Paper · 2025 · Agronomy

A Quantitative Interpretability-Guided Network for Enhanced Wheat Seedling Detection

Yan Li; Suyi Liu; Xuerui Qi; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Seedling count is a key indicator of wheat population during the seedling stage. Accurate seedling detection is therefore vital. Recently, deep learning techniques have been widely used to detect wheat seedlings and estimate seedling numbers from UAV images. However, existing models lack interpretability, resulting in unclear internal processes and making reliable optimization difficult. Consequently, directly applying deep learning for wheat seedling detection often does not yield optimal results. To facilitate this study, we constructed an RGB image dataset captured by the DJI ZENMUSE X4S during the wheat emergence stage. We introduced a model interpretation method that employs network dissection and Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) to quantitatively assess the contribution of each network layer to wheat seedling detection. The results show that grayscale inputs elicited the highest responses in the early layers. Based on this, we propose a dual-input wheat seedling detection model that uses both the original image and its grayscale version, fusing their features in the early network layers. The combination of grayscale images improves wheat seedling detection performance. Experimental results demonstrate that our method outperformed the benchmark and traditional object detection techniques, achieving an AP50 of 90.2%, with a recall of 0.88 and a precision of 0.90. The proposed model not only improved AP50 but also reduced the missed detection rate, making wheat detection results more reliable. This approach enhances the robustness, generalization, and interpretability of deep learning models, offering an innovative and highly effective solution for increasing the accuracy and reliability of wheat seedling detection.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early model layers responded most strongly to grayscale images.

Outcome
responses in the early layerse0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
grayscale inputse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grayscale inputs elicited the highest responses in the early layers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–948 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding grayscale images improved wheat seedling detection performance.

Outcome
seedling detection performancee0
Direction
improvese0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combination of grayscale images improves wheat seedling detection performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1213 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The proposed method outperformed benchmark and traditional detectors.

Outcome
outperformede0
Direction
outperformede0
Comparator
the benchmark and traditional object detection techniquese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“our method outperformed the benchmark and traditional object detection techniques”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1334 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The method reached AP50 of 90.2%.

Outcome
AP50e0
Value
90.2%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“achieving an AP50 of 90.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1362 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The method reached recall of 0.88.

Outcome
recalle0
Value
0.88e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with a recall of 0.88”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1364–1385 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The method reached precision of 0.90.

Outcome
precisione0
Value
0.90e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and a precision of 0.90”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1386–1409 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The proposed model reduced missed detections.

Outcome
missed detection ratee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The proposed model not only improved AP50 but also reduced the missed detection rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1495 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑