Paper · 2026 · Agricultural Water Management

Global sensitivity analysis of crop and soil parameters of CERES-Maize model under different irrigation and fertilization regimes based on the EFAST method

Yu Tian; Cunzhen Pan; Zixuan Guo; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Sensitivity analysis is a key approach to identify the influential parameters in crop models and improve calibration efficiency. This study employed the extended Fourier amplitude sensitivity test (EFAST) to evaluate the sensitivity of 10 crop parameters (cultivar and ecotype) and 22 soil parameters in the DSSAT-CERES-Maize model under different irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer regimes. The outputs included the state variables: anthesis date (ADAP), maturity date (MDAP), yield, grain protein content (GPC), maximum leaf area index (LAIX), and maximum aboveground biomass (CWADX), and the time-series variables: LAI, above ground biomass (CWAD), and nitrogen accumulation (CNAD). Results showed that the cultivar parameters, P1, P2, PHINT and P5, consistently dominated the simulation of anthesis and maturity stages, and their sensitivities remained stable across different water and nitrogen treatments. For LAIX and CWADX, the P1, PHINT and SRGF are the most influential parameters under different irrigation regimes. Under different nitrogen fertilizer regimes, the RUE is the most sensitive ecotype parameter, and the SDUL and SLLL show heigh sensitivity. Time-series variables display distinct stage-specific sensitivity patterns. Under different irrigation regimes, the PHINT is the most sensitive parameter for LAI, CWAD, and CNAD before jointing. The influence of P1 on CNAD approachs to peak after jointing, and the SRGF is highly sensitive for CNAD before tasseling. In comparison with water treatments, the sensitive period of PHINT to time-series variables is significantly shorter under nitrogen treatments, whereas RUE remains sensitive to LAI and CWAD throughout the growing season. For CNAD, the TSI of cultivar, ecotype and soil parameters are the highest at the seedling stage under both water and nitrogen stresses. The findings provide a theoretical basis for optimizing model parameterization and simulating crop responses, especially for precision-agriculture applications under different water and nitrogen regimes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar parameters P1, P2, PHINT and P5 consistently dominated the simulated anthesis and maturity stages, with stable sensitivity across water and nitrogen treatments.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
sensitivitiese1
Direction
remained stablee1
Comparator
different water and nitrogen treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CERES-Maize model”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–76 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results showed that the cultivar parameters, P1, P2, PHINT and P5, consistently dominated the simulation of anthesis and maturity stages, and their sensitivities remained stable across different water and nitrogen treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–910 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar parameters dominated the simulation of anthesis and maturity stages in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
simulation of anthesis and maturity stagese1
Direction
dominatede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CERES-Maize model”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–76 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results showed that the cultivar parameters, P1, P2, PHINT and P5, consistently dominated the simulation of anthesis and maturity stages, and their sensitivities remained stable across different water and nitrogen treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–910 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Under different irrigation regimes, P1, PHINT and SRGF are the most influential parameters for LAIX and CWADX.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
LAIX and CWADXe3
Direction
most influentiale3
Qualifier
P1, PHINT and SRGFe3
Comparator
different irrigation regimese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CERES-Maize model”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–76 · show in text ↑
e3

“For LAIX and CWADX, the P1, PHINT and SRGF are the most influential parameters under different irrigation regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1025 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Under different nitrogen fertilizer regimes, RUE is the most sensitive ecotype parameter.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
most sensitive ecotype parametere4
Comparator
different nitrogen fertilizer regimese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CERES-Maize model”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–76 · show in text ↑
e4

“Under different nitrogen fertilizer regimes, the RUE is the most sensitive ecotype parameter, and the SDUL and SLLL show heigh sensitivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1165 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Under different nitrogen fertilizer regimes, SDUL and SLLL show high sensitivity.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
sensitivitye4
Qualifier
SDUL and SLLLe4
Comparator
different nitrogen fertilizer regimese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CERES-Maize model”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–76 · show in text ↑
e4

“Under different nitrogen fertilizer regimes, the RUE is the most sensitive ecotype parameter, and the SDUL and SLLL show heigh sensitivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1165 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Under different irrigation regimes, PHINT is the most sensitive parameter for LAI, CWAD and CNAD before jointing.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
LAI, CWAD, and CNADe6
Direction
most sensitivee6
Qualifier
before jointinge6
Comparator
different irrigation regimese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CERES-Maize model”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–76 · show in text ↑
e6

“Under different irrigation regimes, the PHINT is the most sensitive parameter for LAI, CWAD, and CNAD before jointing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1360 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The influence of P1 on CNAD approaches its peak after jointing.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
influence of P1 on CNADe7
Qualifier
after jointinge7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CERES-Maize model”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–76 · show in text ↑
e7

“The influence of P1 on CNAD approachs to peak after jointing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1422 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

SRGF is highly sensitive for CNAD before tasseling.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
highly sensitive for CNADe7
Qualifier
before tasselinge7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CERES-Maize model”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–76 · show in text ↑
e7

“the SRGF is highly sensitive for CNAD before tasseling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1482 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)simulated

Claim · model-written summary

In comparison with water treatments, the sensitive period of PHINT is significantly shorter under nitrogen treatments.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
sensitive period of PHINT to time-series variablese1
Direction
shortere1
Comparator
water treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CERES-Maize model”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–76 · show in text ↑
e1

“In comparison with water treatments, the sensitive period of PHINT to time-series variables is significantly shorter under nitrogen treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1484–1626 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

RUE remains sensitive to LAI and CWAD throughout the growing season.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
sensitive to LAI and CWADe1
Qualifier
throughout the growing seasone1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CERES-Maize model”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–76 · show in text ↑
e1

“whereas RUE remains sensitive to LAI and CWAD throughout the growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1628–1703 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

For CNAD, the TSI of cultivar, ecotype and soil parameters is highest at the seedling stage under water and nitrogen stresses.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
seedling stagee1
Treatment
water and nitrogen stressese1
Outcome
TSIe1
Direction
higheste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CERES-Maize model”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–76 · show in text ↑
e1

“For CNAD, the TSI of cultivar, ecotype and soil parameters are the highest at the seedling stage under both water and nitrogen stresses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1705–1840 · show in text ↑