Paper · 2026 · BMC Veterinary Research

Medicinal plants used to treat livestock diseases in Bure district, illubabor zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia

Abadir Abdu; Girma Gudesho

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Traditional medicine continues to serve as a primary source of healthcare for livestock in Ethiopia. However, ethnoveterinary practices are increasingly at risk due to cultural changes, habitat destruction, deforestation, and the overexploitation of medicinal plants. Documenting this traditional knowledge is essential for both drug discovery and the sustainable management of these resources. To address this, a cross-sectional study was conducted using semi-structured questionnaires by selecting 325 across five Kebeles to document the medicinal plants used in the treatment of livestock ailments in the Bure district. RESULT: A total of 33 plant species, belonging to 18 families that are used to treat 20 different livestock diseases were documented. The most frequently reported families were Asteraceae (18.2%), Solanaceae (12.1%), Fabaceae (9.1%), and Acanthaceae (6.1%). Shrubs accounted for the largest proportion of growth forms (42.4%), followed by herbs (30.3%). Leaves were the most commonly used plant part (57.7%), followed by fruits (11.4%). The majority of remedies were prepared from fresh plant materials (84.6%), with crushing being the predominant preparation method (35%). Oral administration was the most common route of application (67%). The highest informant consensus factor (ICF) was recorded for plants used to treat respiratory diseases (ICF = 0.97), followed by dermatological conditions (ICF = 0.88). CONCLUSION: The study area hosts a diverse array of medicinal plants, underscoring its importance as a valuable source of ethnoveterinary knowledge. Further research is essential to explore the phytochemical properties, antibacterial activities, modes of administration, and to establish standardized dosages for these medicinal plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A total of 33 medicinal plant species belonging to 18 families were documented.

Taxon
Medicinal plantst0
Outcome
plant speciese1
Value
33 plant speciese1
Qualifier
belonging to 18 familiese1
Setting
Bure districtt0

Verbatim

t0

“Medicinal plants used to treat livestock diseases in Bure district”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
e1

“A total of 33 plant species, belonging to 18 families that are used to treat 20 different livestock diseases were documented”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–767 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The documented plants were used to treat 20 different livestock diseases.

Taxon
Medicinal plantst0
Outcome
livestock diseasese1
Value
20 different livestock diseasese1
Setting
Bure districtt0

Verbatim

t0

“Medicinal plants used to treat livestock diseases in Bure district”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
e1

“A total of 33 plant species, belonging to 18 families that are used to treat 20 different livestock diseases were documented”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–767 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Asteraceae was the most frequently reported family, at 18.2%.

Taxon
AsteraceaeAsteraceaee2
Outcome
most frequently reported familiese2
Value
18.2%e2
Setting
Bure districtt0

Verbatim

t0

“Medicinal plants used to treat livestock diseases in Bure district”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
e2

“The most frequently reported families were Asteraceae (18.2%), Solanaceae (12.1%), Fabaceae (9.1%), and Acanthaceae (6.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–891 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Solanaceae was reported at 12.1% among the most frequently reported families.

Taxon
SolanaceaeSolanaceaee2
Outcome
most frequently reported familiese2
Value
12.1%e2
Setting
Bure districtt0

Verbatim

t0

“Medicinal plants used to treat livestock diseases in Bure district”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
e2

“The most frequently reported families were Asteraceae (18.2%), Solanaceae (12.1%), Fabaceae (9.1%), and Acanthaceae (6.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–891 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fabaceae was reported at 9.1% among the most frequently reported families.

Taxon
FabaceaeFabaceaee2
Outcome
most frequently reported familiese2
Value
9.1%e2
Setting
Bure districtt0

Verbatim

t0

“Medicinal plants used to treat livestock diseases in Bure district”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
e2

“The most frequently reported families were Asteraceae (18.2%), Solanaceae (12.1%), Fabaceae (9.1%), and Acanthaceae (6.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–891 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acanthaceae was reported at 6.1% among the most frequently reported families.

Taxon
AcanthaceaeAcanthaceaee2
Outcome
most frequently reported familiese2
Value
6.1%e2
Setting
Bure districtt0

Verbatim

t0

“Medicinal plants used to treat livestock diseases in Bure district”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
e2

“The most frequently reported families were Asteraceae (18.2%), Solanaceae (12.1%), Fabaceae (9.1%), and Acanthaceae (6.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–891 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shrubs were the largest proportion of growth forms, at 42.4%.

Taxon
Medicinal plantst0
Outcome
largest proportion of growth formse3
Direction
largeste3
Value
42.4%e3
Qualifier
Shrubse3
Setting
Bure districtt0

Verbatim

t0

“Medicinal plants used to treat livestock diseases in Bure district”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
e3

“Shrubs accounted for the largest proportion of growth forms (42.4%), followed by herbs (30.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–987 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbs were the second growth form, at 30.3%.

Taxon
Medicinal plantst0
Outcome
growth formse3
Value
30.3%e3
Qualifier
herbse3
Setting
Bure districtt0

Verbatim

t0

“Medicinal plants used to treat livestock diseases in Bure district”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
e3

“Shrubs accounted for the largest proportion of growth forms (42.4%), followed by herbs (30.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–987 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaves were the most commonly used plant part, at 57.7%.

Taxon
Medicinal plantst0
Organ / stage
Leavese4
Outcome
most commonly used plant parte4
Value
57.7%e4
Setting
Bure districtt0

Verbatim

t0

“Medicinal plants used to treat livestock diseases in Bure district”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
e4

“Leaves were the most commonly used plant part (57.7%), followed by fruits (11.4%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1070 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruits were the second most commonly used plant part, at 11.4%.

Taxon
Medicinal plantst0
Organ / stage
fruitse4
Outcome
most commonly used plant parte4
Value
11.4%e4
Setting
Bure districtt0

Verbatim

t0

“Medicinal plants used to treat livestock diseases in Bure district”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
e4

“Leaves were the most commonly used plant part (57.7%), followed by fruits (11.4%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1070 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The majority of remedies (84.6%) were prepared from fresh plant materials.

Taxon
Medicinal plantst0
Outcome
majority of remediese5
Value
84.6%e5
Qualifier
fresh plant materialse5
Setting
Bure districtt0

Verbatim

t0

“Medicinal plants used to treat livestock diseases in Bure district”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
e5

“The majority of remedies were prepared from fresh plant materials (84.6%), with crushing being the predominant preparation method (35%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1207 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crushing was the predominant preparation method, at 35%.

Taxon
Medicinal plantst0
Treatment
crushinge5
Outcome
predominant preparation methode5
Direction
predominante5
Value
35%e5
Setting
Bure districtt0

Verbatim

t0

“Medicinal plants used to treat livestock diseases in Bure district”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
e5

“The majority of remedies were prepared from fresh plant materials (84.6%), with crushing being the predominant preparation method (35%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1207 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oral administration was the most common route of application, at 67%.

Taxon
Medicinal plantst0
Treatment
Oral administratione6
Outcome
most common route of applicatione6
Value
67%e6
Setting
Bure districtt0

Verbatim

t0

“Medicinal plants used to treat livestock diseases in Bure district”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
e6

“Oral administration was the most common route of application (67%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1275 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants used for respiratory diseases had the highest informant consensus factor, ICF = 0.97.

Taxon
Medicinal plantst0
Outcome
informant consensus factor (ICF)e7
Direction
higheste7
Value
ICF = 0.97e7
Qualifier
respiratory diseasese7
Setting
Bure districtt0

Verbatim

t0

“Medicinal plants used to treat livestock diseases in Bure district”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
e7

“The highest informant consensus factor (ICF) was recorded for plants used to treat respiratory diseases (ICF = 0.97), followed by dermatological conditions (ICF = 0.88)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1445 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants used for dermatological conditions had an informant consensus factor of ICF = 0.88.

Taxon
Medicinal plantst0
Outcome
informant consensus factor (ICF)e7
Value
ICF = 0.88e7
Qualifier
dermatological conditionse7
Setting
Bure districtt0

Verbatim

t0

“Medicinal plants used to treat livestock diseases in Bure district”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
e7

“The highest informant consensus factor (ICF) was recorded for plants used to treat respiratory diseases (ICF = 0.97), followed by dermatological conditions (ICF = 0.88)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1445 · show in text ↑