Paper · 2026 · PeerJ

The Appalbees menu: a multiyear, multilocus metagenetic assessment of pollen foraging by Appalachian Bombus affinis workers

Robert S. Cornman; Mark J. Hepner; Clint R.V. Otto

6
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Background Detailed studies of foraging behavior are needed for scientific management of the endangered rusty-patched bumblebee ( Bombus affinis ) in the disjunct and ecologically differentiated habitats it presently occupies. Current knowledge gaps hinder recovery planning but are challenging to redress through direct observation of rare interactions in the field. Methods We used genetic metabarcoding to characterize the taxonomic composition of pollen collected by B. affinis workers in the Appalachian mountains of Virginia and West Virginia from 2021–2023. We developed a custom sequence database of the regional flora and compared results for two independent genetic loci, internal transcribed spacer 1 and internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS1 and ITS2). Results While ITS2 consistently detected more plant diversity, results from the two loci were broadly concordant with a few notable exceptions. The plant genera Hydrangea , Actaea , Rhododendron , Tilia , and (unexpectedly) Laportea were prominent in midsummer samples, with Rubus a consistent contributor in late spring and early summer. Pea flowers (family Fabaceae) were relatively infrequent but the genera Securigera and Trifolium were detected before the Hydrangea bloom and again in late summer afterwards. The diversity of forage plants was highest in late summer, driven primarily by various genera of Asteraceae. Comparing the current data with previous work indicates regional differentiation in forage plants between Appalachia and the upper Midwest, but also allows ‘consensus’ forage sources that are supported by multiple lines of evidence and shared between regions to be tabulated. These results should help managers focus survey efforts for this endangered species and plan habitat enhancements.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrangea, Actaea, Rhododendron, Tilia and Laportea were prominent in midsummer pollen samples

Taxon
HydrangeaHydrangeae1
Interactor
B. affinisBombus affinise2pollinator
Outcome
prominente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hydrangea
Hydrangea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alvesgaspar · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bombus affinis
Bombus affinis · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bombus affinis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–115 · show in text ↑
e2

“pollen collected by B. affinis workers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–489 · show in text ↑
e1

“The plant genera Hydrangea , Actaea , Rhododendron , Tilia , and (unexpectedly) Laportea were prominent in midsummer samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1031 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rubus was a consistent forage contributor in late spring and early summer

Taxon
RubusRubuse3
Interactor
B. affinisBombus affinise2pollinator
Outcome
consistent contributore3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus
Rubus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)George Chernilevsky · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bombus affinis
Bombus affinis · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bombus affinis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–115 · show in text ↑
e2

“pollen collected by B. affinis workers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–489 · show in text ↑
e3

“with Rubus a consistent contributor in late spring and early summer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1100 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Securigera and Trifolium were detected before the Hydrangea bloom and again in late summer

Taxon
Securigera and TrifoliumTrifoliumSecurigerae4
Interactor
B. affinisBombus affinise2pollinator
Outcome
were detectede4
Qualifier
before the Hydrangea bloom and again in late summer afterwardse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium
Trifolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)AnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Securigera
Securigera · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)C T Johansson · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bombus affinis
Bombus affinis · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bombus affinis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–115 · show in text ↑
e2

“pollen collected by B. affinis workers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–489 · show in text ↑
e4

“the genera Securigera and Trifolium were detected before the Hydrangea bloom and again in late summer afterwards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1275 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ITS2 detected more plant diversity than ITS1 in pollen metabarcoding

Taxon
plante5
Outcome
plant diversitye5
Direction
moree5
Comparator
ITS1e6

Verbatim

t0

“Bombus affinis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–115 · show in text ↑
e5

“While ITS2 consistently detected more plant diversity, results from the two loci were broadly concordant with a few notable exceptions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–905 · show in text ↑
e6

“internal transcribed spacer 1 and internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS1 and ITS2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–761 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forage plant diversity was highest in late summer, driven by Asteraceae

Taxon
AsteraceaeAsteraceaee7
Interactor
B. affinisBombus affinise2pollinator
Outcome
diversity of forage plantse7
Setting
late summere7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bombus affinis
Bombus affinis · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bombus affinis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–115 · show in text ↑
e2

“pollen collected by B. affinis workers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–489 · show in text ↑
e7

“The diversity of forage plants was highest in late summer, driven primarily by various genera of Asteraceae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1384 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forage plants differ regionally between Appalachia and the upper Midwest

Taxon
forage plantse1
Outcome
regional differentiatione1
Setting
Appalachia and the upper Midweste1

Verbatim

t0

“Bombus affinis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–115 · show in text ↑
e1

“Comparing the current data with previous work indicates regional differentiation in forage plants between Appalachia and the upper Midwest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1386–1524 · show in text ↑