Paper · 2026 · Plant Molecular Biology Reporter

Phenological, Pomological, and Molecular Characterization of Capuli (Prunus serotina Ehrh.) Accessions from the INIAP-Ecuador National Germplasm Bank for Breeding Purposes

Juan José Chucuri Malán; Germán Ortuño-Hernández; Khouloud Chtourou; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Prunu s sero tina Ehrh., commonly known as capuli, represents a valuable genetic resource for breeding programs aimed at improving fruit quality. This study presents the in situ morpho-agronomic and molecular characterization of sixty capuli accessions that were collected in situ and are currently conserved in the INIAP-Ecuador National Germplasm Bank. Thirty quantitative and qualitative traits were evaluated, supported by principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical clustering to explore phenotypic structure. ANOVA revealed significant regional differentiation in key fruit traits, including fruit weight ( p = 0.000015), equatorial and polar fruit diameter ( p = 0.0036 and p = 0.0015), epidermis weight ( p = 0.0065), and seed diameter ( p = 0.011), as well as floral traits such as flower diameter ( p = 0.0002) and sepal width ( p = 0.0018). Tukey’s post hoc comparisons indicated that the strongest contrasts occurred between Cotopaxi–Tungurahua and Chimborazo–Tungurahua. Molecular analysis using five SSR primer pairs (AB, PceGA34, PS12A02, Pchpgms3, and Pchgms2) revealed high genetic variability, with an average polymorphism information content (PIC) of 0.792. Population structure analysis (STRUCTURE and PCoA) identified three major genetic groups. The results demonstrate considerable phenotypic and genetic diversity, providing essential insights for breeding strategies aimed at developing superior capuli cultivars in Ecuador.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit weight differed significantly by region.

Outcome
fruit weighte0
Value
p = 0.000015e0
Setting
regionale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Physalis pubescens
Physalis pubescens · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant regional differentiation in key fruit traits, including fruit weight ( p = 0.000015)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–643 · show in text ↑
t0

“Capuli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Equatorial fruit diameter differed significantly by region.

Outcome
equatoriale0
Value
p = 0.0036e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Physalis pubescens
Physalis pubescens · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“equatorial and polar fruit diameter ( p = 0.0036 and p = 0.0015)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–709 · show in text ↑
t0

“Capuli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Polar fruit diameter differed significantly by region.

Outcome
polar fruit diametere0
Value
p = 0.0015e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Physalis pubescens
Physalis pubescens · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“equatorial and polar fruit diameter ( p = 0.0036 and p = 0.0015)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–709 · show in text ↑
t0

“Capuli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Epidermis weight differed significantly by region.

Outcome
epidermis weighte0
Value
p = 0.0065e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Physalis pubescens
Physalis pubescens · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“epidermis weight ( p = 0.0065)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–741 · show in text ↑
t0

“Capuli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed diameter differed significantly by region.

Outcome
seed diametere0
Value
p = 0.011e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Physalis pubescens
Physalis pubescens · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed diameter ( p = 0.011)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–773 · show in text ↑
t0

“Capuli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flower diameter differed significantly by region.

Outcome
flower diametere0
Value
p = 0.0002e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Physalis pubescens
Physalis pubescens · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“flower diameter ( p = 0.0002)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–837 · show in text ↑
t0

“Capuli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sepal width differed significantly by region.

Outcome
sepal widthe0
Value
p = 0.0018e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Physalis pubescens
Physalis pubescens · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sepal width ( p = 0.0018)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–867 · show in text ↑
t0

“Capuli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The strongest trait contrasts involved Cotopaxi–Tungurahua and Chimborazo–Tungurahua.

Outcome
contrastse0
Direction
strongeste0
Setting
Cotopaxi–Tungurahua and Chimborazo–Tungurahuae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Physalis pubescens
Physalis pubescens · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strongest contrasts occurred between Cotopaxi–Tungurahua and Chimborazo–Tungurahua”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–999 · show in text ↑
t0

“Capuli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The five SSR markers had average PIC of 0.792, indicating high genetic variability.

Outcome
polymorphism information content (PIC)e0
Direction
highe0
Value
0.792e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Physalis pubescens
Physalis pubescens · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high genetic variability, with an average polymorphism information content (PIC) of 0.792”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1192 · show in text ↑
t0

“Capuli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Population structure analysis identified three major genetic groups.

Outcome
genetic groupse0
Value
threee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Physalis pubescens
Physalis pubescens · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“identified three major genetic groups”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1282 · show in text ↑
t0

“Capuli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67 · show in text ↑