Paper · 2026 · Plant Disease

First Report of Root-Knot Disease Caused by Meloidogyne hapla on Knoxia roxburghii in Yunnan, China

Yinghao Xian; Weisi Ma; Yinzhi Yang; et al.

14
claims
33
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Knoxia roxburghii (Spreng) M.A. Rau (“Hong Daji”), a perennial Rubiaceae herb and traditional Chinese medicine for cancers, carbuncles, and ascites, is widely distributed in southern China and Southeast Asia (Chen et al. 2022; Zhang et al. 2023). For the purpose of safeguarding the sustainable utilization of the wild resources, it is cultivated in Yunnan, Guangxi, and Guangdong of China. In April 2025, root-knot nematode disease was observed on K. roxburghii in Anning, Yunnan (24.9894° N, 102.4319° E), China. K. roxburghii plants infected with root knot nematodes formed root knots on both tap roots and fibrous roots, which could lead to root necrosis in severe cases. In addition, the mean weight of root knot on the tap roots accounted for 33.71 % of the total root weight per plant (n=20). Rhizosphere soil samples were collected at a depth of 15 cm, and second-stage juveniles (J2s) of nematodes were isolated using the Baermann funnel method as described by Cesarz et al. (2019). Nematode J2s density within soil samples was 24.25 ± 10.30 /100 g soil (n=3). Egg masses and females were isolated from diseased roots. J2s were obtained by incubating egg masses at 25 °C. Morphological analysis showed characteristics consistent with Meloidogyne hapla described by Whitehead (1968) and Wu (2023). For J2s (n=20), body length= 462.59 ± 48.19 μm, body width 23.04 ± 1.63 μm, tail length= 48.42 ± 8.77 μm, stylet length= 14.03 ± 1.18 μm, distance from dorsal esophageal gland opening to the stylet knot (DGO)= 3.90 ± 0.68 μm; for females (n=20), pear-shaped, body length= 574.55 ± 87.38 μm, maximum body width= 379.93 ± 62.06 μm, stylet length= 11.36 ± 1.46 μm, DGO= 3.02 ± 0.39 μm, stylet median bulb width (MBW)= 24.54 ± 6.09 μm, the perineum morphology is low dorsal arch round, with a typical inferior protrusion near the anus. Molecular identification was performed via amplifying 28S rDNA D2/D3 and ITS region by primers D2A/D3B (ACAAGTACCGTGAGGAAAGTTG/TCGGAAGGAACCAGCTACTA) and TW81/AB28 (GTTTCCGTAGGTGAACCTGC/ATATGCTTAAGTTCAGCGGGT), respectively (Subbotin et al. 2001; 2006). D2/D3 and ITS sequencing (GenBank accessions PV747744 and PV746187) revealed 99.78 - 100 % similarity to M. hapla sequences (OQ269680.1 and JX465560.1). Phylogenetic trees (MEGA11, neighbor-joining method) clustered the nemaode with M. hapla. Inoculation tests were performed in a greenhouse, with the average temperature maintained at 25 ℃ and natural, unshaded lighting. Approximately 1000 J2s per plant were inoculated onto 30 healthy potted K. roxburghii plants, while 30 potted control plants without nematodes. After 90 days, typical gall symptoms were observed on inoculated plants, whereas no symptoms were detected in the control group. Molecular reconfirmation confirmed M. hapla. The gall index (GI) was assessed using the number of galls rated on a 0 to 5 scale (Brito et al. 2020). The inoculated K. roxburghii plants had an average of GI 1.84 ± 0.94, eggs/g root 39.13 ± 17.27, egg masses/root 14.00 ± 5.62, and a reproduction factor (RF) 4.07 ± 1.64. To our knowledge, this is the first report of M. hapla infecting K. roxburghii in Yunnan, China. This study not only lays a scientific foundation for early disease warning, but also holds significant scientific significance and application value for ensuring the safe production of K. roxburghii.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root-knot disease was observed on K. roxburghii in Anning, Yunnan.

Taxon
Knoxia roxburghiiKnoxia roxburghiit0
Interactor
root-knot nematodeMeloidogynee0pathogen
Outcome
root-knot nematode diseasee0
Setting
Anning, Yunnane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Knoxia roxburghii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“root-knot nematode disease was observed on K. roxburghii in Anning, Yunnan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–480 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infected K. roxburghii formed root knots on tap and fibrous roots, with possible necrosis in severe cases.

Taxon
Knoxia roxburghiiKnoxia roxburghiit0
Interactor
root knot nematodesMeloidogynee0pathogen
Outcome
root knots on both tap roots and fibrous rootse0
Qualifier
root necrosis in severe casese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Knoxia roxburghii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“K. roxburghii plants infected with root knot nematodes formed root knots on both tap roots and fibrous roots, which could lead to root necrosis in severe cases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–674 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean tap-root knot weight was 33.71% of total root weight per plant.

Taxon
Knoxia roxburghiiKnoxia roxburghiit0
Interactor
root knote0pathogen
Outcome
mean weight of root knot on the tap rootse0
Value
33.71 %e0

Verbatim

t0

“Knoxia roxburghii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“the mean weight of root knot on the tap roots accounted for 33.71 % of the total root weight per plant (n=20)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–798 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil contained 24.25 ± 10.30 nematode juveniles per 100 g.

Taxon
Knoxia roxburghiiKnoxia roxburghiit0
Interactor
NematodeNematodae0pathogen
Outcome
Nematode J2s density within soil samplese0
Value
24.25 ± 10.30 /100 g soile0

Verbatim

t0

“Knoxia roxburghii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“Nematode J2s density within soil samples was 24.25 ± 10.30 /100 g soil (n=3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1068 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Morphology was consistent with Meloidogyne hapla.

Taxon
Meloidogyne haplaMeloidogyne haplae0
Outcome
characteristics consistent with Meloidogyne haplae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne hapla
Meloidogyne hapla · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryWalter Peraza Padilla, National University of Costa Rica, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Knoxia roxburghii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“Morphological analysis showed characteristics consistent with Meloidogyne hapla”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1260 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

D2/D3 and ITS sequences showed 99.78 - 100 % similarity to M. hapla sequences.

Taxon
M. haplaMeloidogyne haplae0
Outcome
similarity to M. hapla sequencese0
Value
99.78 - 100 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne hapla
Meloidogyne hapla · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryWalter Peraza Padilla, National University of Costa Rica, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Knoxia roxburghii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“D2/D3 and ITS sequencing (GenBank accessions PV747744 and PV746187) revealed 99.78 - 100 % similarity to M. hapla sequences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2090–2213 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phylogenetic trees clustered the nematode with M. hapla.

Taxon
M. haplaMeloidogyne haplae0
Outcome
clustered the nemaode with M. haplae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne hapla
Meloidogyne hapla · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryWalter Peraza Padilla, National University of Costa Rica, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Knoxia roxburghii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“Phylogenetic trees (MEGA11, neighbor-joining method) clustered the nemaode with M. hapla”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2243–2331 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematode inoculation produced galls after 90 days, while controls lacked symptoms.

Taxon
Knoxia roxburghiiKnoxia roxburghiit0
Treatment
Approximately 1000 J2s per plante1
Interactor
nematodesNematodae1pathogen
Outcome
typical gall symptomse0
Comparator
control groupe0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Knoxia roxburghii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“After 90 days, typical gall symptoms were observed on inoculated plants, whereas no symptoms were detected in the control group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2607–2734 · show in text ↑
e1

“Approximately 1000 J2s per plant were inoculated onto 30 healthy potted K. roxburghii plants, while 30 potted control plants without nematodes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2463–2605 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Molecular reconfirmation identified M. hapla after inoculation.

Taxon
M. haplaMeloidogyne haplae0
Outcome
Molecular reconfirmation confirmed M. haplae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne hapla
Meloidogyne hapla · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryWalter Peraza Padilla, National University of Costa Rica, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Knoxia roxburghii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“Molecular reconfirmation confirmed M. hapla”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2736–2779 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated plants had a mean gall index of 1.84 ± 0.94.

Taxon
Knoxia roxburghiiKnoxia roxburghiit0
Interactor
Meloidogyne haplaMeloidogyne haplat1pathogen
Outcome
GIe0
Value
1.84 ± 0.94e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne hapla
Meloidogyne hapla · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryWalter Peraza Padilla, National University of Costa Rica, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Knoxia roxburghii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“The inoculated K. roxburghii plants had an average of GI 1.84 ± 0.94”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2885–2953 · show in text ↑
t1

“Meloidogyne hapla”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated plants had 39.13 ± 17.27 eggs per gram of root.

Taxon
Knoxia roxburghiiKnoxia roxburghiit0
Interactor
Meloidogyne haplaMeloidogyne haplat1pathogen
Outcome
eggs/g roote0
Value
39.13 ± 17.27e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne hapla
Meloidogyne hapla · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryWalter Peraza Padilla, National University of Costa Rica, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Knoxia roxburghii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“eggs/g root 39.13 ± 17.27”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2955–2980 · show in text ↑
t1

“Meloidogyne hapla”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated plants had 14.00 ± 5.62 egg masses per root.

Taxon
Knoxia roxburghiiKnoxia roxburghiit0
Interactor
Meloidogyne haplaMeloidogyne haplat1pathogen
Outcome
egg masses/roote0
Value
14.00 ± 5.62e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne hapla
Meloidogyne hapla · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryWalter Peraza Padilla, National University of Costa Rica, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Knoxia roxburghii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“egg masses/root 14.00 ± 5.62”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2982–3010 · show in text ↑
t1

“Meloidogyne hapla”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The reproduction factor was 4.07 ± 1.64.

Taxon
Meloidogyne haplaMeloidogyne haplat1
Outcome
reproduction factor (RF)e0
Value
4.07 ± 1.64e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne hapla
Meloidogyne hapla · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryWalter Peraza Padilla, National University of Costa Rica, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Knoxia roxburghii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“a reproduction factor (RF) 4.07 ± 1.64”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3016–3054 · show in text ↑
t1

“Meloidogyne hapla”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–61 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors report the first M. hapla infection of K. roxburghii in Yunnan, China.

Taxon
Knoxia roxburghiiKnoxia roxburghiit0
Interactor
M. haplaMeloidogyne haplae0pathogen
Outcome
first report of M. hapla infecting K. roxburghiie0
Setting
Yunnan, Chinae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne hapla
Meloidogyne hapla · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryWalter Peraza Padilla, National University of Costa Rica, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Knoxia roxburghii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“this is the first report of M. hapla infecting K. roxburghii in Yunnan, China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3074–3151 · show in text ↑