Abstract
The CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing system has been established in many crops. The advantages of its directional creation of mutants are increasingly favored by researchers. However, the CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing technology targets the editing of the target gene and also triggers off-target effects at different frequencies, which determine the reliability of the genome editing system. This study was based on the previous CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing system established in the island-cotton somatic cells. Edit the vector by constructing different codon optimization methods for Cas9, different numbers of PAM sites and different target sites, and the difference in editing efficiency and off-target effect were analyzed and compared. There was no significant difference in editing effects and off-target effects caused by Cas9-edited vectors with different optimal codons. The partially double-sgRNA had significantly higher editing efficiency and significantly lower off-target efficiency than the single sgRNA; the editing efficiency of the transformed No shift sgRNA target sequence was significantly higher than that of the Shift sgRNA and the former had a significant decrease in off-target efficiency relative to the latter. Therefore, using No shift sgRNA type target sequence can effectively improve the editing efficiency and significantly reduce the off-target efficiency, thus laying a theoretical foundation for optimizing the CRISPR/Cas9 mediated island cotton genome editing system and accurately and efficiently creating island cotton functional gene mutants in the future.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Different Cas9 codon optimization methods did not significantly change editing effects.
- Taxon
- Gossypium barbadense L.
.jpg?width=60)
Gossypium barbadenset0 - Treatment
- different optimal codonse0
- Outcome
- editing effectse0
- Direction
- no significant differencee0
- Comparator
- Cas9-edited vectorse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“There was no significant difference in editing effects and off-target effects caused by Cas9-edited vectors with different optimal codons.”
t0“Gossypium barbadense L.”
Claim · model-written summary
Different Cas9 codon optimization methods did not significantly change off-target effects.
- Taxon
- Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadenset0
- Treatment
- different optimal codonse0
- Outcome
- off-target effectse0
- Direction
- no significant differencee0
- Comparator
- Cas9-edited vectorse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There was no significant difference in editing effects and off-target effects caused by Cas9-edited vectors with different optimal codons.”
t0“Gossypium barbadense L.”
Claim · model-written summary
Partially double-sgRNA significantly increased editing efficiency relative to single sgRNA.
- Taxon
- Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadenset0
- Treatment
- partially double-sgRNAe0
- Outcome
- editing efficiencye0
- Direction
- significantly highere0
- Comparator
- single sgRNAe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The partially double-sgRNA had significantly higher editing efficiency and significantly lower off-target efficiency than the single sgRNA; the editing efficiency of the transformed No shift sgRNA target sequence was significantly higher than that of the Shift sgRNA and the former had a significant decrease in off-target efficiency relative to the latter.”
t0“Gossypium barbadense L.”
Claim · model-written summary
Partially double-sgRNA significantly lowered off-target efficiency relative to single sgRNA.
- Taxon
- Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadenset0
- Treatment
- partially double-sgRNAe0
- Outcome
- off-target efficiencye0
- Direction
- significantly lowere0
- Comparator
- single sgRNAe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The partially double-sgRNA had significantly higher editing efficiency and significantly lower off-target efficiency than the single sgRNA; the editing efficiency of the transformed No shift sgRNA target sequence was significantly higher than that of the Shift sgRNA and the former had a significant decrease in off-target efficiency relative to the latter.”
t0“Gossypium barbadense L.”
Claim · model-written summary
No shift sgRNA significantly increased editing efficiency relative to Shift sgRNA.
- Taxon
- Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadenset0
- Treatment
- No shift sgRNAe0
- Outcome
- editing efficiencye0
- Direction
- significantly highere0
- Comparator
- Shift sgRNAe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The partially double-sgRNA had significantly higher editing efficiency and significantly lower off-target efficiency than the single sgRNA; the editing efficiency of the transformed No shift sgRNA target sequence was significantly higher than that of the Shift sgRNA and the former had a significant decrease in off-target efficiency relative to the latter.”
t0“Gossypium barbadense L.”
Claim · model-written summary
No shift sgRNA significantly decreased off-target efficiency relative to Shift sgRNA.
- Taxon
- Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadenset0
- Treatment
- No shift sgRNAe0
- Outcome
- off-target efficiencye0
- Direction
- significant decreasee0
- Comparator
- Shift sgRNAe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The partially double-sgRNA had significantly higher editing efficiency and significantly lower off-target efficiency than the single sgRNA; the editing efficiency of the transformed No shift sgRNA target sequence was significantly higher than that of the Shift sgRNA and the former had a significant decrease in off-target efficiency relative to the latter.”
t0“Gossypium barbadense L.”