Paper · 2026 · Plant Ecology and Evolution

Geographic variation in compensation to damage in common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca)

Emily K. Mohl; Kate E. Noel; Patricia A. Saunders; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Background and aims – Plants display a variety of resistance and tolerance responses to herbivory. Compensation, or changes in growth, allocation, and/or physiology, after damage is one way that plants tolerate herbivory, but geographic patterns in intraspecific plant compensatory responses are understudied. We aimed to study geographic variation in tolerance to herbivory to help explain geographic patterns in the distribution of resistance traits and the relationship between tolerance and resistance traits in common milkweed, Asclepias syriaca . Material and methods – We grew milkweed from 14 different populations in the greenhouse, mechanically applied 25% leaf damage to an experimental group, and compared the control and experimental groups to measure compensatory responses in final biomass, root:shoot ratios, stem investment, and relative growth rate. We compared compensatory responses across populations grouped by latitude and by temperature. Key results – Compared to controls, milkweed plants that were damaged lost mass and expressed reduced root:shoot ratios. However, the effect of damage on total mass, stem investment, and relative growth rate varied among genetic families. In regional contrasts, plants from colder climates grew larger and invested less in stems and roots than plants from warmer climates under control conditions, but they were less able to compensate for damage in terms of biomass. Plants from cold regions also showed a tendency to reduce growth rate and stem investment after damage; whereas, plants from warmer climates tended to increase their growth rate and stem investment in response to damage. Conclusion – While plants from high latitudes and colder climates were less able to compensate for damage than those from lower latitudes, we are not confident that these differences are caused by geographic differences in growth rate, or that they explain differences in resistance to herbivory. Instead, we suspect that differences in the phenology of development in plants from regions with different climates affect the impact of damage and the potential for compensatory growth. Milkweed plants from colder regions with short growing seasons grew larger during our measurement period, while those from regions with longer growing seasons invested more in stems and roots, traits which may have facilitated greater long-term growth, as well as the greater compensatory ability observed in our study. Future studies should explicitly manipulate the timing of damage applied to plants from different regions to test the relationship between phenology and compensation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Damaged milkweed plants lost mass compared with undamaged controls.

Taxon
milkweede0
Treatment
damagede0
Outcome
masse0
Direction
loste0
Comparator
controlse0

Verbatim

t0

“common milkweed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“Compared to controls, milkweed plants that were damaged lost mass and expressed reduced root:shoot ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1081 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Damaged milkweed plants had reduced root:shoot ratios compared with controls.

Taxon
milkweede0
Treatment
damagede0
Outcome
root:shoot ratiose0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
controlse0

Verbatim

t0

“common milkweed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“Compared to controls, milkweed plants that were damaged lost mass and expressed reduced root:shoot ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1081 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effect of damage on total mass, stem investment and relative growth rate varied among genetic families of common milkweed.

Taxon
common milkweedt0
Material
genetic familiese0
Treatment
damagee0
Outcome
total mass, stem investment, and relative growth ratee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“common milkweed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“the effect of damage on total mass, stem investment, and relative growth rate varied among genetic families”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1199 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under control conditions, plants from colder climates grew larger than plants from warmer climates.

Taxon
common milkweedt0
Material
plants from colder climatese0
Outcome
grew largere0
Direction
largere0
Comparator
plants from warmer climatese0
Setting
control conditionse0

Verbatim

t0

“common milkweed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“plants from colder climates grew larger and invested less in stems and roots than plants from warmer climates under control conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1358 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under control conditions, plants from colder climates invested less in stems and roots than plants from warmer climates.

Taxon
common milkweedt0
Material
plants from colder climatese0
Outcome
invested less in stems and rootse0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
plants from warmer climatese0
Setting
control conditionse0

Verbatim

t0

“common milkweed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“plants from colder climates grew larger and invested less in stems and roots than plants from warmer climates under control conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1358 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants from colder climates were less able to compensate for damage in terms of biomass than plants from warmer climates.

Taxon
common milkweedt0
Outcome
compensate for damage in terms of biomasse0
Direction
less ablee0

Verbatim

t0

“common milkweed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“but they were less able to compensate for damage in terms of biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1360–1428 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants from cold regions tended to reduce growth rate and stem investment after damage.

Taxon
common milkweedt0
Material
Plants from cold regionse0
Treatment
damagee0
Outcome
growth rate and stem investmente0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“common milkweed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“Plants from cold regions also showed a tendency to reduce growth rate and stem investment after damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1430–1532 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants from warmer climates tended to increase their growth rate and stem investment in response to damage.

Taxon
common milkweedt0
Material
plants from warmer climatese0
Treatment
damagee0
Outcome
growth rate and stem investmente0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“common milkweed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“plants from warmer climates tended to increase their growth rate and stem investment in response to damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1543–1649 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suspect that differences in developmental phenology among plants from different climates affect the impact of damage and the potential for compensatory growth.

Taxon
common milkweedt0
Outcome
impact of damage and the potential for compensatory growthe0
Qualifier
phenology of developmente0

Verbatim

t0

“common milkweed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“we suspect that differences in the phenology of development in plants from regions with different climates affect the impact of damage and the potential for compensatory growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1957–2133 · show in text ↑