Paper · 2025 · EPJ Web of Conferences

Development of a smart tomato sorting system using naïve bayes algorithm based on color, size, and weight

Firmansyah Adiputra; Achmad Zain Nur; M. Aris Susanto; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Post-harvest sorting plays a crucial role in ensuring product quality and market consistency, yet manual tomato grading often suffers from low accuracy and inconsistent results due to human subjectivity. To address this issue, this study proposes an automated tomato sorting system that integrates multi-sensor data with the Naïve Bayes classification algorithm as an efficient alternative to manual sorting. The research contribution is the development and experimental validation of a low-cost, physics-based decision support system that fuses color, size, and weight information for tomato quality classification. The system employs a TCS230 color sensor, an ultrasonic sensor for size estimation, and a load-cell sensor for weight measurement, with all features processed using the Naïve Bayes algorithm to categorize tomatoes into Class 1 (premium), Class 2 (medium), and Class 3 (standard). Experimental results show that the system achieves an accuracy of approximately 92%, with strong performance for clearly distinguishable classes and reduced performance for tomatoes with irregular coloration or shape variations. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of probabilistic sensor fusion for improving post-harvest tomato sorting, and further improvements may include expanded datasets, enhanced calibration, and integration of computer-vision features for increased robustness.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tomato sorter achieved approximately 92% classification accuracy.

Outcome
accuracye0
Value
approximately 92%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the system achieves an accuracy of approximately 92%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–980 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato sorting system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–44 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tomato sorter performed strongly on clearly distinguishable classes.

Outcome
strong performancee0
Comparator
clearly distinguishable classese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with strong performance for clearly distinguishable classes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1041 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato sorting system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–44 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tomato sorter performed less well on tomatoes with irregular color or shape.

Outcome
performancee0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
tomatoes with irregular coloration or shape variationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced performance for tomatoes with irregular coloration or shape variations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1124 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato sorting system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–44 · show in text ↑