Abstract
This study assessed the incidence and distribution of major viral infections in grapevines across South Korea. A total of 534 grapevine samples representing five cultivars were collected and tested for three economically important viruses: grapevine fleck virus (GFkV), grapevine leafroll-associated virus (GLRaV)-1, and GLRaV-3. The overall infection rate among all samples was 92.7%, indicating a high prevalence of viral infections in domestic vineyards. Individual virus detection rates were 88.8% for GFkV, 33.5% for GLRaV-1, and 31.6% for GLRaV-3. Regional infection rates varied, with 100% incidence observed in Daejeon and Gangwon-do, followed by Chungcheongbuk-do (99.4%), Chungcheongnam-do (95.2%), Jeollabuk-do (94.2%), Gyeongsangbukdo (88.4%), Gyeongsangnam-do (87.5%), and Gyeonggi-do (77.0%). Among grapevine cultivars, infection frequencies were highest in Chungrang (100%), followed by Shine Muscat (95.5%), Muscat Bailey-A (90.5%), Campbell Early (90.1%), and Kyoho (84.6%). Single infections accounted for 44.8% of cases, double infections for 34.5%, and triple infections for 13.5%. The most prevalent double infections were GFkV + GLRaV-1 (19.5%) and GFkV + GLRaV-3 (14.8%), while co-infection with GLRaV-1 + GLRaV-3 occurred rarely (0.2%). The incidence of triple infections was highest in Shine Muscat (17.2%), followed by Campbell Early (11.7%), Kyoho (7.7%), and both Chungrang and Muscat Bailey-A (4.8%). Our findings highlight the widespread occurrence of grapevine viruses across regions and cultivars in Korea, underscoring the urgent need for effective management strategies to control virus diseases in grapevine.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 20
Claim · model-written summary
Overall grapevine virus infection was 92.7%.
VitisOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The overall infection rate among all samples was 92.7%”
t0“Grapevine”
Claim · model-written summary
GFkV detection was 88.8%.
- Interactor
- GFkVGrapevine fleck viruse0pathogen
- Outcome
- virus detection ratese0
- Value
- 88.8%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Individual virus detection rates were 88.8% for GFkV, 33.5% for GLRaV-1, and 31.6% for GLRaV-3.”
t0“Grapevine”
Claim · model-written summary
GLRaV-1 detection was 33.5%.
- Interactor
- GLRaV-1Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 1e0pathogen
- Outcome
- virus detection ratese0
- Value
- 33.5%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Individual virus detection rates were 88.8% for GFkV, 33.5% for GLRaV-1, and 31.6% for GLRaV-3.”
t0“Grapevine”
Claim · model-written summary
GLRaV-3 detection was 31.6%.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Individual virus detection rates were 88.8% for GFkV, 33.5% for GLRaV-1, and 31.6% for GLRaV-3.”
t0“Grapevine”
Claim · model-written summary
Regional infection incidence in Daejeon was 100%.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Regional infection rates varied, with 100% incidence observed in Daejeon and Gangwon-do, followed by Chungcheongbuk-do (99.4%), Chungcheongnam-do (95.2%), Jeollabuk-do (94.2%), Gyeongsangbukdo (88.4%), Gyeongsangnam-do (87.5%), and Gyeonggi-do (77.0%).”
t0“Grapevine”
Claim · model-written summary
Regional infection incidence in Gangwon-do was 100%.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Regional infection rates varied, with 100% incidence observed in Daejeon and Gangwon-do, followed by Chungcheongbuk-do (99.4%), Chungcheongnam-do (95.2%), Jeollabuk-do (94.2%), Gyeongsangbukdo (88.4%), Gyeongsangnam-do (87.5%), and Gyeonggi-do (77.0%).”
t0“Grapevine”
Claim · model-written summary
Regional infection incidence in Chungcheongbuk-do was 99.4%.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Regional infection rates varied, with 100% incidence observed in Daejeon and Gangwon-do, followed by Chungcheongbuk-do (99.4%), Chungcheongnam-do (95.2%), Jeollabuk-do (94.2%), Gyeongsangbukdo (88.4%), Gyeongsangnam-do (87.5%), and Gyeonggi-do (77.0%).”
t0“Grapevine”
Claim · model-written summary
Regional infection incidence in Chungcheongnam-do was 95.2%.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Regional infection rates varied, with 100% incidence observed in Daejeon and Gangwon-do, followed by Chungcheongbuk-do (99.4%), Chungcheongnam-do (95.2%), Jeollabuk-do (94.2%), Gyeongsangbukdo (88.4%), Gyeongsangnam-do (87.5%), and Gyeonggi-do (77.0%).”
t0“Grapevine”
Claim · model-written summary
Regional infection incidence in Jeollabuk-do was 94.2%.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Regional infection rates varied, with 100% incidence observed in Daejeon and Gangwon-do, followed by Chungcheongbuk-do (99.4%), Chungcheongnam-do (95.2%), Jeollabuk-do (94.2%), Gyeongsangbukdo (88.4%), Gyeongsangnam-do (87.5%), and Gyeonggi-do (77.0%).”
t0“Grapevine”
Claim · model-written summary
Regional infection incidence in Gyeongsangbukdo was 88.4%.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Regional infection rates varied, with 100% incidence observed in Daejeon and Gangwon-do, followed by Chungcheongbuk-do (99.4%), Chungcheongnam-do (95.2%), Jeollabuk-do (94.2%), Gyeongsangbukdo (88.4%), Gyeongsangnam-do (87.5%), and Gyeonggi-do (77.0%).”
t0“Grapevine”
Claim · model-written summary
Regional infection incidence in Gyeongsangnam-do was 87.5%.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Regional infection rates varied, with 100% incidence observed in Daejeon and Gangwon-do, followed by Chungcheongbuk-do (99.4%), Chungcheongnam-do (95.2%), Jeollabuk-do (94.2%), Gyeongsangbukdo (88.4%), Gyeongsangnam-do (87.5%), and Gyeonggi-do (77.0%).”
t0“Grapevine”
Claim · model-written summary
Regional infection incidence in Gyeonggi-do was 77.0%.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Regional infection rates varied, with 100% incidence observed in Daejeon and Gangwon-do, followed by Chungcheongbuk-do (99.4%), Chungcheongnam-do (95.2%), Jeollabuk-do (94.2%), Gyeongsangbukdo (88.4%), Gyeongsangnam-do (87.5%), and Gyeonggi-do (77.0%).”
t0“Grapevine”
Claim · model-written summary
Infection frequency in Chungrang was 100%.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Among grapevine cultivars, infection frequencies were highest in Chungrang (100%), followed by Shine Muscat (95.5%), Muscat Bailey-A (90.5%), Campbell Early (90.1%), and Kyoho (84.6%).”
Claim · model-written summary
Infection frequency in Shine Muscat was 95.5%.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Among grapevine cultivars, infection frequencies were highest in Chungrang (100%), followed by Shine Muscat (95.5%), Muscat Bailey-A (90.5%), Campbell Early (90.1%), and Kyoho (84.6%).”
Claim · model-written summary
Infection frequency in Muscat Bailey-A was 90.5%.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Among grapevine cultivars, infection frequencies were highest in Chungrang (100%), followed by Shine Muscat (95.5%), Muscat Bailey-A (90.5%), Campbell Early (90.1%), and Kyoho (84.6%).”
Claim · model-written summary
Infection frequency in Campbell Early was 90.1%.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Among grapevine cultivars, infection frequencies were highest in Chungrang (100%), followed by Shine Muscat (95.5%), Muscat Bailey-A (90.5%), Campbell Early (90.1%), and Kyoho (84.6%).”
Claim · model-written summary
Infection frequency in Kyoho was 84.6%.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Among grapevine cultivars, infection frequencies were highest in Chungrang (100%), followed by Shine Muscat (95.5%), Muscat Bailey-A (90.5%), Campbell Early (90.1%), and Kyoho (84.6%).”
Claim · model-written summary
Single infections accounted for 44.8% of cases.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Single infections accounted for 44.8% of cases, double infections for 34.5%, and triple infections for 13.5%.”
t0“Grapevine”
Claim · model-written summary
double infections accounted for 34.5% of cases.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Single infections accounted for 44.8% of cases, double infections for 34.5%, and triple infections for 13.5%.”
t0“Grapevine”
Claim · model-written summary
triple infections accounted for 13.5% of cases.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Single infections accounted for 44.8% of cases, double infections for 34.5%, and triple infections for 13.5%.”
t0“Grapevine”