Paper · 2026 · Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture

Harvesting damage detection in maize ear harvesters based on the Fused Inverted Bottleneck Attention U-Net

Jun Fu; Chengyuan Zhang; Qiankun Fu; et al.

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Improper operating parameters in maize ear harvesters can cause physical damage to the ears, resulting in grain loss. To address the lack of real-time decision-making support for correcting improper operating parameters in maize ear harvesters, we designed a Fused Inverted Bottleneck and Attention mechanism combined U-Net model (FIBA U-Net) for real-time detection of maize ear damage. The encoder of FIBA U-Net replaces the first eight blocks of EfficientNet-B3 with Fused-MBConv, which enhances the model's feature extraction capability and significantly improves detection accuracy. The CBAM module is applied to the first two skip connections in the decoder of FIBA U-Net, effectively enhancing features in maize ear damage regions while suppressing irrelevant information such as lighting variations and background noise. We compare the performance of FIBA U-Net with Eff U-Net, ResNeSt50, ConvNeXt, and ViT in segmenting the complex boundary regions of ear stacking within the maize ear collection chamber. FIBA U-Net achieves the best performance across all evaluation metrics. The method achieved an overall accuracy of up to 98.61% in field tests. The damage detection rates for the bottom of the grain collection box differed from the actual damage rates by only 0.31% under partial coverage and 0.42% under full coverage, respectively. Experimental results demonstrate that the model significantly improves accuracy, making it suitable for deployment in the complex operating environment of maize ear harvesters. It provides valuable support for parameter optimisation of harvesting machinery and maize ear grading, and demonstrates strong potential for practical application and large-scale deployment. • Novel high-precision approach for maize ear harvest damage detection. • Real-time ear damage detection via TensorRT and INT8 Optimisation. • Fused-MBConv combined with CBAM enhances complex area detection. • The method sustains high performance even under varying light intensity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FIBA U-Net achieved the best performance across all evaluation metrics when compared with Eff U-Net, ResNeSt50, ConvNeXt and ViT for segmenting maize ear damage.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
performance across all evaluation metricse1
Direction
beste1
Comparator
Eff U-Net, ResNeSt50, ConvNeXt, and ViTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize ear harvesters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“We compare the performance of FIBA U-Net with Eff U-Net, ResNeSt50, ConvNeXt, and ViT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–914 · show in text ↑
e1

“FIBA U-Net achieves the best performance across all evaluation metrics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1085 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The method reached an overall accuracy of up to 98.61% in field tests.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
overall accuracye0
Value
98.61%e0
Setting
field testse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize ear harvesters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“The method achieved an overall accuracy of up to 98.61% in field tests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1157 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Damage detection rates at the bottom of the grain collection box differed from actual damage rates by only 0.31% under partial coverage.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
damage detection ratese0
Value
0.31%e0
Qualifier
under partial coveragee0
Comparator
actual damage ratese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize ear harvesters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“The damage detection rates for the bottom of the grain collection box differed from the actual damage rates by only 0.31% under partial coverage and 0.42% under full coverage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1333 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Damage detection rates at the bottom of the grain collection box differed from actual damage rates by only 0.42% under full coverage.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
damage detection ratese0
Value
0.42%e0
Qualifier
under full coveragee0
Comparator
actual damage ratese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize ear harvesters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“The damage detection rates for the bottom of the grain collection box differed from the actual damage rates by only 0.31% under partial coverage and 0.42% under full coverage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1333 · show in text ↑