Paper · 2026 · Scientific African

Ethnobotanical survey of antidiabetic plants used by Maasai traditional practitioners in Monduli District, Arusha, Tanzania

Wilfrida Paul Roman; Haikael David Martin; Huda Ismail; et al.

12
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Traditional medicines, particularly medicinal plants, are valuable sources of antidiabetic therapy for many rural populations. However, there is limited documentation of the plants used by rural traditional healers, including the Maasai traditional practitioners (MTPs) in Tanzania. This study aims to document the traditional knowledge and antidiabetic plants used by MTPs in Monduli District, Arusha, Tanzania. An ethnobotanical survey was conducted from January to July 2024 among 55 MTPs in Monduli District, Arusha, Tanzania. The majority (70.9%) of MTPs had over 20 years of traditional experience of practice. The MTPs diagnose diabetes through signs and symptoms, and they identified physical inactivity (36%), high blood pressure (19%), and unhealthy diet (16%) as key risk factors for the development of diabetes. More than half (58.2%) of MTPs treat 1–10 diabetic patients per month. The study identified 41 species belonging to 21 plant families. The family Fabaceae represented the highest number of species (17%), followed by Combretaceae, Lamiaceae, Rutaceae, and Solanaceae (7%). The most frequently cited antidiabetic plants were Rhamnus staddo (RFC = 0.56, FL = 80.6), Zanthoxylum chalybeum (RFC = 0.49, FL= 85.2), Physalis peruviana (RFC = 0.49, FL = 77.8), Albizia anthelmintica (RFC = 0.47, FL= 80.8), and Pappea capensis (RFC = 0.47, FL = 69.2%). Roots (41%) and barks (31%) were the most harvested plant parts. Decoction was the primary method of remedies preparation with oral administration being preferred route. This study highlights the extensive antidiabetic knowledge of MTPs in the treatment of diabetes using medicinal plants. Of the 41 identified plants, over 81.5% have demonstrated promising antidiabetic activity in preclinical studies; however, further research is needed to isolate their bioactive compounds and elucidate their mechanisms of action.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The survey identified 41 plant species in 21 families.

Taxon
plante0
Outcome
speciese0
Value
41e0
Setting
Monduli District, Arusha, Tanzaniae1

Verbatim

e0

“The study identified 41 species belonging to 21 plant families”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–957 · show in text ↑
e1

“An ethnobotanical survey was conducted from January to July 2024 among 55 MTPs in Monduli District, Arusha, Tanzania”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–529 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fabaceae represented the largest species share at 17%.

Taxon
FabaceaeFabaceaee0
Outcome
number of speciese0
Direction
higheste0
Value
17%e0

Verbatim

e0

“The family Fabaceae represented the highest number of species (17%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1026 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combretaceae, Lamiaceae, Rutaceae and Solanaceae each followed at 7%.

Taxon
CombretaceaeCombretaceaee0
Outcome
Combretaceae, Lamiaceae, Rutaceae, and Solanaceaee0
Value
7%e0

Verbatim

e0

“followed by Combretaceae, Lamiaceae, Rutaceae, and Solanaceae (7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1094 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhamnus staddo was frequently cited as antidiabetic.

Taxon
Rhamnus staddoRhamnus staddoe0
Outcome
RFCe0
Value
0.56e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhamnus staddo
Rhamnus staddo · TaxonTifNefertari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rhamnus staddo (RFC = 0.56, FL = 80.6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1185 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zanthoxylum chalybeum was frequently cited as antidiabetic.

Taxon
Zanthoxylum chalybeumZanthoxylum chalybeume0
Outcome
RFCe0
Value
0.49e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zanthoxylum chalybeum
Zanthoxylum chalybeum · TaxonAwinch1001 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zanthoxylum chalybeum (RFC = 0.49, FL= 85.2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1231 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Physalis peruviana was frequently cited as antidiabetic.

Taxon
Physalis peruvianaPhysalis peruvianae0
Outcome
RFCe0
Value
0.49e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Physalis peruviana
Physalis peruviana · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Physalis peruviana (RFC = 0.49, FL = 77.8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1275 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Albizia anthelmintica was frequently cited as antidiabetic.

Taxon
Albizia anthelminticaAlbizia anthelminticae0
Outcome
RFCe0
Value
0.47e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Albizia anthelmintica
Albizia anthelmintica · TaxonSAplants · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Albizia anthelmintica (RFC = 0.47, FL= 80.8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1321 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Roots were the most harvested plant part at 41%.

Taxon
plante0
Organ / stage
Rootse0
Outcome
harvested plant partse0
Value
41%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Roots (41%) and barks (31%) were the most harvested plant parts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1369–1432 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barks were harvested at 31%.

Taxon
plante0
Organ / stage
barkse0
Outcome
harvested plant partse0
Value
31%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Roots (41%) and barks (31%) were the most harvested plant parts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1369–1432 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Decoction was the primary remedy preparation method.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaet0
Outcome
Decoctione0

Verbatim

e0

“Decoction was the primary method of remedies preparation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1434–1490 · show in text ↑
t0

“plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oral administration was the preferred route for remedies.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaet0
Outcome
oral administratione0

Verbatim

e0

“oral administration being preferred route”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1537 · show in text ↑
t0

“plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑