Paper · 2026 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Modeling temporal genetic variability using mixed models improves yield stability and selection efficiency in Coffea canephora

Alex Campanharo; Deurimar Herênio Gonçalves Júnior; Máskio Daros; et al.

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
0
citations
5
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Introduction: Increasing climatic variability challenges Coffea canephora breeding programs to identify genotypes that combine high productivity with temporal stability across contrasting seasons. Methods: We evaluated 44 genotypes across four consecutive crop seasons (2022-2025) in eastern Minas Gerais, Brazil, using mixed linear models (REML/BLUP) with seven alternative variance-covariance structures for genetic and residual effects. Results: The flexible model M7 (unstructured genetic covariance matrix with year-specific residual variances) provided the best fit (lowest AIC and BIC). Plot-level heritability ranged from 0.64 to 0.68, genotype-mean heritability from 0.84 to 0.86, repeatability was 0.89, and selective accuracy ranged from 0.92 to 0.94. Genetic correlations revealed atypical behavior in 2023, driven by heat stress during grain filling. Relative selection efficiency increased cumulatively by 4.4% after four years. Genotypes Bicudo, A1, and AD1 combined the highest predicted genotypic values with elevated persistence indices. Discussion: Flexible mixed model approaches improve the reliability of genetic evaluation and support resilience-oriented selection strategies in C. canephora, enabling accelerated genetic gain and identification of superior genotypes adapted to variable cultivation conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M7 had the lowest AIC and BIC of evaluated models.

Taxon
Coffea canephoraCoffea canephorat0
Outcome
best fite0
Direction
loweste0
Qualifier
AIC and BICe0
Comparator
M7e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea canephora
Coffea canephora · TaxonKsd5 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The flexible model M7 (unstructured genetic covariance matrix with year-specific residual variances) provided the best fit (lowest AIC and BIC).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–593 · show in text ↑
t0

“Coffea canephora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–126 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plot-level heritability ranged from 0.64 to 0.68.

Taxon
Coffea canephoraCoffea canephorat0
Outcome
Plot-level heritabilitye0
Value
0.64 to 0.68e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea canephora
Coffea canephora · TaxonKsd5 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plot-level heritability ranged from 0.64 to 0.68”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–642 · show in text ↑
t0

“Coffea canephora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–126 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype-mean heritability ranged from 0.84 to 0.86.

Taxon
Coffea canephoraCoffea canephorat0
Outcome
genotype-mean heritabilitye0
Value
0.84 to 0.86e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea canephora
Coffea canephora · TaxonKsd5 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genotype-mean heritability from 0.84 to 0.86”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–688 · show in text ↑
t0

“Coffea canephora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–126 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeatability was 0.89.

Taxon
Coffea canephoraCoffea canephorat0
Outcome
repeatabilitye0
Value
0.89e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea canephora
Coffea canephora · TaxonKsd5 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“repeatability was 0.89”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–712 · show in text ↑
t0

“Coffea canephora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–126 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selective accuracy ranged from 0.92 to 0.94.

Taxon
Coffea canephoraCoffea canephorat0
Outcome
selective accuracye0
Value
0.92 to 0.94e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea canephora
Coffea canephora · TaxonKsd5 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“selective accuracy ranged from 0.92 to 0.94.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–762 · show in text ↑
t0

“Coffea canephora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–126 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genetic correlations indicated atypical 2023 behavior attributed to heat stress during grain filling.

Taxon
Coffea canephoraCoffea canephorat0
Treatment
heat stress during grain fillinge0
Outcome
atypical behavior in 2023e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea canephora
Coffea canephora · TaxonKsd5 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genetic correlations revealed atypical behavior in 2023, driven by heat stress during grain filling.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–863 · show in text ↑
t0

“Coffea canephora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–126 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative selection efficiency rose cumulatively by 4.4% after four years.

Taxon
Coffea canephoraCoffea canephorat0
Outcome
Relative selection efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4.4%e0
Qualifier
after four yearse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea canephora
Coffea canephora · TaxonKsd5 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relative selection efficiency increased cumulatively by 4.4% after four years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–942 · show in text ↑
t0

“Coffea canephora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–126 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bicudo combined a high predicted genotypic value and elevated persistence index.

Taxon
Coffea canephoraCoffea canephorat0
Material
Bicudoe0
Outcome
predicted genotypic values with elevated persistence indicese0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea canephora
Coffea canephora · TaxonKsd5 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genotypes Bicudo, A1, and AD1 combined the highest predicted genotypic values with elevated persistence indices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1055 · show in text ↑
t0

“Coffea canephora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–126 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A1 combined a high predicted genotypic value and elevated persistence index.

Taxon
Coffea canephoraCoffea canephorat0
Material
A1e0
Outcome
predicted genotypic values with elevated persistence indicese0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea canephora
Coffea canephora · TaxonKsd5 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genotypes Bicudo, A1, and AD1 combined the highest predicted genotypic values with elevated persistence indices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1055 · show in text ↑
t0

“Coffea canephora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–126 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AD1 combined a high predicted genotypic value and elevated persistence index.

Taxon
Coffea canephoraCoffea canephorat0
Material
AD1e0
Outcome
predicted genotypic values with elevated persistence indicese0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea canephora
Coffea canephora · TaxonKsd5 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genotypes Bicudo, A1, and AD1 combined the highest predicted genotypic values with elevated persistence indices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1055 · show in text ↑
t0

“Coffea canephora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–126 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flexible mixed models were interpreted as improving reliability of genetic evaluation.

Taxon
C. canephoraCoffea canephorae0
Outcome
reliability of genetic evaluatione0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea canephora
Coffea canephora · TaxonKsd5 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flexible mixed model approaches improve the reliability of genetic evaluation and support resilience-oriented selection strategies in C. canephora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1214 · show in text ↑