Paper · 2026 · Journal of Integrative Agriculture

Simultaneous silencing of ten essential Sclerotinia sclerotiorum genes via spray- and host-induced gene silencing enhances against Sclerotinia stem rot resistance in oilseed rape

Sichao Ren; Ying Zhang; Yi Ye; et al.

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

A 1,250-bp chimeric dsRNA simultaneously targeting ten Sclerotinia sclerotiorum genes effectively suppresses fungal development and pathogenicity. Both spray-induced (SIGS) and host-induced (HIGS) gene silencing confer enhanced resistance to Sclerotinia stem rot in oilseed rape. HIGS transgenic lines show stable, heritable resistance across multiple generations without compromising yield performance. Sclerotinia stem rot (SSR) is caused by the necrotrophic fungus Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and threatens global oilseed rape ( Brassica napus ) production. Moreover, researchers have not yet identified a gene that confers complete resistance. Here, we developed a multi-target RNA interference (RNAi) strategy to enhance plant resistance by simultaneously silencing eight fungal genes involved in development ( SsChsI–VII , SsGas1 ) and two involved in pathogenicity ( SsPG1 , SsOAH1 ) of S . sclerotiorum . Accordingly, we designed a 1,250-bp chimeric double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) consisting of ten 125-bp fragments each targeting a different gene, and evaluated its effectiveness using spray-induced gene silencing (SIGS) and host-induced gene silencing (HIGS) via stable transformation. In vitro application of the chimeric dsRNA resulted in >50% downregulation of nine target genes, indicating efficient uptake and processing by S . sclerotiorum . Both lesion area and fungal biomass were significantly lower in Nicotiana benthamiana and oilseed rape plants following SIGS. Moreover, stable transgenic plants for HIGS effectively generated gene-specific short interfering RNAs and exhibited an increase in resistance from the T 2 to T 5 generations, with lesions that were 38.9–59.1% smaller in leaves and 43.2–65.8% smaller in stems in the T 5 generation compared with the control plants. Gene silencing resulted in lower oxalic acid accumulation, decreased polygalacturonase activity, and impaired hyphal development, suggesting interference with multiple fungal infection pathways. Notably, HIGS conferred stable, heritable resistance without yield penalty, whereas SIGS provided rapid, nontransgenic protection. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of long chimeric dsRNAs for multi-target gene silencing and highlights a promising RNAi-based strategy for improving disease resistance in oilseed rape, possibly in combination with natural quantitative resistance loci.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chimeric dsRNA downregulated nine fungal target genes by more than 50% in vitro.

Taxon
oilseed rapeBrassica napust0
Treatment
chimeric dsRNAe0
Interactor
Sclerotinia sclerotiorumSclerotinia sclerotiorumt0pathogen
Outcome
downregulation of nine target genese0
Direction
downregulatione0
Value
>50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sclerotinia sclerotiorum genes via spray- and host-induced gene silencing enhances against Sclerotinia stem rot resistance in oilseed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–178 · show in text ↑
e0

“In vitro application of the chimeric dsRNA resulted in >50% downregulation of nine target genes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1286 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spray-induced silencing reduced lesion area and fungal biomass in Nicotiana benthamiana.

Taxon
Nicotiana benthamianaNicotiana benthamianae0
Treatment
SIGSe0
Outcome
lesion area and fungal biomasse0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana benthamiana
Nicotiana benthamiana · TaxonCharles Andres · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both lesion area and fungal biomass were significantly lower in Nicotiana benthamiana and oilseed rape plants following SIGS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1353–1477 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spray-induced silencing reduced lesion area and fungal biomass in oilseed rape.

Taxon
oilseed rapeBrassica napuse0
Treatment
SIGSe0
Interactor
Sclerotinia sclerotiorumSclerotinia sclerotiorumt0pathogen
Outcome
lesion area and fungal biomasse0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sclerotinia sclerotiorum genes via spray- and host-induced gene silencing enhances against Sclerotinia stem rot resistance in oilseed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–178 · show in text ↑
e0

“Both lesion area and fungal biomass were significantly lower in Nicotiana benthamiana and oilseed rape plants following SIGS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1353–1477 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Host-induced silencing plants produced gene-specific small interfering RNAs.

Taxon
oilseed rapeBrassica napust0
Treatment
HIGSe0
Outcome
gene-specific short interfering RNAse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sclerotinia sclerotiorum genes via spray- and host-induced gene silencing enhances against Sclerotinia stem rot resistance in oilseed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–178 · show in text ↑
e0

“stable transgenic plants for HIGS effectively generated gene-specific short interfering RNAs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1489–1581 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Host-induced silencing resistance increased from T2 to T5 generations.

Taxon
oilseed rapeBrassica napust0
Interactor
Sclerotinia sclerotiorumSclerotinia sclerotiorumt0pathogen
Outcome
resistancee0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
from the T 2 to T 5 generationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sclerotinia sclerotiorum genes via spray- and host-induced gene silencing enhances against Sclerotinia stem rot resistance in oilseed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–178 · show in text ↑
e0

“exhibited an increase in resistance from the T 2 to T 5 generations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1586–1653 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 HIGS leaf lesions were 38.9–59.1% smaller than controls.

Taxon
oilseed rapeBrassica napust0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
host-induced gene silencingt0
Interactor
Sclerotinia sclerotiorumSclerotinia sclerotiorumt0pathogen
Outcome
lesionse0
Direction
smallere0
Value
38.9–59.1%e0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sclerotinia sclerotiorum genes via spray- and host-induced gene silencing enhances against Sclerotinia stem rot resistance in oilseed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–178 · show in text ↑
e0

“lesions that were 38.9–59.1% smaller in leaves and 43.2–65.8% smaller in stems in the T 5 generation compared with the control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1660–1793 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 HIGS stem lesions were 43.2–65.8% smaller than controls.

Taxon
oilseed rapeBrassica napust0
Organ / stage
stemse0
Treatment
host-induced gene silencingt0
Interactor
Sclerotinia sclerotiorumSclerotinia sclerotiorumt0pathogen
Outcome
lesionse0
Direction
smallere0
Value
43.2–65.8%e0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sclerotinia sclerotiorum genes via spray- and host-induced gene silencing enhances against Sclerotinia stem rot resistance in oilseed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–178 · show in text ↑
e0

“lesions that were 38.9–59.1% smaller in leaves and 43.2–65.8% smaller in stems in the T 5 generation compared with the control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1660–1793 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gene silencing lowered fungal oxalic acid accumulation, polygalacturonase activity, and hyphal development.

Taxon
oilseed rapeBrassica napust0
Treatment
Gene silencinge0
Interactor
Sclerotinia sclerotiorumSclerotinia sclerotiorumt0pathogen
Outcome
oxalic acid accumulation, decreased polygalacturonase activity, and impaired hyphal developmente0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sclerotinia sclerotiorum genes via spray- and host-induced gene silencing enhances against Sclerotinia stem rot resistance in oilseed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–178 · show in text ↑
e0

“Gene silencing resulted in lower oxalic acid accumulation, decreased polygalacturonase activity, and impaired hyphal development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1795–1923 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HIGS resistance was stable and heritable without a yield penalty.

Taxon
oilseed rapeBrassica napust0
Treatment
HIGSe0
Interactor
Sclerotinia sclerotiorumSclerotinia sclerotiorumt0pathogen
Outcome
stable, heritable resistance without yield penaltye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sclerotinia sclerotiorum genes via spray- and host-induced gene silencing enhances against Sclerotinia stem rot resistance in oilseed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–178 · show in text ↑
e0

“HIGS conferred stable, heritable resistance without yield penalty”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1999–2064 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SIGS supplied rapid nontransgenic protection.

Taxon
oilseed rapeBrassica napust0
Treatment
SIGSe0
Interactor
Sclerotinia sclerotiorumSclerotinia sclerotiorumt0pathogen
Outcome
rapid, nontransgenic protectione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sclerotinia sclerotiorum genes via spray- and host-induced gene silencing enhances against Sclerotinia stem rot resistance in oilseed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–178 · show in text ↑
e0

“SIGS provided rapid, nontransgenic protection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2074–2119 · show in text ↑

double-stranded RNA · Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

loss of function · soil: biology · Nicotiana benthamianaPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

loss of function · Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

application · Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 9 positive, 7 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.