Paper · 2026 · Plants

Chitosan Acts as a Sustainable Strategy for Integrated Management of Root-Knot Nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) in Cherry Tomato

Carolina González-Cardona; Juan Camilo Orrego-Cardona; Alejandro Ospina-Gutiérrez; et al.

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

spp., RKN) penetrate the roots of plants, blocking the flow of water and nutrients, preventing plant development, and causing losses of up to 68% in production. Its management is limited by the low availability of genetically resistant materials, the inefficient use of biological controllers, and the high risk of environmental contamination from the application of pesticides. The aim of this study was to contribute to the integrated management of (RKN) through the use of chitosan. A completely randomized experimental design was used in a factorial arrangement with two applications (foliar or edaphic), two cherry tomato genotypes (IAC1687 and LA2076), and eight treatments (three concentrations of chitosan (1.5-2.0-2.5 mg/mL), commercial controls and absolute controls). The yield and nematode population components were evaluated. The cherry tomato (IAC1687) obtained the greatest yield, with 33.517.1 kg/ha and an 85% reduction in the nematode population with the application of 2.5 mg/mL of chitosan to the soil. Chitosan improved the yield components of the evaluated cultivars and reduced nematode populations, suggesting that it can be a sustainable alternative in commercial production systems, as it can help reduce the use of chemical pesticides and improve health and crop productivity. As a limitation of this study, the use of acetic acid as a solvent for chitosan potentially interfered with the results associated with the nematode population, increasing bias and imprecision as there was no blockage due to light, temperature, or irrigation. Therefore, we suggest that future research explores alternative solvents to elucidate the mechanism of action or response of chitosan.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cherry tomato genotype IAC1687 obtained the greatest yield, 33.517.1 kg/ha.

Material
IAC1687e1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
greateste1
Value
33.517.1 kg/hae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The cherry tomato (IAC1687) obtained the greatest yield, with 33.517.1 kg/ha and an 85% reduction in the nematode population with the application of 2.5 mg/mL of chitosan to the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–1022 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 2.5 mg/mL chitosan to the soil reduced the nematode population by 85% in cherry tomato.

Treatment
application of 2.5 mg/mL of chitosan to the soile1
Interactor
Meloidogyne spp.Meloidogynet0pest
Outcome
nematode populatione1
Direction
reductione1
Value
85%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The cherry tomato (IAC1687) obtained the greatest yield, with 33.517.1 kg/ha and an 85% reduction in the nematode population with the application of 2.5 mg/mL of chitosan to the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–1022 · show in text ↑
t0

“Root-Knot Nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) in Cherry Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan improved the yield components of the evaluated cherry tomato cultivars.

Treatment
Chitosane2
Outcome
yield componentse2
Direction
improvede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Root-Knot Nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) in Cherry Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–124 · show in text ↑
e2

“Chitosan improved the yield components of the evaluated cultivars and reduced nematode populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1122 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan can be a sustainable alternative in commercial cherry tomato production systems.

Outcome
sustainable alternative in commercial production systemse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Root-Knot Nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) in Cherry Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–124 · show in text ↑
e3

“suggesting that it can be a sustainable alternative in commercial production systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1208 · show in text ↑

chitosan · Meloidogyne · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

chitosan · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

29 papers: 29 positive, 0 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.