Paper · 2004 · OpenAgrar

Niepold, Frank; Stachewicz, Hans

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The ITS-DNA region of Synchytrium endobioticum (Schilb.) Pere., rhe causal agent of poraro wart disease, was used ro generate specific PCR primers for molecular diagnosis of rhe disease. DNA was extracted from wart galls of all S. endobioticum pathotypes (I, 2, 6, 18) currently occurring and used for official resting purposes in Germany. Using the universal ITS primer # 4 and the S. endobioticumspecific primer Kbrl, a PCR fragment of 543 bp was obtained from all four fungal pathocypes. DNA for PCR-based diagnosis of the fungus could be extracted easily from summer sori, however, we did nor succeed ro extract amplifiable DNA from resting sori found in contaminated soils. To circumvent rhis problem, zoospores emerging from resring sori were used for DNA exrracrion and indirect detection. PCR also allowed ro discriminate between weakly resistant and moderately susceptible responses of potaro culrivars in addition ro rhe routine visual inspection, since only alive summer sori of the weakly susceptible reacting poraro culrivars released quantities of zoospores sufficient ro be detected. No PCR signal was obtained from weakly or completely resistant potaro cultivars.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCR yielded a 543 bp fragment from all four fungal pathotypes.

Taxon
potaroe1
Outcome
PCR fragmente0
Value
543 bpe0
Qualifier
all four fungal pathocypese0

Verbatim

e0

“a PCR fragment of 543 bp was obtained from all four fungal pathocypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–489 · show in text ↑
e1

“PCR also allowed ro discriminate between weakly resistant and moderately susceptible responses of potaro culrivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–911 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DNA was readily extracted from summer sori.

Taxon
Synchytrium endobioticumSynchytrium endobioticume1
Organ / stage
summer sorie0
Outcome
DNA for PCR-based diagnosise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Synchytrium endobioticum
Synchytrium endobioticum · TaxonUSDA-APHIS-PPQ · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DNA for PCR-based diagnosis of the fungus could be extracted easily from summer sori”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–575 · show in text ↑
e1

“Synchytrium endobioticum (Schilb.) Pere.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amplifiable DNA could not be extracted from resting sori in contaminated soil.

Taxon
Synchytrium endobioticumSynchytrium endobioticume1
Organ / stage
resting sorie0
Outcome
amplifiable DNAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Synchytrium endobioticum
Synchytrium endobioticum · TaxonUSDA-APHIS-PPQ · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we did nor succeed ro extract amplifiable DNA from resting sori found in contaminated soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–677 · show in text ↑
e1

“Synchytrium endobioticum (Schilb.) Pere.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–62 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zoospores emerging from resting sori enabled indirect DNA detection.

Taxon
potaroe1
Outcome
indirect detectione0
Value
zoosporese0

Verbatim

e0

“zoospores emerging from resring sori were used for DNA exrracrion and indirect detection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–795 · show in text ↑
e1

“PCR also allowed ro discriminate between weakly resistant and moderately susceptible responses of potaro culrivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–911 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCR distinguished weakly resistant from moderately susceptible potato cultivar responses.

Taxon
potaroe0
Outcome
discriminate between weakly resistant and moderately susceptible responsese0
Value
weakly resistant and moderately susceptiblee0

Verbatim

e0

“PCR also allowed ro discriminate between weakly resistant and moderately susceptible responses of potaro culrivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–911 · show in text ↑