Paper · 2026 · Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine

Ethnobotanical assessment of wild edible plants and indigenous knowledge in Tegedie District, Ethiopia

Alemnesh Goshe; Getinet Masresha; Muluye Asnakew; et al.

12
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Wild edible plants (WEPs) play a crucial role in rural livelihoods, food security, and cultural heritage in Ethiopia. Despite their importance, comprehensive documentation of WEP diversity, utilization, and associated indigenous knowledge in Tegedie District remains limited. This study aimed to identify WEP species, evaluate their uses, assess knowledge distribution among community members, and identify threats to their sustainability. METHODS: Ethnobotanical data were collected from 144 purposively selected informants across eight sites using semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions, and guided field observations. Quantitative indices, including the Relative Frequency of Citation (RFC) and Jaccard Similarity Index (JSI), were employed to assess species importance, cultural significance, and similarity with other Ethiopian districts. Preference ranking and direct matrix ranking were used to evaluate species preference, multifunctionality, and perceived threats. Data analysis was conducted using R software, and species identifications were cross-checked against the IUCN Red List. RESULTS: A total of 52 WEP species were documented, comprising trees, shrubs, herbs, and climbers. Fruit-bearing trees and shrubs were the most frequently cited, highly preferred, and culturally significant. The top-ranked WEPs included Cordia africana Lam., Syzygium guineense (Willd.) DC., Diospyros mespiliformis Hochst. ex A.DC., and Tamarindus indica L. Knowledge of WEPs was significantly higher among men, older individuals, illiterate participants, and key informants (P < 0.005), reflecting the cumulative and experiential nature of indigenous knowledge. Major threats to WEPs included agricultural expansion, overgrazing, firewood collection, charcoal production, and habitat degradation. WEPs were primarily harvested from forests, grazing lands, and uncultivated areas, with knowledge transferred orally and through hands-on participation in harvesting. CONCLUSION: WEPs in Tegedie District are vital for dietary diversity, food security, and cultural practices, but they face significant anthropogenic and environmental pressures. Conservation strategies, including habitat protection, sustainable harvesting, ex situ cultivation, and systematic documentation of indigenous knowledge, are urgently needed. Promoting intergenerational knowledge transfer is essential to ensure the continued availability and sustainable use of these valuable plant resources.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The survey documented 52 wild edible plant species spanning trees, shrubs, herbs and climbers.

Taxon
WEP speciese0
Outcome
WEP species were documentede0
Value
52e0
Setting
Tegedie Districtt0

Verbatim

e0

“A total of 52 WEP species were documented, comprising trees, shrubs, herbs, and climbers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1217 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tegedie District”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit-bearing trees and shrubs were the most frequently cited, preferred and culturally significant wild edible plants.

Taxon
Fruit-bearing trees and shrubse0
Outcome
frequently cited, highly preferred, and culturally significante0
Direction
moste0

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit-bearing trees and shrubs were the most frequently cited, highly preferred, and culturally significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1326 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cordia africana Lam. was among the top-ranked wild edible plants.

Taxon
Cordia africana Lam.Cordia africanae0
Outcome
top-ranked WEPse0
Direction
top-rankede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cordia africana
Cordia africana · TaxonB.navez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The top-ranked WEPs included Cordia africana Lam., Syzygium guineense (Willd.) DC., Diospyros mespiliformis Hochst. ex A.DC., and Tamarindus indica L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1477 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Syzygium guineense (Willd.) DC. was among the top-ranked wild edible plants.

Taxon
Syzygium guineense (Willd.) DC.Syzygium guineensee0
Outcome
top-ranked WEPse0
Direction
top-rankede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Syzygium guineense
Syzygium guineense · Taxonhttp://tropical.theferns.info/viewtropical.php?id=Syzygium+guineense · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The top-ranked WEPs included Cordia africana Lam., Syzygium guineense (Willd.) DC., Diospyros mespiliformis Hochst. ex A.DC., and Tamarindus indica L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1477 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diospyros mespiliformis Hochst. ex A.DC. was among the top-ranked wild edible plants.

Taxon
Diospyros mespiliformis Hochst. ex A.DC.Diospyros mespiliformise0
Outcome
top-ranked WEPse0
Direction
top-rankede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Diospyros mespiliformis
Diospyros mespiliformis · TaxonMarco Schmidt · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The top-ranked WEPs included Cordia africana Lam., Syzygium guineense (Willd.) DC., Diospyros mespiliformis Hochst. ex A.DC., and Tamarindus indica L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1477 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tamarindus indica L. was among the top-ranked wild edible plants.

Taxon
Tamarindus indica L.Tamarindus indicae0
Outcome
top-ranked WEPse0
Direction
top-rankede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tamarindus indica
Tamarindus indica · TaxonKaushlendrapathe · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The top-ranked WEPs included Cordia africana Lam., Syzygium guineense (Willd.) DC., Diospyros mespiliformis Hochst. ex A.DC., and Tamarindus indica L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1477 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Knowledge of wild edible plants was significantly higher among men, older individuals, illiterate participants and key informants.

Taxon
WEPse0
Outcome
Knowledge of WEPse0
Direction
highere0
Value
P < 0.005e0
Comparator
men, older individuals, illiterate participants, and key informantse0

Verbatim

e0

“Knowledge of WEPs was significantly higher among men, older individuals, illiterate participants, and key informants (P < 0.005)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1478–1606 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Agricultural expansion, overgrazing, firewood collection, charcoal production and habitat degradation were identified as major threats to wild edible plants.

Taxon
WEPse0
Outcome
Major threats to WEPse0
Qualifier
agricultural expansion, overgrazing, firewood collection, charcoal production, and habitat degradatione0

Verbatim

e0

“Major threats to WEPs included agricultural expansion, overgrazing, firewood collection, charcoal production, and habitat degradation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1683–1817 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wild edible plants were primarily harvested from forests, grazing lands and uncultivated areas.

Taxon
WEPse0
Outcome
primarily harvestede0
Setting
forests, grazing lands, and uncultivated arease0

Verbatim

e0

“WEPs were primarily harvested from forests, grazing lands, and uncultivated areas, with knowledge transferred orally and through hands-on participation in harvesting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1818–1984 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Knowledge of wild edible plants was transferred orally and through participation in harvesting.

Taxon
WEPse0
Outcome
knowledge transferred orally and through hands-on participation in harvestinge0

Verbatim

e0

“WEPs were primarily harvested from forests, grazing lands, and uncultivated areas, with knowledge transferred orally and through hands-on participation in harvesting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1818–1984 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend habitat protection, sustainable harvesting, ex situ cultivation and systematic documentation of indigenous knowledge.

Taxon
wild edible plantst0
Outcome
habitat protection, sustainable harvesting, ex situ cultivation, and systematic documentation of indigenous knowledgee0

Verbatim

e0

“Conservation strategies, including habitat protection, sustainable harvesting, ex situ cultivation, and systematic documentation of indigenous knowledge, are urgently needed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2163–2337 · show in text ↑
t0

“wild edible plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–47 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend promoting intergenerational knowledge transfer for continued availability and sustainable use of wild edible plants.

Taxon
wild edible plantst0
Outcome
Promoting intergenerational knowledge transfere0

Verbatim

e0

“Promoting intergenerational knowledge transfer is essential to ensure the continued availability and sustainable use of these valuable plant resources.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2338–2489 · show in text ↑
t0

“wild edible plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–47 · show in text ↑