Paper · 2025 · Journal of Agriculture and Environment for International Development (JAEID)

Typology of Cajanus cajan cultivation systems in Benin, West Africa

Ibidon Firmin Akpo; Filikibirou Tassou Zakari; Zachée Houessingbe; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Pigeon pea farms are heterogeneous, applying varied cropping systems. In this context, the study of the typology of farms taking into account the cropping systems they adopt is of practical importance for the implementation of targeted and effective technological interventions. The objective of this research is to identify and characterize the pigeon pea cropping systems practiced in Central Benin. A field survey was conducted among 240 pigeon pea producers randomly selected in the communes of Bantè, Glazoué and Ouèssè. Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Chi-square test of independence, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multinomial logit regression were used to analyze the collected data. Three types of cropping systems were identified. The first system, adopted by 31.25% of farmers, is characterized by pure stand cultivation, the use of herbicides and a reduced frequency of manual weeding. The second system, chosen by 47.08% of participants, is characterized by mixed cultivation with maize, legumes (soybean, peanut), or other crops (cassava, yam, market garden crops and sometimes in cashew plantations), without the use of herbicides but with a moderate frequency of manual weeding. The third system, adopted by 21.67% of farmers, is characterized by mixed cultivation with maize, the use of herbicides and a limited frequency of manual weeding. These systems have varying levels of economic performance and appear to be specific to each municipality. Factors such as available agricultural area, Mahi ethnicity, and location within the Glazoué and Ouèssè communes significantly influence the choice of these systems. The results advocate for promoting pure stand systems and improved varieties to optimize yields across all cultivation systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three pigeon pea cropping system types were identified.

Taxon
Cajanus cajanCajanus cajant0
Outcome
Three types of cropping systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three types of cropping systems were identified.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–746 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cajanus cajan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–25 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A pure stand system with herbicides and reduced manual weeding was used by 31.25% of farmers.

Taxon
Cajanus cajanCajanus cajant0
Outcome
pure stand cultivation, the use of herbicides and a reduced frequency of manual weedinge0
Value
31.25%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The first system, adopted by 31.25% of farmers, is characterized by pure stand cultivation, the use of herbicides and a reduced frequency of manual weeding.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–903 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cajanus cajan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–25 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed cultivation without herbicides and moderate manual weeding was used by 47.08% of participants.

Taxon
Cajanus cajanCajanus cajant0
Outcome
mixed cultivation with maize, legumes (soybean, peanut), or other crops (cassava, yam, market garden crops and sometimes in cashew plantations), without the use of herbicides but with a moderate frequency of manual weedinge0
Value
47.08%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The second system, chosen by 47.08% of participants, is characterized by mixed cultivation with maize, legumes (soybean, peanut), or other crops (cassava, yam, market garden crops and sometimes in cashew plantations), without the use of herbicides but with a moderate frequency of manual weeding.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1200 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cajanus cajan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–25 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed cultivation with maize, herbicides and limited manual weeding was used by 21.67% of farmers.

Taxon
Cajanus cajanCajanus cajant0
Outcome
mixed cultivation with maize, the use of herbicides and a limited frequency of manual weedinge0
Value
21.67%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The third system, adopted by 21.67% of farmers, is characterized by mixed cultivation with maize, the use of herbicides and a limited frequency of manual weeding.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1363 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cajanus cajan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–25 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cropping systems varied in economic performance and appeared municipality specific.

Taxon
Cajanus cajanCajanus cajant0
Outcome
varying levels of economic performance and appear to be specific to each municipalitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These systems have varying levels of economic performance and appear to be specific to each municipality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1364–1469 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cajanus cajan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–25 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Agricultural area, Mahi ethnicity and location significantly influenced system choice.

Taxon
Cajanus cajanCajanus cajant0
Outcome
choice of these systemse0
Qualifier
available agricultural area, Mahi ethnicitye0
Setting
Glazoué and Ouèssè communese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Factors such as available agricultural area, Mahi ethnicity, and location within the Glazoué and Ouèssè communes significantly influence the choice of these systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1470–1635 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cajanus cajan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–25 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors advocate pure stand systems and improved varieties to optimize yields.

Taxon
Cajanus cajanCajanus cajant0
Outcome
promoting pure stand systems and improved varieties to optimize yields across all cultivation systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results advocate for promoting pure stand systems and improved varieties to optimize yields across all cultivation systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1636–1763 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cajanus cajan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–25 · show in text ↑