Paper · 2026 · UB Journal for Humanities

Deep Learning-Based Detection of Juniperus Procera Dieback in UAV Imagery Using an Ensemble Approach

Halima Alzubaidi

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Juniper trees are essential in many ecosystems, and any changes in the vegetation cover of juniper trees must be detected. Deep learning models were used in this study for detecting dieback in Juniperus procera in natural forests in the southern region of Saudi Arabia was examined. The goal in this study was to develop a reliable method for automated tree cover detection for large-scale environmental monitoring. Various deep learning models, including DenseNet121, InceptionResNetV2, custom convolutional neural network, Xception, ResNet50, and EfficientNetB2, were applied to classify images of juniper trees. The performance of each model was evaluated using metrics including accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, specificity, and the Jaccard index. An ensemble model was created by combining the four highest- ranking models (Xception, ResNet50, InceptionV3, and EfficientNetB2) to further increase the classification accuracy. The EfficientNetB2 model outperformed the other models on all evaluation metrics, achieving the highest accuracy (98%), precision (98%), recall (98%), F1 score (98%), specificity (98.63%), and Jaccard index (92.86%). InceptionV3 also performed well, with an accuracy of 96%. The ensemble model achieved an accuracy of 97%, demonstrating effectiveness in combining the strengths of the top-performing models. Deep learning models, particularly EfficientNetB2, offer a highly effective approach for classifying juniper trees into normal and dieback categories. These models provide a promising solution for automated ecological monitoring for preserving and managing juniper tree populations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EfficientNetB2 outperformed other models across all evaluation metrics for juniper dieback classification.

Taxon
Juniperus ProceraJuniperus procerat0
Outcome
all evaluation metricse0
Direction
outperformede0
Comparator
other modelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Juniperus procera
Juniperus procera · TaxonSema Tu · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The EfficientNetB2 model outperformed the other models on all evaluation metrics, achieving the highest accuracy (98%), precision (98%), recall (98%), F1 score (98%), specificity (98.63%), and Jaccard index (92.86%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1153 · show in text ↑
t0

“Juniperus Procera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–50 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EfficientNetB2 achieved 98% accuracy, precision, recall and F1 score.

Taxon
Juniperus ProceraJuniperus procerat0
Outcome
accuracy (98%), precision (98%), recall (98%), F1 scoree0
Direction
higheste0
Value
98%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Juniperus procera
Juniperus procera · TaxonSema Tu · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“achieving the highest accuracy (98%), precision (98%), recall (98%), F1 score (98%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1102 · show in text ↑
t0

“Juniperus Procera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–50 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EfficientNetB2 attained 98.63% specificity.

Taxon
Juniperus ProceraJuniperus procerat0
Outcome
specificitye0
Value
98.63%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Juniperus procera
Juniperus procera · TaxonSema Tu · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“specificity (98.63%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1124 · show in text ↑
t0

“Juniperus Procera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–50 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EfficientNetB2 attained a 92.86% Jaccard index.

Taxon
Juniperus ProceraJuniperus procerat0
Outcome
Jaccard indexe0
Value
92.86%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Juniperus procera
Juniperus procera · TaxonSema Tu · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Jaccard index (92.86%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1152 · show in text ↑
t0

“Juniperus Procera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–50 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

InceptionV3 achieved 96% accuracy.

Taxon
Juniperus ProceraJuniperus procerat0
Outcome
accuracye0
Value
96%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Juniperus procera
Juniperus procera · TaxonSema Tu · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“InceptionV3 also performed well, with an accuracy of 96%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1211 · show in text ↑
t0

“Juniperus Procera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–50 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The ensemble model achieved 97% accuracy.

Taxon
Juniperus ProceraJuniperus procerat0
Outcome
accuracye0
Value
97%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Juniperus procera
Juniperus procera · TaxonSema Tu · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ensemble model achieved an accuracy of 97%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1258 · show in text ↑
t0

“Juniperus Procera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–50 · show in text ↑