Abstract
Unmanned Aerial Spraying Systems (UASS) has rapidly advanced precision crop protection. However, the spray performance of UASSs is influenced by nozzle atomization, rotor-induced airflow, and external environmental conditions. These factors cause strong spatiotemporal coupling and high uncertainty. As a result, visualization-based monitoring techniques are now essential for understanding these dynamics and supporting spray modeling and drift-mitigation design. This review highlights developments in spray visualization technologies along the “droplet–airflow–target” chain mechanism in UASS spraying. We first outline the physical fundamentals of droplet formation, liquid-sheet breakup, droplet size distribution, and transport mechanisms in rotor-induced flow. Dominant processes are identified across near-field, mid-field, and far-field scales. Next, we summarize major visualization methods. These include optical imaging (PDPA/PDIA, HSI, DIH), laser-based scattering and ranging (LD, LiDAR), and flow-field visualization (PIV). We compare their spatial resolution, measurement range, 3D reconstruction capabilities, and possible sources of error. We then review wind-tunnel trials, field experiments, and point-cloud reconstruction studies. These studies show how downwash flow and tip vortices affect plume structure, canopy disturbance, and deposition patterns. Finally, we discuss emerging intelligent analysis for large-scale monitoring—such as image-based droplet recognition, multimodal data fusion, and data-driven modeling. We outline future directions, including unified feature systems, vortex-coupled models, and embedded closed-loop spray control. This review is a comprehensive reference for advancing UASS analysis, drift assessment, spray optimization, and smart support systems.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 0
Judged adjacent: other boundary case — claims were not extracted. This is a scope decision by the model, not a statement about the paper’s findings.