Paper · 2026 · Agriculture

Genotype–Environment Interaction in Shaping the Agronomic Performance of Silage Maize Varieties Cultivated in Organic Farming Systems

Katarzyna Marcinkowska; Karolina Kolańska; Konrad Banaś; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Organic production systems impose strong environmental constraints on silage maize, yet the relative contributions of genotype, environment and their interaction (G × E) to key performance traits remain insufficiently resolved. This study evaluated six maize cultivars across 11 organically managed environments (location × year combinations) in Poland, assessing weed infestation, plant height, fresh matter yield, dry matter content and dry matter yield. Genotype × environment interaction was explicitly analyzed using AMMI-based models, and cultivar adaptability and stability were evaluated using complementary indices. Environmental effects consistently dominated all traits, explaining 78–91% of total variation, while G × E interactions, though smaller, were significant and altered cultivar rankings. Weed infestation ranged widely across environments, from below 10% to over 90%, and was almost entirely environment-driven. Yield-related traits followed a strong precipitation gradient, with Pawłowice and Śrem showing the highest biomass potential. SM Perseus produced the greatest dry matter yields (13.53 t·ha−1), whereas SM Mieszko combined high dry matter content (37.73%) with outstanding stability. Mega-environment analysis identified distinct adaptive niches, confirming that no genotype performed consistently best across all conditions. These findings close a key knowledge gap regarding cultivar performance under organic management and demonstrate the necessity of multi-environment evaluation that integrates performance, stability and adaptability analyses to support site-specific cultivar recommendations that enhance biomass productivity and silage quality in ecologically managed maize systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Environmental effects consistently dominated all traits of silage maize, explaining 78–91% of total variation.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
total variatione0
Value
78–91%e0
Qualifier
Environmental effectse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“Environmental effects consistently dominated all traits, explaining 78–91% of total variation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–718 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype × environment interactions were smaller than environmental effects but significant and altered cultivar rankings.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
altered cultivar rankingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“G × E interactions, though smaller, were significant and altered cultivar rankings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–808 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed infestation ranged widely across the organic environments, from below 10% to over 90%.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
Weed infestatione0
Value
from below 10% to over 90%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“Weed infestation ranged widely across environments, from below 10% to over 90%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–888 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed infestation was almost entirely environment-driven.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
Weed infestatione0
Qualifier
almost entirely environment-drivene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“Weed infestation ranged widely across environments, from below 10% to over 90%, and was almost entirely environment-driven”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–932 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield-related traits followed a strong precipitation gradient.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
precipitation gradiente0
Outcome
Yield-related traitse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“Yield-related traits followed a strong precipitation gradient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–995 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pawłowice and Śrem showed the highest biomass potential.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
biomass potentiale0
Direction
higheste0
Setting
Pawłowice and Śreme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“with Pawłowice and Śrem showing the highest biomass potential”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1058 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SM Perseus produced the greatest dry matter yields, 13.53 t·ha−1.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Material
SM Perseuse0
Outcome
dry matter yieldse0
Direction
greateste0
Value
13.53 t·ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“SM Perseus produced the greatest dry matter yields (13.53 t·ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SM Mieszko had high dry matter content, 37.73%.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Material
SM Mieszkoe0
Outcome
dry matter contente0
Direction
highe0
Value
37.73%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“SM Mieszko combined high dry matter content (37.73%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1187 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SM Mieszko showed outstanding stability.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Material
SM Mieszkoe0
Outcome
stabilitye0
Direction
outstandinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“SM Mieszko combined high dry matter content (37.73%) with outstanding stability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1214 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mega-environment analysis identified distinct adaptive niches.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
distinct adaptive nichese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“Mega-environment analysis identified distinct adaptive niches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1277 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No genotype performed consistently best across all conditions.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
no genotype performed consistently best across all conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“no genotype performed consistently best across all conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1356 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Multi-environment evaluation integrating performance, stability and adaptability analyses is necessary to support site-specific cultivar recommendations.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
multi-environment evaluatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“demonstrate the necessity of multi-environment evaluation that integrates performance, stability and adaptability analyses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1459–1581 · show in text ↑