Paper · 2026 · Molecular Plant Pathology

Conserved ‘Late’ Effector Genes From Leptosphaeria maculans Inducing Gene‐For‐Gene Quantitative Resistance in Brassica napus Semi‐Winter Genotypes

Camille Rabeau; Armand Wagner; Nicolas Lapalu; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Leptosphaeria maculans is a phytopathogenic fungus responsible for stem canker on Brassica napus. Its infectious cycle goes through an early phase of leaf infection and a late phase of colonisation and infection of the stem. The disease is mainly controlled by plant genetic resistances targeting a limited set of early fungal effector genes overexpressed during leaf infection and located in dynamic repeat-rich genomic regions. Thus, these resistances can be rapidly overcome by the pathogen. To find new sources of resistance, we focused on late effector genes, expressed during stem infection and located in gene-rich regions. A previous study revealed a quantitative resistance in the stem, partly relying on a gene-for-gene interaction with a late effector gene. In this study, we deciphered whether all late effector genes shared the same genomic and evolutionary characteristics and if they could be more stable than early effector genes, rendering the resistance they trigger more durable. In addition, as previous studies highlighted new criteria for selecting late effectors and suggested B. napus semi-winter genotypes as an interesting genetic pool for uncovering resistance sources, we selected six new late effector gene candidates and screened an enlarged panel of semi-winter genotypes. We revealed that early and late effector genes diverged for most of their genomic characteristics, supporting the hypothesis of late effector genes being more conserved. Moreover, we revealed new resistance sources to late effector genes, almost all belonging to the semi-winter genetic pool, validating their importance to uncover new resistance sources.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early and late effector genes differed in most genomic characteristics, supporting greater conservation of late genes.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Interactor
Leptosphaeria maculansPlenodomus lingame0pathogen
Gene
early and late effector genese0
Outcome
genomic characteristicse0
Direction
divergede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Plenodomus lingam
Plenodomus lingam · InteractorJie-Hao Ou · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leptosphaeria maculans is a phytopathogenic fungus responsible for stem canker on Brassica napus. Its infectious cycle goes through an early phase of leaf infection and a late phase of colonisation and infection of the stem. The disease is mainly controlled by plant genetic resistances targeting a limited set of early fungal effector genes overexpressed during leaf infection and located in dynamic repeat-rich genomic regions. Thus, these resistances can be rapidly overcome by the pathogen. To find new sources of resistance, we focused on late effector genes, expressed during stem infection and located in gene-rich regions. A previous study revealed a quantitative resistance in the stem, partly relying on a gene-for-gene interaction with a late effector gene. In this study, we deciphered whether all late effector genes shared the same genomic and evolutionary characteristics and if they could be more stable than early effector genes, rendering the resistance they trigger more durable. In addition, as previous studies highlighted new criteria for selecting late effectors and suggested B. napus semi-winter genotypes as an interesting genetic pool for uncovering resistance sources, we selected six new late effector gene candidates and screened an enlarged panel of semi-winter genotypes. We revealed that early and late effector genes diverged for most of their genomic characteristics, supporting the hypothesis of late effector genes being more conserved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–1472 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–124 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The screen identified new resistance sources to late effector genes, nearly all in the semi-winter genetic pool.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Material
semi-winter genetic poole0
Interactor
Leptosphaeria maculansPlenodomus lingame0pathogen
Gene
late effector genese0
Outcome
new resistance sourcese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Plenodomus lingam
Plenodomus lingam · InteractorJie-Hao Ou · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leptosphaeria maculans is a phytopathogenic fungus responsible for stem canker on Brassica napus. Its infectious cycle goes through an early phase of leaf infection and a late phase of colonisation and infection of the stem. The disease is mainly controlled by plant genetic resistances targeting a limited set of early fungal effector genes overexpressed during leaf infection and located in dynamic repeat-rich genomic regions. Thus, these resistances can be rapidly overcome by the pathogen. To find new sources of resistance, we focused on late effector genes, expressed during stem infection and located in gene-rich regions. A previous study revealed a quantitative resistance in the stem, partly relying on a gene-for-gene interaction with a late effector gene. In this study, we deciphered whether all late effector genes shared the same genomic and evolutionary characteristics and if they could be more stable than early effector genes, rendering the resistance they trigger more durable. In addition, as previous studies highlighted new criteria for selecting late effectors and suggested B. napus semi-winter genotypes as an interesting genetic pool for uncovering resistance sources, we selected six new late effector gene candidates and screened an enlarged panel of semi-winter genotypes. We revealed that early and late effector genes diverged for most of their genomic characteristics, supporting the hypothesis of late effector genes being more conserved. Moreover, we revealed new resistance sources to late effector genes, almost all belonging to the semi-winter genetic pool”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–1595 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–124 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that semi-winter genotypes are important for finding new resistance sources.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Material
semi-winter genotypese0
Outcome
new resistance sourcese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“semi-winter genotypes as an interesting genetic pool for uncovering resistance sources, we selected six new late effector gene candidates and screened an enlarged panel of semi-winter genotypes. We revealed that early and late effector genes diverged for most of their genomic characteristics, supporting the hypothesis of late effector genes being more conserved. Moreover, we revealed new resistance sources to late effector genes, almost all belonging to the semi-winter genetic pool, validating their importance to uncover new resistance sources”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1658 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–124 · show in text ↑