Abstract
Abstract Plant root growth accounts for a major part of the net primary production in grassland and forest ecosystems and influences the global carbon and nutrient cycles. Measuring the production of roots is inherently difficult, prone to inconsistencies and time‐consuming. Notably, there are currently no methods yet to automate this task. We have developed GINGER, a new method for automated estimation of the fine root production from a time series of minirhizotron images. It compares pairs of consecutive images with each other, separating new root growth from standing crop. The method was evaluated on four datasets from grassland, drained fen peatland and forest ecosystems. It exhibits performance on a similar level to that of human annotators while substantially reducing the time required for the data analysis. Human annotators showed a significant degree of variability among each other, confirming that the task is subjective and error‐prone. For demonstration, this pipeline was applied on two real‐world image datasets, spanning 2 and 3 years, to compute the total annual root production. End‐to‐end, including annotation and model training, GINGER reduced the required human workload from several thousand to less than 40 work hours. It could allow to scale up monitoring efforts and enable full automation in the future.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
GINGER performs on a similar level to human annotators in estimating fine root production while substantially reducing data analysis time.
Verbatim
e0“It exhibits performance on a similar level to that of human annotators while substantially reducing the time required for the data analysis”
Claim · model-written summary
Human annotators showed a significant degree of variability among each other, indicating the root annotation task is subjective and error-prone.
- Outcome
- variabilitye1
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e1“Human annotators showed a significant degree of variability among each other”
Claim · model-written summary
End to end, GINGER reduced the required human workload from several thousand to less than 40 work hours.
Verbatim
e2“GINGER reduced the required human workload from several thousand to less than 40 work hours”