Paper · 2010 · JOURNAL OF WEED SCIENCE RESEARCH

Response of chickpea and its weeds to tillage systems using varying seed rates and phosphorus levels.

Khalid Ali; Amanullah Jan; Ijaz Ahmad; et al.

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The experiment on the response of chickpea and its weeds to tillage systems (Conventional and zero) using varying seed rates (40, 80, 120 kg ha-1) and phosphorous levels (0, 80,120 Kg ha-1) was investigated at Agriculture Research Farm, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Agricultural University Peshawar, Pakistan during rabi season 2002-2003. Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with split plot arrangement with four replications was used for the experiment. Plots seeded (S) at the rate of 80 kg ha-1 were at par with 120 kg ha-1 for plant height (73 cm) and number of nodules plant-1 (71). Phosphorous (P) applied at the rate of 80 Kg ha-1 had significantly higher number of nodules plant-1 (83) and dry weight of nodules plant -1 (419 mg). Statistical analysis of the data revealed that tillage system, seed rates, phosphorous levels and the interaction between seed rate and phosphorous levels (SxP) had a significant effect on weed biomass m-2. The higher weed biomass of 212 g m-2 as compared to conventional tillage was recorded for zero tillage system. The maximum weed biomass of 222 g m-2 was recorded in plots seeded @ 40 kg ha-1 while minimum value of 156 g m-2 was recorded in plots planted @ 120 kg ha-1. Similarly Minimum biomass of weeds (181 g m-2) was recorded in plots without P, while maximum biomass of 199 g m-2 was recorded in plots receiving 120 kg P ha-1. It is deciphered from the data that the conventional tillage had lower weeds biomass than the zero tillage system. For the effect of seed rate it was noticed that weeds biomass decreased with increase in number of plants per unit area as seed rates of 120 kg ha-1 had minimum weeds biomass (156 g) as compared to the other two seed rates. Thus, conventional tillage under higher seed rates is recommended for weed suppression and increased chickpea production in the area. Key words: Seed rates, phosphorus levels, tillage systems. 1 Department

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An 80 kg ha-1 chickpea seed rate matched 120 kg ha-1 for plant height of 73 cm.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
80 kg ha-1e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
at pare0
Value
73 cme0
Comparator
120 kg ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plots seeded (S) at the rate of 80 kg ha-1 were at par with 120 kg ha-1 for plant height (73 cm) and number of nodules plant-1 (71).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–581 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An 80 kg ha-1 chickpea seed rate matched 120 kg ha-1 for 71 nodules per plant.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
80 kg ha-1e0
Outcome
number of nodules plant-1e0
Direction
at pare0
Value
71e0
Comparator
120 kg ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plots seeded (S) at the rate of 80 kg ha-1 were at par with 120 kg ha-1 for plant height (73 cm) and number of nodules plant-1 (71).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–581 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus at 80 Kg ha-1 significantly increased chickpea nodules per plant to 83.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Phosphorous (P) applied at the rate of 80 Kg ha-1e0
Outcome
number of nodules plant-1e0
Direction
highere0
Value
83e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorous (P) applied at the rate of 80 Kg ha-1 had significantly higher number of nodules plant-1 (83) and dry weight of nodules plant -1 (419 mg).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–732 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus at 80 Kg ha-1 significantly increased chickpea nodule dry weight to 419 mg.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Phosphorous (P) applied at the rate of 80 Kg ha-1e0
Outcome
dry weight of nodules plant -1e0
Direction
highere0
Value
419 mge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorous (P) applied at the rate of 80 Kg ha-1 had significantly higher number of nodules plant-1 (83) and dry weight of nodules plant -1 (419 mg).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–732 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–20 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage, seed rate, phosphorus and seed-rate-by-phosphorus interaction significantly affected weed biomass.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
weed biomass m-2e0
Qualifier
tillage system, seed rates, phosphorous levels and the interaction between seed rate and phosphorous levels (SxP)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Statistical analysis of the data revealed that tillage system, seed rates, phosphorous levels and the interaction between seed rate and phosphorous levels (SxP) had a significant effect on weed biomass m-2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–939 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage produced 212 g m-2 weed biomass, higher than conventional tillage.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
zero tillage systeme0
Outcome
weed biomasse0
Direction
highere0
Value
212 g m-2e0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The higher weed biomass of 212 g m-2 as compared to conventional tillage was recorded for zero tillage system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1050 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 40 kg ha-1 seed rate gave the maximum weed biomass of 222 g m-2.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
40 kg ha-1e0
Outcome
weed biomasse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
222 g m-2e0
Comparator
120 kg ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum weed biomass of 222 g m-2 was recorded in plots seeded @ 40 kg ha-1 while minimum value of 156 g m-2 was recorded in plots planted @ 120 kg ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1208 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 120 kg ha-1 seed rate gave the minimum weed biomass of 156 g m-2.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
120 kg ha-1e0
Outcome
weed biomasse0
Direction
minimume0
Value
156 g m-2e0
Comparator
40 kg ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum weed biomass of 222 g m-2 was recorded in plots seeded @ 40 kg ha-1 while minimum value of 156 g m-2 was recorded in plots planted @ 120 kg ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1208 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No phosphorus produced the minimum weed biomass, 181 g m-2.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
without Pe0
Outcome
biomass of weedse0
Direction
Minimume0
Value
181 g m-2e0
Comparator
120 kg P ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly Minimum biomass of weeds (181 g m-2) was recorded in plots without P, while maximum biomass of 199 g m-2 was recorded in plots receiving 120 kg P ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1370 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus at 120 kg P ha-1 produced maximum weed biomass of 199 g m-2.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
120 kg P ha-1e0
Outcome
biomass of weedse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
199 g m-2e0
Comparator
without Pe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly Minimum biomass of weeds (181 g m-2) was recorded in plots without P, while maximum biomass of 199 g m-2 was recorded in plots receiving 120 kg P ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1370 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–20 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend conventional tillage with higher seed rates to suppress weeds and increase chickpea production.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
conventional tillage under higher seed ratese0
Outcome
weed suppression and increased chickpea productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thus, conventional tillage under higher seed rates is recommended for weed suppression and increased chickpea production in the area.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1710–1843 · show in text ↑

tillage · weed · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.