Paper · 2009

Stripe rust resistance of different wheat varieties.

Long Ling; Liu HongMei; Feng MingYi; et al.

11
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The results from studying stripe rust resistance of 16 wheat varieties planted in Bijie prefecture during 2005-2007 showed that there was significant difference in stripe rust resistance among 16 wheat varieties.Bimai 17,Qianmai 15,Chuannong 19,Bimai 16,Biyin 88,Biyanpu 3 and Qianmai 16 was middle or high resistance to stripe rust,Apo and Chuanmai 107 was middle or high susceptive to stripe rust,and Guangtoumai and Dunbanmai was high susceptive to stripe rust.The performance of stripe rust resistance of Chuannong 18 and Chuannong 16 was from middle susceptibility to high resistance,the performance of stripe rust resistance of Guimai 2 was from high susceptibility to middle resistance and the performance of stripe rust resistance of Mianyang 29 and Neimai 8 was from middle susceptibility to middle resistance.There was significant difference in resistant performance of tested wheat varieties in different years.Therefore,the variety arrangement should be scientifically determined according to their stripe rust resistance in local performance in wheat production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Stripe rust resistance differed significantly among 16 wheat varieties.

Outcome
stripe rust resistancee0
Value
16e0
Setting
Bijie prefecturee1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was significant difference in stripe rust resistance among 16 wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 128–211 · show in text ↑
e1

“planted in Bijie prefecture during 2005-2007”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–115 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bimai 17, Qianmai 15 and Chuannong 19 showed middle or high stripe rust resistance.

Material
Bimai 17,Qianmai 15,Chuannong 19e0
Outcome
middle or high resistance to stripe ruste0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bimai 17,Qianmai 15,Chuannong 19,Bimai 16,Biyin 88,Biyanpu 3 and Qianmai 16 was middle or high resistance to stripe rust”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–332 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bimai 16, Biyin 88 and Biyanpu 3 showed middle or high stripe rust resistance.

Material
Bimai 16,Biyin 88,Biyanpu 3e0
Outcome
middle or high resistance to stripe ruste0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bimai 16,Biyin 88,Biyanpu 3 and Qianmai 16 was middle or high resistance to stripe rust”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–332 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Qianmai 16 showed middle or high stripe rust resistance.

Material
Qianmai 16e0
Outcome
middle or high resistance to stripe ruste0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Qianmai 16 was middle or high resistance to stripe rust”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–332 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apo and Chuanmai 107 showed middle or high susceptibility to stripe rust.

Material
Apo and Chuanmai 107e0
Outcome
middle or high susceptive to stripe ruste0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Apo and Chuanmai 107 was middle or high susceptive to stripe rust”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–398 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Guangtoumai and Dunbanmai showed high susceptibility to stripe rust.

Material
Guangtoumai and Dunbanmaie0
Outcome
high susceptive to stripe ruste0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Guangtoumai and Dunbanmai was high susceptive to stripe rust”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 403–463 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chuannong 18 and Chuannong 16 ranged from middle susceptibility to high resistance.

Material
Chuannong 18 and Chuannong 16e0
Outcome
from middle susceptibility to high resistancee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chuannong 18 and Chuannong 16 was from middle susceptibility to high resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–588 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Guimai 2 ranged from high susceptibility to middle resistance.

Material
Guimai 2e0
Outcome
from high susceptibility to middle resistancee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Guimai 2 was from high susceptibility to middle resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–692 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mianyang 29 and Neimai 8 ranged from middle susceptibility to middle resistance.

Material
Mianyang 29 and Neimai 8e0
Outcome
from middle susceptibility to middle resistancee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mianyang 29 and Neimai 8 was from middle susceptibility to middle resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–818 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistance performance of the tested wheat varieties differed significantly between years.

Outcome
resistant performancee0
Qualifier
different yearse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was significant difference in resistant performance of tested wheat varieties in different years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–922 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend choosing wheat variety arrangements based on local stripe rust resistance performance.

Outcome
variety arrangement should be scientifically determined according to their stripe rust resistance in local performancee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the variety arrangement should be scientifically determined according to their stripe rust resistance in local performance in wheat production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1075 · show in text ↑