Paper · 2012 · LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)

Mangueiras 'Tommy Atkins' submetidas à alta densidade de plantio em condições de clima tropical subúmido no Nordeste do Brasil.

SOUSA, C. A. F. de; CAVALCANTI, M. I. L. G.; VASCONCELOS, L. F. L.; et al.

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

The objective of this work was to evaluate the effects of high density planting on 'Tommy Atkins' mango trees cultivated in subhumid warm tropical climate in northeastern Brazil. Treatments consisted of five spacial arrangements of plants (8x5 m, 7x4 m, 6x3 m, 5x2 m and 4x2 m), which resulted in the following plant densities: 250 (control), 357, 555, 1,000 and 1,250 plants per hectare. Plant vegetative and reproductive variables, besides fruit quality parameters, were evaluated at seven and eight years after transplantation to the field. In general, high density planting caused reduction in vegetative and reproductive variables of individual mango trees, but had little influence on fruit quality. Above 555 plants per hectare, a significant decrease was observed in mango tree growth. Furthermore, there were decreases in the percentage of flowering, fruit yield per plant and per area. However, planting density up to 357 plants per hectare, in spite of decreasing plant growth and fruit yield per tree, increases fruit yield per area in 30% in comparison to the control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-density planting reduced vegetative and reproductive variables of individual mango trees.

Material
Tommy Atkinse1
Treatment
high density plantinge2
Outcome
vegetative and reproductive variablese2
Direction
reductione2
Setting
subhumid warm tropical climate in northeastern Brazile1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“effects of high density planting on 'Tommy Atkins' mango trees cultivated in subhumid warm tropical climate in northeastern Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–177 · show in text ↑
e2

“In general, high density planting caused reduction in vegetative and reproductive variables of individual mango trees, but had little influence on fruit quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–704 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Above 555 plants per hectare, mango tree growth decreased significantly.

Material
Tommy Atkinse1
Treatment
Above 555 plants per hectaree3
Outcome
mango tree growthe3
Direction
decreasee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“effects of high density planting on 'Tommy Atkins' mango trees cultivated in subhumid warm tropical climate in northeastern Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–177 · show in text ↑
e3

“Above 555 plants per hectare, a significant decrease was observed in mango tree growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–792 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Above 555 plants per hectare, the percentage of flowering, fruit yield per plant and fruit yield per area decreased.

Material
Tommy Atkinse1
Treatment
Above 555 plants per hectaree3
Outcome
percentage of flowering, fruit yield per plant and per areae4
Direction
decreasese4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“effects of high density planting on 'Tommy Atkins' mango trees cultivated in subhumid warm tropical climate in northeastern Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–177 · show in text ↑
e3

“Above 555 plants per hectare, a significant decrease was observed in mango tree growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–792 · show in text ↑
e4

“Furthermore, there were decreases in the percentage of flowering, fruit yield per plant and per area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting density up to 357 plants per hectare decreased plant growth and fruit yield per tree.

Material
Tommy Atkinse1
Treatment
planting density up to 357 plants per hectaree5
Outcome
plant growth and fruit yield per treee5
Direction
decreasinge5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“effects of high density planting on 'Tommy Atkins' mango trees cultivated in subhumid warm tropical climate in northeastern Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–177 · show in text ↑
e5

“planting density up to 357 plants per hectare, in spite of decreasing plant growth and fruit yield per tree, increases fruit yield per area in 30% in comparison to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1080 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting density up to 357 plants per hectare increased fruit yield per area by 30% compared with the control.

Material
Tommy Atkinse1
Treatment
planting density up to 357 plants per hectaree5
Outcome
fruit yield per areae5
Direction
increasese5
Value
30%e5
Comparator
controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“effects of high density planting on 'Tommy Atkins' mango trees cultivated in subhumid warm tropical climate in northeastern Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–177 · show in text ↑
e5

“planting density up to 357 plants per hectare, in spite of decreasing plant growth and fruit yield per tree, increases fruit yield per area in 30% in comparison to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1080 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-density planting had little influence on mango fruit quality.

Material
Tommy Atkinse1
Treatment
high density plantinge2
Outcome
fruit qualitye2
Direction
little influencee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“effects of high density planting on 'Tommy Atkins' mango trees cultivated in subhumid warm tropical climate in northeastern Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–177 · show in text ↑
e2

“In general, high density planting caused reduction in vegetative and reproductive variables of individual mango trees, but had little influence on fruit quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–704 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.