Paper · 2026 · Plants

Assessment of Genetic Diversity and Differentiation in Triadica cochinchinensis Populations Using SSR Markers

Pengyan Zhou; Qi Zhou; Chenghao Zhang; et al.

14
claims
29
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Genetic diversity is fundamental for the conservation and sustainable utilization of plant species. Triadica cochinchinensis, a tree species native to southern China, is an important ornamental and nectar-producing plant with considerable economic value. However, the levels of genetic diversity and the patterns of population differentiation across its natural populations remain unexplored. Here, we developed 24 highly polymorphic SSR markers and used them to assess the genetic diversity and differentiation among 280 individuals collected from 10 natural populations of T. cochinchinensis. The results showed that the average expected heterozygosity (He) revealed by the SSR markers was 0.774, and the average Shannon diversity index (I) was 1.660, indicating a high level of genetic diversity at the species level of T. cochinchinensis. Analysis using SSR markers revealed a low average observed heterozygosity (Ho = 0.323) and a relatively high average inbreeding coefficient within populations (F = 0.466). These findings suggest that inbreeding is likely occurring, which may contribute to a loss of heterozygosity within the studied populations. Notably, not all populations had high genetic diversity. For example, the He of SC2 population (0.490), QY population (0.568), and SC1 population (0.585) were all below the mean He (0.607), suggesting that attention should be given to protecting populations with low genetic diversity. The results further showed that the average genetic differentiation coefficient (FST) between populations was 0.094, and the average gene flow (Nm) was 2.278, indicating that the natural populations of T. cochinchinensis had low genetic differentiation and relatively high gene flow. AMOVA indicated that 74% of the total variation was distributed within populations. Notably, populations SC1 and SC2 exhibited higher genetic differentiation from all others (FST > 0.1), which is likely attributed to mountain barriers restricting gene flow. Therefore, it is recommended to enhance in situ conservation efforts while also facilitating assisted gene flow, such as through artificial introduction. For the first time, this study reveals the genetic information of natural populations of T. cochinchinensis at the molecular level, thereby offering a valuable reference for the conservation and utilization of its germplasm resources.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The average expected heterozygosity of T. cochinchinensis revealed by SSR markers was 0.774.

Taxon
Triadica cochinchinensisTriadica cochinchinensist0
Outcome
average expected heterozygositye0
Value
0.774e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triadica cochinchinensis
Triadica cochinchinensis · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons category阿橋 HQ · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triadica cochinchinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“the average expected heterozygosity (He) revealed by the SSR markers was 0.774, and the average Shannon diversity index (I) was 1.660”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–752 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The average Shannon diversity index of T. cochinchinensis was 1.660.

Taxon
Triadica cochinchinensisTriadica cochinchinensist0
Outcome
average Shannon diversity indexe0
Value
1.660e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triadica cochinchinensis
Triadica cochinchinensis · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons category阿橋 HQ · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triadica cochinchinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“the average expected heterozygosity (He) revealed by the SSR markers was 0.774, and the average Shannon diversity index (I) was 1.660”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–752 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The average observed heterozygosity was low at 0.323.

Taxon
Triadica cochinchinensisTriadica cochinchinensist0
Outcome
average observed heterozygositye0
Direction
lowe0
Value
0.323e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triadica cochinchinensis
Triadica cochinchinensis · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons category阿橋 HQ · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triadica cochinchinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“a low average observed heterozygosity (Ho = 0.323) and a relatively high average inbreeding coefficient within populations (F = 0.466)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1013 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The average inbreeding coefficient within populations was relatively high at 0.466.

Taxon
Triadica cochinchinensisTriadica cochinchinensist0
Outcome
average inbreeding coefficient within populationse0
Direction
highe0
Value
0.466e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triadica cochinchinensis
Triadica cochinchinensis · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons category阿橋 HQ · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triadica cochinchinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“a low average observed heterozygosity (Ho = 0.323) and a relatively high average inbreeding coefficient within populations (F = 0.466)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1013 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest that inbreeding is likely occurring in the studied populations.

Taxon
Triadica cochinchinensisTriadica cochinchinensist0
Outcome
inbreedinge0
Qualifier
likely occurringe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triadica cochinchinensis
Triadica cochinchinensis · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons category阿橋 HQ · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triadica cochinchinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“These findings suggest that inbreeding is likely occurring”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1073 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The He of the SC2 population (0.490) was below the mean He.

Taxon
Triadica cochinchinensisTriadica cochinchinensist0
Material
SC2 populatione0
Outcome
Hee0
Direction
belowe0
Value
0.490e0
Qualifier
0.607e0
Comparator
the mean Hee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triadica cochinchinensis
Triadica cochinchinensis · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons category阿橋 HQ · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triadica cochinchinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“the He of SC2 population (0.490), QY population (0.568), and SC1 population (0.585) were all below the mean He (0.607)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1344 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The He of the QY population (0.568) was below the mean He.

Taxon
Triadica cochinchinensisTriadica cochinchinensist0
Material
QY populatione0
Outcome
Hee0
Direction
belowe0
Value
0.568e0
Qualifier
0.607e0
Comparator
the mean Hee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triadica cochinchinensis
Triadica cochinchinensis · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons category阿橋 HQ · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triadica cochinchinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“the He of SC2 population (0.490), QY population (0.568), and SC1 population (0.585) were all below the mean He (0.607)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1344 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The He of the SC1 population (0.585) was below the mean He.

Taxon
Triadica cochinchinensisTriadica cochinchinensist0
Material
SC1 populatione0
Outcome
Hee0
Direction
belowe0
Value
0.585e0
Qualifier
0.607e0
Comparator
the mean Hee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triadica cochinchinensis
Triadica cochinchinensis · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons category阿橋 HQ · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triadica cochinchinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“the He of SC2 population (0.490), QY population (0.568), and SC1 population (0.585) were all below the mean He (0.607)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1344 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The average genetic differentiation coefficient between populations was 0.094.

Taxon
Triadica cochinchinensisTriadica cochinchinensist0
Outcome
average genetic differentiation coefficiente0
Value
0.094e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triadica cochinchinensis
Triadica cochinchinensis · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons category阿橋 HQ · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triadica cochinchinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“the average genetic differentiation coefficient (FST) between populations was 0.094, and the average gene flow (Nm) was 2.278”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1474–1599 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The average gene flow (Nm) between populations was 2.278.

Taxon
Triadica cochinchinensisTriadica cochinchinensist0
Outcome
average gene flowe0
Value
2.278e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triadica cochinchinensis
Triadica cochinchinensis · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons category阿橋 HQ · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triadica cochinchinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“the average genetic differentiation coefficient (FST) between populations was 0.094, and the average gene flow (Nm) was 2.278”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1474–1599 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMOVA showed 74% of the total variation was distributed within populations.

Taxon
Triadica cochinchinensisTriadica cochinchinensist0
Outcome
total variatione0
Value
74%e0
Qualifier
within populationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triadica cochinchinensis
Triadica cochinchinensis · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons category阿橋 HQ · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triadica cochinchinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“AMOVA indicated that 74% of the total variation was distributed within populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1726–1808 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Populations SC1 and SC2 showed higher genetic differentiation from all other populations (FST > 0.1).

Taxon
Triadica cochinchinensisTriadica cochinchinensist0
Material
populations SC1 and SC2e0
Outcome
genetic differentiatione0
Direction
highere0
Value
FST > 0.1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triadica cochinchinensis
Triadica cochinchinensis · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons category阿橋 HQ · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triadica cochinchinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“populations SC1 and SC2 exhibited higher genetic differentiation from all others (FST > 0.1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1819–1911 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The higher differentiation of SC1 and SC2 is likely attributed to mountain barriers restricting gene flow.

Taxon
Triadica cochinchinensisTriadica cochinchinensist0
Outcome
higher genetic differentiatione0
Qualifier
mountain barriers restricting gene flowe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triadica cochinchinensis
Triadica cochinchinensis · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons category阿橋 HQ · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triadica cochinchinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“populations SC1 and SC2 exhibited higher genetic differentiation from all others (FST > 0.1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1819–1911 · show in text ↑
e1

“which is likely attributed to mountain barriers restricting gene flow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1913–1982 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend enhancing in situ conservation and facilitating assisted gene flow.

Taxon
Triadica cochinchinensisTriadica cochinchinensist0
Outcome
enhance in situ conservation effortse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triadica cochinchinensis
Triadica cochinchinensis · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons category阿橋 HQ · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triadica cochinchinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“it is recommended to enhance in situ conservation efforts while also facilitating assisted gene flow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1995–2095 · show in text ↑