Paper · 2026 · EFSA Journal

Commodity risk assessment of Vitis spp. plants from Moldova

EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH); Antonio Vicent Civera; Paula Baptista; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nd

Abstract

Abstract The European Commission requests EFSA to provide scientific opinions in the field of plant health in accordance with Article 29 of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002. Annex VI of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072 lists plants, plant products and other objects whose introduction into the Union from certain third countries is prohibited. This Scientific Opinion covers plant health risks posed by 1‐ to 2‐year‐old grafted bare root plants without leaves of Vitis spp. from the Republic of Moldova, taking into account the available scientific information, including the technical information provided by Moldova. All pests associated with the commodity were evaluated for their relevance for this opinion. Eight pests (one EU quarantine pest and seven Vitis spp. RNQPs) that fulfilled all the criteria were selected for further evaluation. For the selected pests, the risk mitigation measures implemented in Moldova and described in the technical dossier were evaluated. For the selected pests, an expert judgement is given on the likelihood of pest freedom considering the risk mitigation measures acting on the pest, including uncertainties associated with the assessment. The degree of pest freedom varies among the pests evaluated, with grapevine fleck virus (GFkV, Maculavirus vitis) and ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma solani’ being the pests most frequently expected on the imported plants. The Expert Knowledge Elicitation indicated with 95% certainty that 9900 or more units per 10,000 will be free from the above‐mentioned pests.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pest freedom varied among the evaluated pests.

Taxon
Vitis spp.Vitist0
Outcome
degree of pest freedome0
Direction
variese0
Setting
Moldovat0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vitis spp. plants from Moldova”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“The degree of pest freedom varies among the pests evaluated, with grapevine fleck virus (GFkV, Maculavirus vitis) and ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma solani’ being the pests most frequently expected on the imported plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1407 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grapevine fleck virus was among the pests most frequently expected on imported Vitis plants.

Taxon
Vitis spp.Vitist0
Interactor
grapevine fleck virus (GFkV, Maculavirus vitis)Grapevine fleck viruse0pathogen
Outcome
grapevine fleck virus (GFkV, Maculavirus vitis)e0
Setting
Moldovat0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vitis spp. plants from Moldova”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“The degree of pest freedom varies among the pests evaluated, with grapevine fleck virus (GFkV, Maculavirus vitis) and ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma solani’ being the pests most frequently expected on the imported plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1407 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Candidatus Phytoplasma solani was among the pests most frequently expected on imported Vitis plants.

Taxon
Vitis spp.Vitist0
Interactor
‘Candidatus Phytoplasma solani’Candidatus Phytoplasma solanie0pathogen
Outcome
‘Candidatus Phytoplasma solani’e0
Setting
Moldovat0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Candidatus Phytoplasma solani
Candidatus Phytoplasma solani · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vitis spp. plants from Moldova”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“The degree of pest freedom varies among the pests evaluated, with grapevine fleck virus (GFkV, Maculavirus vitis) and ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma solani’ being the pests most frequently expected on the imported plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1407 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Expert elicitation estimated with 95% certainty that at least 9900 of 10,000 units would be free of the named pests.

Taxon
Vitis spp.Vitist0
Outcome
free from the above‐mentioned pestse0
Value
9900 or more units per 10,000e0
Qualifier
95% certaintye0
Setting
Moldovat0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vitis spp. plants from Moldova”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“The Expert Knowledge Elicitation indicated with 95% certainty that 9900 or more units per 10,000 will be free from the above‐mentioned pests.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1549 · show in text ↑