Paper · 2026 · Journal of Advances in Biology & Biotechnology

Impact of Integrated Nutrient Management on Growth Attributes of Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) in a Semi-Arid Agroecosystem of Rajasthan, India

Mukesh Vishnoi; Vijay Laxmi; B. K. Pandey

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) is a vital pulse crop in the semi-arid regions of Rajasthan, India, where productivity is constrained by suboptimal nutrient management and poor soil fertility. The experimental soil was characterized as a sandy loam, slightly alkaline, with low organic carbon and available nitrogen. While Integrated Nutrient Management (INM)—which combines organic, inorganic, and biological nutrient sources—presents a sustainable solution, there is a research gap regarding the optimal combination for mungbean in this specific agro-climatic zone. This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of different INM strategies on the growth parameters of mungbean. A field experiment was carried out during the Zaid season of 2024 in a randomized block design with eight treatments, including various combinations of the recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF), farmyard manure (FYM), vermicompost (VC), and Rhizobium inoculation. Results demonstrated that the integrated application of 100% RDF with vermicompost (1 t ha⁻¹) and Rhizobium (T₈) consistently and significantly outperformed other treatments, leading to the greatest improvements in plant height (51.54 cm), primary branches (6.27), dry matter accumulation (12.38 g plant⁻¹), and leaf area index (2.44). This treatment also recorded the highest root nodulation. This study concludes that the conjunctive use of 100% RDF with vermicompost and Rhizobium is a superior nutrient management strategy. This approach not only enhances the vegetative growth of mungbean but also contributes to long-term agricultural sustainability by improving soil health, nutrient cycling, and resource-use efficiency in fragile, semi-arid agroecosystems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The integrated T₈ treatment gave the greatest plant height, 51.54 cm.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
100% RDF with vermicompost (1 t ha⁻¹) and Rhizobium (T₈)e0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
greateste0
Value
51.54 cme0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the integrated application of 100% RDF with vermicompost (1 t ha⁻¹) and Rhizobium (T₈) consistently and significantly outperformed other treatments, leading to the greatest improvements in plant height (51.54 cm), primary branches (6.27), dry matter accumulation (12.38 g plant⁻¹), and leaf area index (2.44).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1277 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The integrated T₈ treatment gave 6.27 primary branches, the greatest among treatments.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
100% RDF with vermicompost (1 t ha⁻¹) and Rhizobium (T₈)e0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
primary branchese0
Direction
greateste0
Value
6.27e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the integrated application of 100% RDF with vermicompost (1 t ha⁻¹) and Rhizobium (T₈) consistently and significantly outperformed other treatments, leading to the greatest improvements in plant height (51.54 cm), primary branches (6.27), dry matter accumulation (12.38 g plant⁻¹), and leaf area index (2.44).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1277 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The integrated T₈ treatment gave the greatest dry matter accumulation, 12.38 g plant⁻¹.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
100% RDF with vermicompost (1 t ha⁻¹) and Rhizobium (T₈)e0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
greateste0
Value
12.38 g plant⁻¹e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the integrated application of 100% RDF with vermicompost (1 t ha⁻¹) and Rhizobium (T₈) consistently and significantly outperformed other treatments, leading to the greatest improvements in plant height (51.54 cm), primary branches (6.27), dry matter accumulation (12.38 g plant⁻¹), and leaf area index (2.44).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1277 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The integrated T₈ treatment gave the greatest leaf area index, 2.44.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
100% RDF with vermicompost (1 t ha⁻¹) and Rhizobium (T₈)e0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
leaf area indexe0
Direction
greateste0
Value
2.44e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the integrated application of 100% RDF with vermicompost (1 t ha⁻¹) and Rhizobium (T₈) consistently and significantly outperformed other treatments, leading to the greatest improvements in plant height (51.54 cm), primary branches (6.27), dry matter accumulation (12.38 g plant⁻¹), and leaf area index (2.44).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1277 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The integrated T₈ treatment produced the highest root nodulation.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
100% RDF with vermicompost (1 t ha⁻¹) and Rhizobium (T₈)e1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
root nodulatione0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment also recorded the highest root nodulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1335 · show in text ↑
e1

“100% RDF with vermicompost (1 t ha⁻¹) and Rhizobium (T₈)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1054 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–73 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend combining 100% RDF, vermicompost and Rhizobium for mungbean nutrient management.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
conjunctive use of 100% RDF with vermicompost and Rhizobiume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the conjunctive use of 100% RDF with vermicompost and Rhizobium is a superior nutrient management strategy.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1469 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–73 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

123 papers: 121 positive, 2 negative or no effect

120 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

119 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

Rhizobium · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 51 positive, 2 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

Rhizobium · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

53 papers: 53 positive, 0 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

fertilization · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

69 papers: 67 positive, 2 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

fertilization · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 140 positive, 5 negative or no effect

139 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

375 papers: 364 positive, 11 negative or no effect

363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

371 papers more in this group

See all 375 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.