Paper · 2026 · International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences

Effectiveness of Mepiquat Chloride Application Timing on Physiological, Agronomic, and Fiber Quality Traits of Cotton (Gossypium spp.) Varieties

Mashenene Malima; Orhan Kurt; Sikitu Kazungu; et al.

20
claims
46
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A two-year field study underscores the importance of integrating genotype selection with optimized Mepiquat Chloride (MC) management to enhance cotton performance under a split–split–plot design. Significant genotype × environment × management interactions were observed in cotton growth, yield, and fiber quality responses MC application. Plant height was significantly affected by year × variety interaction (p < 0.01), with the tallest plants in Selin (2023) and Sezener (2022). Leaf area was higher in 2022, while 800 cc. ha-1 enhanced leaf expansion. Monopodial branches were significantly greater in 2023 (9.59 plant-1), with early MC application favoring branch initiation. Seed cotton yield was peak in Selin (3623 kg ha-1), 25% greater than Sezener, with split application (400 + 400 cc. ha-1) yielding best results. Boll number and individual fiber weight were higher in Selin and Sezener, respectively, with the latter showing a 48% increase under 400 cc. ha-1. Seed index was significantly higher in Sezener, and fiber moisture increased in 2023 (8.94%). Fiber quality traits revealed pronounced year, genotype, and application timing effects: fiber length peaked in Sezener (30.33 mm), elongation reached 5.80%, and micronaire increased to 4.89 µg inch-1 under split MC application. Fiber strength increased by 13.07% in 2023, and while uniformity (85.62%) maximized with later application. Short fiber content decreased by 14.81% in 2023. These findings highlight that MC concentration, timing, and genotype interactions significantly modulate morphophysiological traits, yield components, and fiber quality, with split or moderate-dose applications enhancing productivity and fiber properties under Mediterranean conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height was significantly affected by a year × variety interaction in cotton.

Taxon
Gossypium spp.Gossypiumt0
Outcome
Plant heighte0
Qualifier
p < 0.01e0
Setting
yeare0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium
Gossypium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)H. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“Plant height was significantly affected by year × variety interaction (p < 0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–420 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selin in 2023 and Sezener in 2022 had the tallest cotton plants.

Taxon
Gossypium spp.Gossypiumt0
Material
Seline0
Outcome
tallest plantse0
Qualifier
Sezener (2022)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium
Gossypium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)H. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“with the tallest plants in Selin (2023) and Sezener (2022)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–480 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area was higher in 2022.

Taxon
Gossypium spp.Gossypiumt0
Outcome
Leaf areae0
Direction
highere0
Setting
2022e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium
Gossypium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)H. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“Leaf area was higher in 2022”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–510 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An 800 cc. ha-1 MC dose enhanced cotton leaf expansion.

Taxon
Gossypium spp.Gossypiumt0
Treatment
800 cce0
Outcome
leaf expansione1
Direction
enhancede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium
Gossypium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)H. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“while 800 cc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–524 · show in text ↑
e1

“enhanced leaf expansion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–565 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Monopodial branches were significantly greater in 2023, at 9.59 per plant.

Taxon
Gossypium spp.Gossypiumt0
Outcome
Monopodial branchese0
Direction
greatere0
Value
9.59e0
Setting
2023e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium
Gossypium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)H. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“Monopodial branches were significantly greater in 2023 (9.59 plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–633 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early MC application increased monopodial branch initiation.

Taxon
Gossypium spp.Gossypiumt0
Treatment
early MC applicatione0
Outcome
branch initiatione0
Direction
increaseinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium
Gossypium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)H. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“with early MC application favoring branch initiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–701 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed cotton yield peaked in Selin at 3623 (kg/ha).

Taxon
Gossypium spp.Gossypiumt0
Material
Seline0
Outcome
Seed cotton yielde0
Value
3623e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium
Gossypium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)H. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“Seed cotton yield was peak in Selin (3623 kg ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–750 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed cotton yield of Selin was 25% greater than that of Sezener.

Taxon
Gossypium spp.Gossypiumt0
Material
Seline0
Outcome
Seed cotton yielde0
Direction
greatere1
Value
25%e1
Comparator
Sezenere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium
Gossypium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)H. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“Seed cotton yield was peak in Selin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–738 · show in text ↑
e1

“25% greater than Sezener”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–790 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Split MC application (400 + 400 cc) gave the highest seed cotton yield.

Taxon
Gossypium spp.Gossypiumt0
Treatment
split applicatione0
Outcome
Seed cotton yielde2
Direction
higherinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium
Gossypium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)H. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“with split application (400 + 400 cc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–828 · show in text ↑
e1

“yielding best results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–868 · show in text ↑
e2

“Seed cotton yield was peak in Selin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–738 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boll number was higher in Selin.

Taxon
Gossypium spp.Gossypiumt0
Material
Seline0
Outcome
Boll numbere0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium
Gossypium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)H. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“Boll number and individual fiber weight were higher in Selin and Sezener, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–956 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Individual fiber weight was higher in Sezener.

Taxon
Gossypium spp.Gossypiumt0
Material
Sezenere0
Outcome
individual fiber weighte0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium
Gossypium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)H. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“Boll number and individual fiber weight were higher in Selin and Sezener, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–956 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 400 cc. ha-1 MC dose increased individual fiber weight by 48%.

Taxon
Gossypium spp.Gossypiumt0
Treatment
400 cce0
Outcome
individual fiber weighte1
Direction
increasee0
Value
48%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium
Gossypium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)H. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“the latter showing a 48% increase under 400 cc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1009 · show in text ↑
e1

“individual fiber weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–909 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed index was significantly higher in Sezener.

Taxon
Gossypium spp.Gossypiumt0
Material
Sezenere0
Outcome
Seed indexe0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium
Gossypium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)H. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“Seed index was significantly higher in Sezener”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1074 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fiber moisture increased in 2023 to 8.94%.

Taxon
Gossypium spp.Gossypiumt0
Outcome
fiber moisturee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8.94%e0
Setting
2023e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium
Gossypium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)H. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“fiber moisture increased in 2023 (8.94%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1120 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fiber length peaked in Sezener at 30.33 mm.

Taxon
Gossypium spp.Gossypiumt0
Material
Sezenere0
Outcome
fiber lengthe0
Direction
peakede0
Value
30.33 mme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium
Gossypium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)H. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“fiber length peaked in Sezener (30.33 mm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1252 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elongation reached 5.80%.

Taxon
Gossypium spp.Gossypiumt0
Outcome
elongatione0
Value
5.80%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium
Gossypium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)H. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“elongation reached 5.80%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1278 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Split MC application increased micronaire to 4.89.

Taxon
Gossypium spp.Gossypiumt0
Treatment
split MC applicatione1
Outcome
micronairee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4.89e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium
Gossypium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)H. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“micronaire increased to 4.89”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1284–1312 · show in text ↑
e1

“under split MC application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1360 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fiber strength increased by 13.07% in 2023.

Taxon
Gossypium spp.Gossypiumt0
Outcome
Fiber strengthe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13.07%e0
Setting
2023e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium
Gossypium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)H. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fiber strength increased by 13.07% in 2023”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1404 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later MC application maximized cotton uniformity at 85.62%.

Taxon
Gossypium spp.Gossypiumt0
Treatment
later applicatione0
Outcome
uniformitye0
Direction
maximizede0
Value
85.62%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium
Gossypium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)H. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“uniformity (85.62%) maximized with later application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1468 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Short fiber content decreased by 14.81% in 2023.

Taxon
Gossypium spp.Gossypiumt0
Outcome
Short fiber contente0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
14.81%e0
Setting
2023e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium
Gossypium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)H. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“Short fiber content decreased by 14.81% in 2023”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1470–1517 · show in text ↑