic taxa indicate measurable gains in nutrient acquisition, disease resistance and soil aggregation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–599 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phytomycobiomes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑
e1

“plant tissues and the rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedreview summarypositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Endophytes show measurable gains in disease resistance.

Taxon
plante1
Interactor
endophytese0symbiont
Outcome
disease resistancee0
Direction
gainse0

Verbatim

e0

“Arbuscular Mycorrhizal (AM) fungi, endophytes and saprotrophic taxa indicate measurable gains in nutrient acquisition, disease resistance and soil aggregation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–599 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phytomycobiomes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑
e1

“plant tissues and the rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Saprotrophic taxa show measurable gains in soil aggregation.

Taxon
plante1
Interactor
saprotrophic taxae0other
Outcome
soil aggregatione0
Direction
gainse0

Verbatim

e0

“Arbuscular Mycorrhizal (AM) fungi, endophytes and saprotrophic taxa indicate measurable gains in nutrient acquisition, disease resistance and soil aggregation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–599 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phytomycobiomes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑
e1

“plant tissues and the rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–92 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

ITS amplicon surveys give rapid taxonomic coverage but have primer bias.

Taxon
plante1
Outcome
rapid taxonomic coveragee0
Qualifier
primer biase0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) amplicon surveys provide rapid taxonomic coverage but suffer from primer bias”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1011 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phytomycobiomes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑
e1

“plant tissues and the rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–92 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Shotgun metagenomics provides functional insight at significant financial cost.

Taxon
plante1
Outcome
functional insighte0
Qualifier
significant financial coste0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“shotgun metagenomics offers functional insight but at significant financial cost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1093 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phytomycobiomes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑
e1

“plant tissues and the rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–92 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

qPCR assays remain useful for targeted quantification.

Taxon
plante1
Outcome
targeted quantificatione0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assays remain useful for targeted quantification”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1193 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phytomycobiomes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑
e1

“plant tissues and the rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–92 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Long-read technologies show promise but lack widespread adoption.

Taxon
plante1
Outcome
show promisee0
Qualifier
lack widespread adoptione0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“long-read technologies show promise but still lack widespread adoption”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1273 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phytomycobiomes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑
e1

“plant tissues and the rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–92 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors regard phytomycobiomes as candidates to reduce synthetic inputs when guided by context-specific evidence.

Taxon
plante1
Outcome
replacing or reducing synthetic inputse0
Qualifier
provided their application is guided by context-specific evidencee0

Verbatim

e0

“we regard phytomycobiomes as viable candidates for replacing or reducing synthetic inputs, provided their application is guided by context-specific evidence rather than broad generalization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1712 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phytomycobiomes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑
e1

“plant tissues and the rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–92 · show in text ↑