Paper · 2026 · World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews

Study of spore dynamics in the rhizosphere of millet over time

HAROUNA MAIDOUKIA Abdoul Razack; JAMILOU SALISSOU Ibrahim; IBRAHIM DOKA Dahiratou

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A study examining the influence of farming practices on soil fertility was conducted between 2015 and 2017 in Lélédjé, Moli Haoussa and Alambaré, three villages in the peripheral zone. The aim of this study was to compare variations in CMA biodiversity over time according to soil fertility management practices. Experiments were carried out in farming environments from 2015 to 2017 using randomised block designs in nine fields. Soil and root samples were taken during the tillering, stem elongation and grain filling stages. A morphological characterisation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal spores was carried out. The results revealed that Glomus and Gigaspora are the two genera of spores produced by these cultivation practices. The density of Glomus and Gigaspora is statistically higher in the mulching and control treatments (Glomus: 30.25; Gigaspora: 15.88). The analysis of variance showed no significant difference between years for the Glomus genus. However, unlike Glomus, Gigaspora was abundant in 2017 (17.25) compared to 2015 and 2016 (11.61 and 12.25, respectively). In view of the results obtained, Glomus appears to perform better than Gigaspora, as its abundance in mulching treatments and its resistance to environmental fluctuations make it preferable to Gigaspora. Mulching is therefore a farming practice for managing soil fertility that allows for good maintenance of CMA propagules. This could be an alternative to the use of mineral fertilisers, which are too expensive, unsuited to our environmental conditions and beyond the means of Nigerien farmers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus and Gigaspora were the two genera of arbuscular mycorrhizal spores produced under the cultivation practices.

Taxon
millett0
Interactor
GlomusGlomuse0symbiont
Second interactor
GigasporaGigasporae0symbiont
Outcome
two genera of sporese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glomus
Glomus · InteractorJerry Cooper · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Gigaspora
Gigaspora · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Mike Guether · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–52 · show in text ↑
e0

“Glomus and Gigaspora are the two genera of spores produced by these cultivation practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–733 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus spore density was statistically higher in the mulching and control treatments (30.25).

Taxon
millett0
Treatment
mulchinge0
Interactor
GlomusGlomuse0symbiont
Outcome
densitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
30.25e0
Qualifier
control treatmentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glomus
Glomus · InteractorJerry Cooper · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–52 · show in text ↑
e0

“The density of Glomus and Gigaspora is statistically higher in the mulching and control treatments (Glomus: 30.25; Gigaspora: 15.88)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–867 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gigaspora spore density was statistically higher in the mulching and control treatments (15.88).

Taxon
millett0
Treatment
mulchinge0
Interactor
GigasporaGigasporae0symbiont
Outcome
densitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
15.88e0
Qualifier
control treatmentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gigaspora
Gigaspora · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Mike Guether · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–52 · show in text ↑
e0

“The density of Glomus and Gigaspora is statistically higher in the mulching and control treatments (Glomus: 30.25; Gigaspora: 15.88)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–867 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus showed no significant difference between years.

Taxon
millett0
Interactor
GlomusGlomuse0symbiont
Outcome
no significant difference between yearse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glomus
Glomus · InteractorJerry Cooper · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–52 · show in text ↑
e0

“no significant difference between years for the Glomus genus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–961 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gigaspora was more abundant in 2017 (17.25) than in 2015 and 2016 (11.61 and 12.25).

Taxon
millett0
Interactor
GigasporaGigasporae0symbiont
Outcome
abundante0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
17.25e0
Qualifier
11.61 and 12.25e0
Comparator
2015 and 2016e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gigaspora
Gigaspora · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Mike Guether · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–52 · show in text ↑
e0

“Gigaspora was abundant in 2017 (17.25) compared to 2015 and 2016 (11.61 and 12.25, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1083 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that Glomus appears to perform better than Gigaspora.

Taxon
millett0
Interactor
GlomusGlomuse0symbiont
Second interactor
GigasporaGigasporae0symbiont
Outcome
perform bettere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glomus
Glomus · InteractorJerry Cooper · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Gigaspora
Gigaspora · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Mike Guether · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–52 · show in text ↑
e0

“Glomus appears to perform better than Gigaspora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1165 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that mulching is a soil fertility management practice that allows good maintenance of AMF propagules.

Taxon
millett0
Treatment
Mulchinge0
Outcome
good maintenance of CMA propagulese0

Verbatim

t0

“millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–52 · show in text ↑
e0

“Mulching is therefore a farming practice for managing soil fertility that allows for good maintenance of CMA propagules”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1408 · show in text ↑