Paper · 2026 · AIP Advances

An integrated perception and navigation system for autonomous orchard vehicle

Yanyan Lin; Xingyu Lin; Zhengkun Cheng

13
claims
28
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Environmental perception in unstructured agricultural settings represents a fundamental challenge for autonomous orchard robotics. This study presents a real-time decision-level fusion framework integrating 32-channel LiDAR with a monocular camera for tree detection and localization in orchard environments. The perception system incorporates three key innovations: (1) triple-stage point cloud preprocessing utilizing region-of-interest segmentation, RANSAC-based ground removal, and intensity-based filtering to reduce computational load by 68%; (2) enhanced DBSCAN clustering with adaptive cluster merging and geometric shape filtering specifically optimized for tree morphology; and (3) decision-level fusion employing the Hungarian algorithm for optimal sensor association with semantic validation. A custom orchard dataset comprising 5000 annotated images was collected to train the YOLOv7 detection model, achieving 95.9% precision, 95.7% recall, and 75.2% mAP@0.5:0.95 on the test set. Experimental validation in a simulated orchard demonstrated superior performance: the fusion system achieved 97.80% precision and 96.50% recall, representing a 4.36% precision improvement over enhanced single-sensor approaches and a 29.44% gain vs baseline methods. Real-time processing capability was maintained at 41 ms per frame (24.4 FPS) with a 10-m effective perception range on moderate-cost hardware. Temporal robustness analysis across 100-frame sequences confirmed stable operation with 69% perfect detection, which is substantially higher than single-sensor methods. Field trials validated that the proposed LiDAR–camera fusion framework provides sufficient perception accuracy, robustness, and real-time performance to support practical autonomous navigation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Point cloud preprocessing reduced computational load by 68%.

Taxon
orchardt0
Outcome
computational loade0
Direction
reducee0
Value
68%e0

Verbatim

e0

“triple-stage point cloud preprocessing utilizing region-of-interest segmentation, RANSAC-based ground removal, and intensity-based filtering to reduce computational load by 68%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 371–547 · show in text ↑
t0

“orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–69 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

YOLOv7 achieved 95.9% precision on the orchard test set.

Taxon
orchardt0
Outcome
precisione0
Value
95.9%e0

Verbatim

e0

“achieving 95.9% precision, 95.7% recall, and 75.2% mAP@0.5:0.95”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–69 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

YOLOv7 achieved 95.7% recall on the orchard test set.

Taxon
orchardt0
Outcome
recalle0
Value
95.7%e0

Verbatim

e0

“achieving 95.9% precision, 95.7% recall, and 75.2% mAP@0.5:0.95”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–69 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

YOLOv7 achieved 75.2% mAP@0.5:0.95 on the orchard test set.

Taxon
orchardt0
Outcome
mAP@0.5:0.95e0
Value
75.2%e0

Verbatim

e0

“achieving 95.9% precision, 95.7% recall, and 75.2% mAP@0.5:0.95”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–69 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fusion system achieved 97.80% precision in a simulated orchard.

Taxon
orchardt0
Outcome
precisione0
Value
97.80%e0
Setting
simulated orcharde1

Verbatim

e0

“the fusion system achieved 97.80% precision and 96.50% recall”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1138 · show in text ↑
e1

“Experimental validation in a simulated orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1041 · show in text ↑
t0

“orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–69 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fusion system achieved 96.50% recall in a simulated orchard.

Taxon
orchardt0
Outcome
recalle0
Value
96.50%e0
Setting
simulated orcharde1

Verbatim

e0

“the fusion system achieved 97.80% precision and 96.50% recall”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1138 · show in text ↑
e1

“Experimental validation in a simulated orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1041 · show in text ↑
t0

“orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–69 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusion precision improved by 4.36% over enhanced single-sensor approaches.

Taxon
orchardt0
Outcome
precisione0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
4.36%e0
Comparator
enhanced single-sensor approachese0

Verbatim

e0

“a 4.36% precision improvement over enhanced single-sensor approaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1221 · show in text ↑
t0

“orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–69 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusion precision gained 29.44% versus baseline methods.

Taxon
orchardt0
Outcome
gaine0
Direction
gaine0
Value
29.44%e0
Comparator
baseline methodse0

Verbatim

e0

“a 29.44% gain vs baseline methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1259 · show in text ↑
t0

“orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–69 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The system processed each frame in 41 ms.

Taxon
orchardt0
Outcome
processing capabilitye0
Value
41 ms per framee0

Verbatim

e0

“Real-time processing capability was maintained at 41 ms per frame (24.4 FPS) with a 10-m effective perception range”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1376 · show in text ↑
t0

“orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–69 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The system processed 24.4 FPS.

Taxon
orchardt0
Outcome
FPSe0
Value
24.4 FPSe0

Verbatim

e0

“41 ms per frame (24.4 FPS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1337 · show in text ↑
t0

“orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–69 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effective perception range was 10 m.

Taxon
orchardt0
Outcome
effective perception rangee0
Value
10-me0

Verbatim

e0

“10-m effective perception range”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1376 · show in text ↑
t0

“orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–69 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Across 100-frame sequences, perfect detection reached 69%, above single-sensor methods.

Taxon
orchardt0
Outcome
perfect detectione0
Direction
highere0
Value
69%e0
Qualifier
100-frame sequencese0
Comparator
single-sensor methodse0

Verbatim

e0

“across 100-frame sequences confirmed stable operation with 69% perfect detection, which is substantially higher than single-sensor methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1433–1571 · show in text ↑
t0

“orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–69 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field trials found fusion perception sufficient for practical autonomous navigation.

Taxon
orchardt0
Outcome
sufficient perception accuracy, robustness, and real-time performancee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Field trials validated that the proposed LiDAR–camera fusion framework provides sufficient perception accuracy, robustness, and real-time performance to support practical autonomous navigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1573–1765 · show in text ↑
t0

“orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–69 · show in text ↑