Abstract
An experiment was conducted to evaluate various integrated nutrient management packages to evaluate the yield, quality and economics of banana (Musa × paradisaca L.) cultivation during 2008-2010. The response of INM on economics of tissue cultured banana cv. Grand Naine indicated that the overall cost of cultivation as well as economics of banana production was significantly influenced by integration of biofertilizers, organic manure and inorganic fertilizers. Among the different treatments, highest expenditure of ₹ 264 110.00 per ha was incurred in 100% RDF + VAM + Azospirillum + PSB + Trichoderma harzianum. However, the same treatment recorded the highest gross as well as net income. In spite of maximum cost of cultivation, the highest cost benefit ratio of 4.22:1 was also recorded in this treatment, followed by 75% RDF +VAM + Azospirillum + PSB + Trichoderma harzianum.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated biofertilizers, organic manure, and inorganic fertilizers significantly influenced banana cultivation cost and economics.
- Taxon
- bananae0
- Material
- Grand Nainee0
- Treatment
- integration of biofertilizers, organic manure and inorganic fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- overall cost of cultivation as well as economics of banana productione0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“The response of INM on economics of tissue cultured banana cv. Grand Naine indicated that the overall cost of cultivation as well as economics of banana production was significantly influenced by integration of biofertilizers, organic manure and inorganic fertilizers”
Claim · model-written summary
The 100% RDF plus microbial and fungal package had the highest banana cultivation expenditure, ₹ 264 110.00 per ha.
- Taxon
- bananat0
- Treatment
- 100% RDF + VAM + Azospirillum + PSB + Trichoderma harzianume0
- Outcome
- expendituree0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- ₹ 264 110.00 per hae0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“highest expenditure of ₹ 264 110.00 per ha was incurred in 100% RDF + VAM + Azospirillum + PSB + Trichoderma harzianum”
t0“banana”
Claim · model-written summary
The same treatment recorded the highest gross and net banana income.
- Taxon
- bananat0
- Treatment
- 100% RDF + VAM + Azospirillum + PSB + Trichoderma harzianume0
- Outcome
- gross as well as net incomee0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“banana”
e0“highest expenditure of ₹ 264 110.00 per ha was incurred in 100% RDF + VAM + Azospirillum + PSB + Trichoderma harzianum. However, the same treatment recorded the highest gross as well as net income”
Claim · model-written summary
The same treatment had the highest banana cost benefit ratio, 4.22:1.
Verbatim
t0“banana”
e0“the highest cost benefit ratio of 4.22:1 was also recorded in this treatment, followed by 75% RDF +VAM + Azospirillum + PSB + Trichoderma harzianum”
e1“100% RDF + VAM + Azospirillum + PSB + Trichoderma harzianum”
The same questions in other papers
Trichoderma harzianum · yield · MusaResults agree
7 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Azospirillum · yield · MusaResults agree
11 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →fertilization · yield · MusaPositive and negative results
117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
124 papers more in this group
See all 128 papers →mycorrhiza · yield · MusaResults agree
9 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.