Paper · 2026 · Agriculture

Rice Yield Prediction Model at Pixel Level Using Machine Learning and Multi-Temporal Sentinel-2 Data in Valencia, Spain

Rubén Simeón; Alba Agenjos-Moreno; Constanza Rubio; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Rice yield prediction at high spatial resolution is essential to support precision management and sustainable intensification in irrigated systems. While many remote sensing studies provide yield estimates at the field scale, pixel-level predictions are required to characterize within-field variability. This study assesses the potential of multitemporal Sentinel-2 imagery and machine learning to estimate rice yield at pixel level in the Albufera rice area (Valencia, Spain). Yield data from combine harvester maps were collected for ‘JSendra’ and ‘Bomba’ Japonica varieties over five growing seasons (2020–2024) and linked to 10 m Sentinel-2 bands in the visible, near-infrared (NIR) and short-wave infrared (SWIR) regions. Random Forest (RF) and XGBoost (XGB) models were trained with 2020–2023 data and independently validated in 2024. XGB systematically outperformed RF, achieving at 110 and 130 DAS (days after showing), R2 values of 0.74 and 0.85 and RMSE values of 0.63 and 0.28 t·ha−1 for ‘JSendra’ and ‘Bomba’. Prediction accuracy increased as the season progressed, and models using all spectral bands clearly outperformed configurations based only on spectral indices, confirming the dominant contribution of NIR reflectance. Spatial error analysis revealed errors at field edges and headlands, while central pixels were more accurately predicted. Overall, the proposed approach provides accurate, spatially explicit rice yield maps that capture within-field variability and support both end-of-season yield estimation and early season forecasting, enabling the identification of potentially low-yield zones to support targeted management decisions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

XGBoost outperformed Random Forest for rice yield prediction.

Outcome
outperformede0
Direction
outperformede0
Comparator
RFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“XGB systematically outperformed RF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–876 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Yield Prediction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–21 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For JSendra, XGBoost achieved R2 of 0.74 at 110 DAS.

Material
JSendrae0
Outcome
R2 valuese0
Value
0.74e0
Qualifier
110e0
Comparator
RFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“XGB systematically outperformed RF, achieving at 110 and 130 DAS (days after showing), R2 values of 0.74 and 0.85 and RMSE values of 0.63 and 0.28 t·ha−1 for ‘JSendra’ and ‘Bomba’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–1021 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Yield Prediction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–21 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For Bomba, XGBoost achieved R2 of 0.85 at 130 DAS.

Material
Bombae0
Outcome
R2 valuese0
Value
0.85e0
Qualifier
130e0
Comparator
RFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“XGB systematically outperformed RF, achieving at 110 and 130 DAS (days after showing), R2 values of 0.74 and 0.85 and RMSE values of 0.63 and 0.28 t·ha−1 for ‘JSendra’ and ‘Bomba’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–1021 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Yield Prediction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–21 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For JSendra, XGBoost RMSE was 0.63 t·ha−1.

Material
JSendrae0
Outcome
RMSEe0
Value
0.63e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RMSE values of 0.63 and 0.28 t·ha−1 for ‘JSendra’ and ‘Bomba’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1021 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Yield Prediction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–21 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For Bomba, XGBoost RMSE was 0.28 t·ha−1.

Material
Bombae0
Outcome
RMSEe0
Value
0.28 t·ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RMSE values of 0.63 and 0.28 t·ha−1 for ‘JSendra’ and ‘Bomba’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1021 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Yield Prediction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–21 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prediction accuracy increased as the season progressed.

Outcome
Prediction accuracye0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
the season progressede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Prediction accuracy increased as the season progressed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1077 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Yield Prediction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–21 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Models using all spectral bands outperformed spectral-index configurations.

Outcome
outperformede0
Direction
outperformede0
Comparator
configurations based only on spectral indicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“models using all spectral bands clearly outperformed configurations based only on spectral indices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1181 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Yield Prediction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–21 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NIR reflectance made the dominant contribution to model prediction.

Outcome
dominant contribution of NIR reflectancee0
Value
NIR reflectancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“confirming the dominant contribution of NIR reflectance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1238 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Yield Prediction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–21 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prediction errors occurred at field edges and headlands.

Outcome
errors at field edges and headlandse0
Value
field edges and headlandse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spatial error analysis revealed errors at field edges and headlands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1307 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Yield Prediction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–21 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Central pixels were predicted more accurately.

Outcome
accurately predictede0
Direction
more accuratelye0
Comparator
central pixelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“central pixels were more accurately predicted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1360 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Yield Prediction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–21 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The approach generated spatial rice yield maps capturing within-field variability.

Outcome
spatially explicit rice yield mapse0
Value
within-field variabilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the proposed approach provides accurate, spatially explicit rice yield maps that capture within-field variability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1484 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Yield Prediction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–21 · show in text ↑