Paper · 2026 · Plants

Herbivory on Banker Plants Enhances Resistance-Related Responses of Neighboring Tomato Plants to the Two-Spotted Spider Mite

Tomoya Tasaki; Yuka Okemoto; Karin Nakamura; et al.

5
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Banker plants are non-crop plants that sustain populations of biological control agents prior to pest outbreaks, offering a preventive strategy within integrated pest management (IPM). Their benefits have primarily been attributed to top-down regulation via natural enemy-mediated pest suppression; however, their potential bottom-up effects remain largely unexplored. Here, we show that airborne cues emitted from banker plants infested with the zoophytophagous mirid bug Nesidiocoris tenuis altered the performance of the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae on neighboring tomato plants Solanum lycopersicum. Exposure to airborne cues from infested sesame Sesamum indicum significantly reduced mite fecundity, whereas those from tomato and spider flower Cleome hassleriana had no detectable effect, indicating that the induction of crop resistance is dependent on banker plant species. Moreover, T. urticae infestation of banker plants consistently suppressed mite oviposition on neighboring tomato plants across all banker plant species tested. These findings suggest that banker plants can exert previously unrecognized bottom-up effects by modulating crop resistance-related responses through airborne cues. Therefore, selecting banker plant species that emit effective airborne cues may strengthen crop protection and stabilize biological control performance in sustainable IPM strategies.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Airborne cues from sesame infested by Nesidiocoris tenuis significantly reduced Tetranychus urticae fecundity on tomato.

Taxon
Solanum lycopersicumSolanum lycopersicume0
Treatment
airborne cues from infested sesame Sesamum indicume3
Interactor
Tetranychus urticaeTetranychus urticaee1pest
Second interactor
Nesidiocoris tenuisNesidiocoris tenuise2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
mite fecunditye3
Direction
reducede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tetranychus urticae
Tetranychus urticae · InteractorGilles San Martin from Namur, Belgium · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Nesidiocoris tenuis
Nesidiocoris tenuis · Second interactorGüney Baloğlu · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato plants Solanum lycopersicum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–617 · show in text ↑
e1

“the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–567 · show in text ↑
e2

“zoophytophagous mirid bug Nesidiocoris tenuis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–492 · show in text ↑
e3

“Exposure to airborne cues from infested sesame Sesamum indicum significantly reduced mite fecundity, whereas those from tomato and spider flower Cleome hassleriana had no detectable effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–807 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Airborne cues from tomato and spider flower Cleome hassleriana had no detectable effect on Tetranychus urticae fecundity.

Taxon
Solanum lycopersicumSolanum lycopersicume0
Treatment
tomato and spider flower Cleome hasslerianae3
Interactor
Tetranychus urticaeTetranychus urticaee1pest
Outcome
mite fecunditye3
Direction
no detectable effecte3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tetranychus urticae
Tetranychus urticae · InteractorGilles San Martin from Namur, Belgium · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato plants Solanum lycopersicum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–617 · show in text ↑
e1

“the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–567 · show in text ↑
e3

“Exposure to airborne cues from infested sesame Sesamum indicum significantly reduced mite fecundity, whereas those from tomato and spider flower Cleome hassleriana had no detectable effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–807 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tetranychus urticae infestation of banker plants consistently suppressed mite oviposition on neighbouring tomato.

Taxon
Solanum lycopersicumSolanum lycopersicume0
Treatment
T. urticae infestation of banker plantse4
Interactor
T. urticaeTetranychus urticaee4pest
Outcome
mite ovipositione4
Direction
suppressede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tetranychus urticae
Tetranychus urticae · InteractorGilles San Martin from Namur, Belgium · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato plants Solanum lycopersicum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–617 · show in text ↑
e4

“T. urticae infestation of banker plants consistently suppressed mite oviposition on neighboring tomato plants across all banker plant species tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1054 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The induction of crop resistance depends on the banker plant species.

Taxon
Solanum lycopersicumSolanum lycopersicume0
Treatment
banker plant speciese5
Outcome
induction of crop resistancee5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato plants Solanum lycopersicum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–617 · show in text ↑
e5

“the induction of crop resistance is dependent on banker plant species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–894 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Selecting banker plant species that emit effective airborne cues may strengthen crop protection.

Taxon
banker plant speciese6
Outcome
crop protectione6

Verbatim

e6

“selecting banker plant species that emit effective airborne cues may strengthen crop protection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1327 · show in text ↑

infection · Tetranychus urticae · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

infection · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 10 positive, 6 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.