Paper · 2026 · Journal of Applied Life Sciences International

Floristic Diversity and Ecological Characterization of the Habitat of Crocodylus suchus in the Niger River in the Niamey Region

Ibrahim MADOUGOU; MOUSSA Soulé; Issa ALHOU AMOUDE; et al.

16
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Sustainable management of freshwater reptiles in West Africa Sahel is affected by great data scarcity, regional data gaps mostly about the crocodile’s species like Crocodylus suchus. Thus, this study addresses these gaps by determining the floristic diversity and characterizing the habitat of Crocodylus suchus in the Niger River in the Niamey region. We used a systematic random sampling for the floristic inventory using the Brun-Blanquet method. We recorded 58 plant species belong 22 families and 43 genera with a predominance of Eichhornia crassipes (12.32%) and Echinochloa stagnina (12.42%) which varies significantly across the area (P < 0.05). The others have a frequency of 5% or less. Approximately 40 species have a low frequency, with a percentage less than 1%. The macrophytes are 58.54% dicotyledons and 41.46% monocotyledons. The most represented families are Poaceae (29.76%), Convolvulaceae (16.10%), followed by Pontederaceae and Cucurbitaceae at 13.41% and 12.93%, respectively. Ecosystem classification based on species richness revealed two distinct groups of habitats, with similarities between the islands and the right bank. The results also showed that the observation frequency and cumulative mean cover of species vary very significantly across the area (P< 2.2e-16). Dominant species such as Echinochloa stagnina, Mimosa pigra and Eichhornia crassipes have high cover at 1.95%, 1.86%, and 1.33%, respectively. The dominant families are represented by stable and prolific species, with an abundance of prolific species in the Convolvulaceae family. This study has characterized the floristic diversity of the crocodile habitat, highlighting the dominant species and plant communities present. Further research would be useful to better understand the environmental factors and ecological processes that influence the floristic composition and structure of plant communities in this habitat. Management and conservation strategies could be developed to maintain biological diversity and prevent negative impacts on the ecosystem, taking these results into account.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The habitat contained 58 plant species in 22 families and 43 genera.

Taxon
plant speciese0
Outcome
plant speciese0
Value
58 plant speciese0

Verbatim

e0

“We recorded 58 plant species belong 22 families and 43 genera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–511 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eichhornia crassipes accounted for 12.32% of occurrences.

Taxon
Eichhornia crassipese0
Outcome
Eichhornia crassipese0
Value
12.32%e0
Setting
the areae0

Verbatim

e0

“Eichhornia crassipes (12.32%) and Echinochloa stagnina (12.42%) which varies significantly across the area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–641 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Echinochloa stagnina accounted for 12.42% of occurrences.

Taxon
Echinochloa stagninaEchinochloa stagninae0
Outcome
Echinochloa stagninae0
Value
12.42%e0
Setting
the areae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Echinochloa stagnina
Echinochloa stagnina · TaxonJose Hernandez @ USDA-NRCS PLANTS Database · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eichhornia crassipes (12.32%) and Echinochloa stagnina (12.42%) which varies significantly across the area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–641 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Approximately 40 species had frequency below 1%.

Taxon
speciese0
Outcome
low frequencye0
Value
less than 1%e0
Qualifier
Approximately 40 speciese0

Verbatim

e0

“Approximately 40 species have a low frequency, with a percentage less than 1%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–775 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Macrophytes comprised 58.54% dicotyledons.

Taxon
macrophytese0
Outcome
dicotyledonse0
Value
58.54%e0

Verbatim

e0

“The macrophytes are 58.54% dicotyledons and 41.46% monocotyledons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–842 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Macrophytes comprised 41.46% monocotyledons.

Taxon
macrophytese0
Outcome
monocotyledonse0
Value
41.46%e0

Verbatim

e0

“The macrophytes are 58.54% dicotyledons and 41.46% monocotyledons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–842 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poaceae represented 29.76% of families.

Taxon
PoaceaePoaceaee0
Outcome
Poaceaee0
Value
29.76%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Poaceae (29.76%), Convolvulaceae (16.10%), followed by Pontederaceae and Cucurbitaceae at 13.41% and 12.93%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–984 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Convolvulaceae represented 16.10%.

Taxon
ConvolvulaceaeConvolvulaceaee0
Outcome
Convolvulaceaee0
Value
16.10%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Poaceae (29.76%), Convolvulaceae (16.10%), followed by Pontederaceae and Cucurbitaceae at 13.41% and 12.93%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–984 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pontederaceae represented 13.41%.

Taxon
Pontederaceaee0
Outcome
Pontederaceaee0
Value
13.41%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Pontederaceae and Cucurbitaceae at 13.41% and 12.93%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–998 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cucurbitaceae represented 12.93%.

Taxon
CucurbitaceaeCucurbitaceaee0
Outcome
Cucurbitaceaee0
Value
12.93%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Pontederaceae and Cucurbitaceae at 13.41% and 12.93%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–998 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Species richness separated habitat into two groups, with island and right-bank similarity.

Taxon
speciese0
Outcome
two distinct groups of habitatse0
Setting
the islands and the right banke0

Verbatim

e0

“Ecosystem classification based on species richness revealed two distinct groups of habitats, with similarities between the islands and the right bank.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1150 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Species observation frequency and cover varied across the area.

Taxon
speciese0
Outcome
observation frequency and cumulative mean covere0
Direction
varye0
Setting
the areae0

Verbatim

e0

“observation frequency and cumulative mean cover of species vary very significantly across the area (P< 2.2e-16)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1295 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Echinochloa stagnina had 1.95% cover.

Taxon
Echinochloa stagninaEchinochloa stagninae0
Outcome
covere0
Direction
highe0
Value
1.95%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Echinochloa stagnina
Echinochloa stagnina · TaxonJose Hernandez @ USDA-NRCS PLANTS Database · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Echinochloa stagnina, Mimosa pigra and Eichhornia crassipes have high cover at 1.95%, 1.86%, and 1.33%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1438 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mimosa pigra had 1.86% cover.

Taxon
Mimosa pigraMimosa pigrae0
Outcome
covere0
Direction
highe0
Value
1.86%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mimosa pigra
Mimosa pigra · TaxonWibowo Djatmiko ( Wie146 ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Echinochloa stagnina, Mimosa pigra and Eichhornia crassipes have high cover at 1.95%, 1.86%, and 1.33%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1438 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eichhornia crassipes had 1.33% cover.

Taxon
Eichhornia crassipese0
Outcome
covere0
Direction
highe0
Value
1.33%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Echinochloa stagnina, Mimosa pigra and Eichhornia crassipes have high cover at 1.95%, 1.86%, and 1.33%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1438 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prolific species were abundant in Convolvulaceae.

Taxon
ConvolvulaceaeConvolvulaceaee0
Outcome
abundance of prolific speciese0

Verbatim

e0

“an abundance of prolific species in the Convolvulaceae family”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1515–1576 · show in text ↑