Abstract
The interest in new natural products and herbal raw materials increases in a variety of scientific and industrial fields, but many plant taxa of restricted distribution tend to be overlooked as potential assets. Their large number precludes their study and valorisation. Therefore, there is a dire need to develop tools for assessing the plant taxa potential as ecosystem service providers, to prioritise the research efforts and to enhance conservation priorities. With the aim of identifying taxa of interest as potential medicinal and aromatic plants (MAP), amongst the taxa of a given flora, we developed a set of indicators. These indicators are based on the available scientific literature and are formulated even for taxa of restricted distribution, based on their closely-related species in terms of phylogeny, taxonomy (same species or same genus within the flora) or in use as approved herbal medicine or edible crops. The developed indicators are herein applied to the endemic flora of the Peloponnese, a floristic region of Greece with high total - and endemic - species diversity. Even though only 12.5% of the endemic taxa have previously been documented as MAP, the use of indicators suggests 58.3% of the flora as of non-null MAP potential (Indicator I 1 ), while 74.1% of the taxa obtained a non-null value of Study Interest Index (Indicator I 2 ). The results suggest 25 taxa as of high MAP potential, whereas 24 taxa are emphasised as of high-priority for further studies. This is, to our knowledge, the first attempt to establish a systematic literature-based method to assess potentially significant edible, medicinal and/or aromatic taxa.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Only 12.5% of the endemic taxa of the Peloponnese have previously been documented as medicinal and aromatic plants.
Verbatim
t0“endemic plants”
e0“only 12.5% of the endemic taxa have previously been documented as MAP”
Claim · model-written summary
Use of the indicators suggests 58.3% of the endemic flora has non-null medicinal and aromatic potential (Indicator I1).
Verbatim
t0“endemic plants”
e0“the use of indicators suggests 58.3% of the flora as of non-null MAP potential (Indicator I 1 )”
Claim · model-written summary
74.1% of the taxa obtained a non-null value of the Study Interest Index (Indicator I2).
Verbatim
t0“endemic plants”
e0“74.1% of the taxa obtained a non-null value of Study Interest Index (Indicator I 2 )”
Claim · model-written summary
The indicators identify 25 taxa as having high medicinal and aromatic potential.
Verbatim
t0“endemic plants”
e0“25 taxa as of high MAP potential”
Claim · model-written summary
The indicators emphasise 24 taxa as high priority for further studies.
Verbatim
t0“endemic plants”
e0“24 taxa are emphasised as of high-priority for further studies”